Advertisement

East Asia

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 199–216 | Cite as

The Potential of China-Japan-South Korea Free Trade Agreement

  • Min-Hua ChiangEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article explores the economic calculations behind the recent initiatives for the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the Governments of China, Japan and South Korea (CJK) and clarifies the implications for future regional economic integration. First, the proposed trilateral FTA signifies an advancement of China-centered regional economic integration. Regional economic integration led by China may also increase its political clout at the global stage. Second, the Governments of South Korea and Japan seek greater involvement in China's huge domestic market, but the former is concerned that a trilateral FTA will worsen its trade deficit with Japan, and the latter is afraid of losing its market shares in China and America to its Korean rival. Japan, therefore, seeks membership of both the CJK FTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Third, China and the US' active involvement in regional economic integration will push the three countries to go forward towards greater economic cooperation. However, it will take longer for China-led Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and America-led TPP to bear fruit because of the large number of countries involved. Therefore, the conclusion of CJK FTA will be an important boost for the further progress of both RCEP and TPP. It will also be an important stabiliser for the trilateral political relations in the future.

Keywords

China-Japan-South Korea Free Trade Agreement China-centered regional economic integration US-Asia economic relations Trans-Pacific Partnership ASEAN plus three Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership 

References

  1. 1.
    Auslin, M. (2012). Getting its right: Japan and Trans-Pacific Partnership. Asia-Pacific Review, 19 (1), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloomberg (2013). Japan reaches deal with US on joining TPP trade talks, 12 April, 2013 [Online] http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-12/japan-reaches-deal-with-u-s-on-joining-tpp-trade-talks.html (18 April 2013).
  3. 3.
    Breslin, S. (2007). Theorizing East Asian Regionalism(s): New Regionalism and Asia’s Future. In Curley, M. G. and Thomas, N.(Eds), Advancing East Asian Regionalism (pp.26-51). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calder, K. E. (2008). Critical Junctures and the Contours of Northeast Asian Regionalism. In Calder, K. E. and Fukuyama, F. (Eds), East Asian Multilateralism: Prospects for Regional Stability (pp.15-39). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calder, K. and Ye, M. (2010). The Making of Northeast Asia, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CEIC Data. (2011). Macroeconomic Databases for Emerging and Developed Markets. Retrieved from http://www.ceicdata.com/
  7. 7.
    Cheong, I. (2008). The Progress of Korea’s FTA Policy in the Context of Northeast Asian Economic Cooperation. In Park, J., Pempel, T.J. and Roland, G. (Eds), Political Economy of Northeast Asian Regionalism: Political Conflict and Economic Integration (pp.56-66). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi, Y. J. (2008). Northeast Asian regional integration. In Park, J., Pempel, T.J. and Roland G. (Eds), Political Economy of Northeast Asian Regionalism: Political Conflict and Economic Integration (pp.44-55). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper W.H. (2013). US-Japan Economic Relations: Significance, Prospect and Policy Options, 20 February, CRS Report for Congress, pp.1-19.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corning, G. P. (2011). Trade Regionalism in a Realist East Asia: Rival Visions and Competitive Bilateralism. Asian Perspective, 35, 259–286.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cuming, B. (1984). The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Production Cycles and Political Consequences. International Organization, 38(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dooley, M.P., Folkerts-Landau, D. and Garber, P. (2003). An Essay on the Revived Bretton Woods System. NBER Working Paper. [Online] http://www.nber.org/papers/w9971.pdf?new_window=1 (28 June 2013).
  13. 13.
    Du Boff, R.B. (2003). US hegemony: continuing decline, enduring danger. Monthly Review, 55(7), December. [Online] http://monthlyreview.org/2003/12/01/u-s-hegemony-continuing-decline-enduring-danger (28 June 2013).
  14. 14.
    Gilpin, R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Global Post (2013). China, Japan S. Korea conclude first round trade talks. 28 March, 2013 [Online] http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130328/china-japan-s-korea-conclude-first-round-trade-talks (28 March 2013).
  16. 16.
    Gordon, B. K. (2012). Trading up in Asia: Why the United States needs the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Foreign Affairs, July/August, 17–22.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Halevi, J. and Lucarelli, B. (2002). Japan’s Stagnationist Crises, Monthly Review, 53 (9) [Online] http://monthlyreview.org/2002/02/01/japans-stagnationist-crises (28 March 2013).
  18. 18.
    Hatch, W. and Yamamura, K. (1996). Asia in Japan’s Embrace: Building a Regional Production Alliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hayashi, Y. abd Sekiguchi, T. (2012). Japan’s leader turns trade focus to China, South Korea. Wall Street Journal, 12 May 2012 [Online] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304203604577399671944315172.html (28 March 2013).
  20. 20.
    Hsieh, Pasha L. (2011). The China-Taiwan ECFA, Geopolitical Dimensions and WTO Law. Journal of International Economic Law, 14 (1), 121–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ikenberry, G. J. (2004). American Hegemony and East Asia Order. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 58(3), 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The Rise of China and the Future of the West, Can the Liberal System Survive?. Foreign Affairs, January/February.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Inside U.S. Trade (2013), “Tariff Deal Unlikely to Blunt U.S. Automakers’ Opposition to Japan’s TPP Entry”, 31 (22), 30 May.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Inside U.S. Trade (2013), “ GM Distributes Petition Calling for Import Restrictions on Japan in TPP”, 31 (18), 11 JulyGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Joint Report and Policy Recommendations on the Possible Roadmaps of a Free Trade Agreement between China, Japan and Korea (2008). Trilateral Joint Research done by Development Research Center (DRC) of China, National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA) of Japan and Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP) of Korea, December 2008 [Online] http://www.nira.or.jp/pdf/0805report-E.pdf (28June 2013).
