Intra-European Bargaining and the ‘Tower of Babel’ EU Approach to the Burmese Conundrum
- 163 Downloads
Since the 1990 imposition of an arms embargo, the European Union has kept on furthering its sanction policies towards Burma’s military regime in response to its poor record on human rights and authoritarian rule over the country. However, more than a decade after the 1996 EU Common Position on Burma, the European approach to the Burmese conundrum has still failed to achieve its initial objective of facilitating a transition to democracy and of stimulating aid and development in the country. This article seeks to underline the limits of the EU position by highlighting the internal and external obstacles the Europeans have been facing in their policymaking process towards Burma. It is argued that the varied and multiple interests of the 27 EU members; an influential European public opinion favouring an attitude of ostracism; and misunderstandings or miscalculations in appreciating the current state of Burmese affairs have hindered the EU from playing an efficacious role. Moreover these factors also impede its reappraisal.
KeywordsBurma Common position Engagement EU foreign policy Myanmar Ostracism Sanctions
The Author would like to thank the organizers of the 3rd annual EU-NESCA conference held in Brussels on 25-26 November 2008 for their invitation and assistance, as well as David Camroux (CERI-Sciences Po Paris), Mael Raynaud (EBO, Brussels), Andreas List (EU) and the anonymous reviewer for their constructive advice. The views expressed hereafter are his own. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
- 1.AUNG KIN, 1980, “Burma in 1979: Socialism with Foreign Aid and Strict Neutrality”, Southeast Asian Affairs (1980), 93-117.Google Scholar
- 4.EGRETEAU, R. & JAGAN, L., 2008, “Back to the Old Habits: Isolationism or the Self-Preservation of the Burmese Military Regime”, IRASEC Occasional Paper, No. 7 (December).Google Scholar
- 6.HOLLIDAY, I. 2008. “Beyond Burma vs. The World”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 171, 5, (June), 48-51.Google Scholar
- 7.HOUTMAN, G., 1999. Mental Culture in Burmese Crisis Politics: Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy, Tokyo: ILCAA Monograph Series.Google Scholar
- 8.KUDO, T., 2008, “The Impact of the US Sanctions on the Myanmar Garment Industry”, Asian Survey, 48, 6 (November-December), 997-1017.Google Scholar
- 9.PEDERSEN, M., 2000, “International Policy on Burma: Coercion, Persuasion or Cooperation? Assessing the Claims”, in PEDERSEN, M., RUDLAND, E., MAY, R., eds., Burma/Myanmar: Strong Regime, Weak State? London: Crawford Publishing House, 195-240.Google Scholar
- 13.SMITH, M., 1999, Burma: Insurgency and the Politics of Ethnicity, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- 16.TAYLOR, R., 2004, “Myanmar: Roadmap to Where?”, Southeast Asian Affairs, (2004), 171-184.Google Scholar