  26. 26.
    Joint Study Report for an FTA among China, Japan and Korea (2011) [Online] http://www.meti.go.jp/press/2011/03/20120330027/20120330027-3.pdf (3 September 2012).
  27. 27.
    Joint Study Report for China-Korea FTA. <http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/enarticle/enkorea/enkoreanews/201006/2759_1.html> (accessed 17 December 2012)
  28. 28.
    Kim, J-Y (2008). Financial Cooperation within the ASEAN+3: Viability and prospects. In Park, J., Pempel, T.J. and Roland, G. (Eds), Political Economy of Northeast Asian Regionalism: Political Conflict and Economic Integration (pp.111-129). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kimura, F. and Ando, M. (2008). Economic Obstacles to a Northeast Asian FTA. In Park, J., Pempel, T.J. and Roland, G. (Eds), Political Economy of Northeast Asian Regionalism: Political Conflict and Economic Integration (pp.67-99). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee, S-J (2008). Korean Perspective on East Asian Regionalism. In Calder K. E. and Fukuyama F. (Eds.), East Asian Multilateralism: Prospect for Regional Stability (pp.198-213). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Manyin, M. E., Daggett, S., Dolven, B., Lawrence, S. V., Martin, M. F., O’Rourke, R. and Vaughn, B. (2012). Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s rebalancing toward Asia. CRS Report for Congress, 28 March 2012 [Online] http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42448.pdf (28June 2013).
  32. 32.
    Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China, Statistics.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan Statistical Yearbook 2012 [Online] http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/nenkan/index.htm (3 September 2012).
  34. 34.
    Nolt, J.H. (2005). US-China-Taiwan military relations. Foreign Policy in Focus, 5 (11) [Online] http://www.fpif.org/reports/us-china-taiwan_military_relations (28 June 2013).
  35. 35.
    Okoshi, M. (2012). Skittish about US, China Woos Japan on Free Trade. The Nikkel Asian Review, 11 July.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Petri P.A. and Plummer M.G. (2012). The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific integration: policy implications. Policy Brief, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Number PB12-16, 1–10.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Smith R.L. (2011). Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Current Policy Assessment. KWR Special Report [Online] www.kwrintl.com/library/2011/transpacific.html (5 May 2011).
  38. 38.
    Stubbs R. (2002). ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism? Asian Survey, 42 (3), pp.440-455.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sohn, B.H. (2002). Regionalization of trade and investment in East Asia and prospects for further regional integration. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 7(2), 160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    The Daily Yomiuri (2010). TPP-Opening the door/Japan risks being left behind. 12 November 2010 [Online] http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/business/T101111006172.htm (4 July 2012).
  41. 41.
    Ue, I. (2012). Lee: Onus on Japan to restart FTA talks. The Daily Yomiuri, 13 June 2012. [Online] http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/world/T120612005299.htm (4 July 2012).
  42. 42.
    Uechi, H. and Kouuchi , Y. (2012). South Korea’s Reluctance Clouds FTA/Domestic resistance Throws Prospects for Trilateral Trade Pact into Doubt. The Daily Yomiuri, 15 May 2012 [Online] http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/business/T120514003095.htm (3 July 2012).
  43. 43.
    United Nations (2002). Manual on Statistics of International Trade in Services.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    United Nations (2011). World Investment Report 2011.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    United Nations Service Trade Statistics Database.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Urata, S. (2005). Proliferation of FTAs in East Asia’, paper for PECC Trade Forum, Korea 23–24 May 2005 [Online] www.apec.org.au/docs/koreapapers2/SIX-SU-Paper.pdf (9 July 2012).
  47. 47.
    Van Ness, P. (2001). Hegemony, Not Anarchy: Why China and Japan Are not Balancing US Unipolar Power. Working Paper Department of International Relations, RSPAS, Australian National University. 1–23.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vanel G. (2005). L’économie politique de l’étalon dollar : les Etats-Unis et le nouveau régime financier international. Thèse de Doctorat en Economie Internationale, Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    World Trade Atlas, Global Trade Information Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wu, Xinbo (2012). The Spillover Effect of the ASEAN-Plus-Three Process on East Asian Security”. In Goldstein, A. and Mansfield Edward D. (Eds.). The Nexus of Economics, Security, and International Relations in East Asia (pp.96-119). California: Standard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Xu, C. (2012). Trilateral FTA good for all, China Daily, 14 May 2012 [Online] http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/2012-05/14/content_25375822.htm (4 July 2012).
  52. 52.
    Yamazawa, I. (2003). Toward Closer Japan-Korea Economic Relations in the Twenty-First Century. In Cho, L-J, Kim, Y. H. and Lee, C. H. (Eds.), A Vision for Economic Cooperation in East Asia: China, Japan and Korea (pp.33-61). Korea Development Institute.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yoshimatsu, H. (2008). The Political Economy of Regionalism in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East Asian InstituteNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations