Advertisement

East Asia

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 187–210 | Cite as

Illusions of Relevance? An Australian Encounter with Malay History and Southeast Asian Security

  • Roger Kershaw
Article
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

A. C. Milner’s visiting inaugural at N.U.S. invites exploration of its author’s intellectual development, for he boldly claims a role for an Australian historian of Southeast Asia as a promoter of liberal governance for Southeast Asian societies, in face of militant Islamism. His earlier “postmodernist” commitment to “getting inside the Malay experience” constitutes some sort of precursor, but relativist scepticism fits as uncomfortably as does, in its own way, advocacy of Australian tolerance of Asian authoritarianism. In attacking Leifer’s Realism, the lecture seems ill-informed, while the post-war Oakeshott is scarcely relevant to the diverse societies of Southeast Asia.

Keywords

A. C. Milner Australia Islamism Malay monarchy M.Leifer Postmodernism Realism S. E. Asia 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, P. (1998) The Origins of Postmodernity, London, Verso.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, P. (2005) Spectrum. From right to left in the world of ideas, London, Verso.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birch, A.H. (1969) “Historical explanation and the study of politics”, Government and Opposition 4, no. 2, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, C. (1999) “Universal human rights: a critique” in Human Rights in Global Politics, ed. T. Dunne, & N.J. Wheeler, Cambridge, C.U.P., pp 103–127.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chin Kin Wah & Suryadinata, L. (eds.) (2005) Michael Leifer. Selected Works on Southeast Asia, Singapore, ISEAS.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collingwood, R.G. (1946) The Idea of History, Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahm, B. (1966) Sukarnos Kampf um Indonesiens Unabhängigkeit. Werdegang und Ideen eines asiatischen Nationalisten, Frankfurt am Main, Alfred Metzner Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donnelly, J. (2000) Realism and International Relations, Cambridge, C.U.P.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evans, R.J. (1997) In Defence of History, London, Granta Books.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freedman, L. (2001) “Whatever happened to the balance of power?”, The World Today, 57, no. 2, 8–12.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goboriau, M. (1970) “Structural anthropology and history” in Structuralism: a Reader, ed. M.Lane, London, Cape, pp 156–169.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gullick, J.M. (1958) Indigenous Political Systems of Western Malaya, London, L.S.E..Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halliday, F. (1994) Rethinking International Relations, London, MacMillan.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ingleson, J. (1999) “Australia in Asia” (review article), Asian Studies Review 23, no. 1, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jones, D.M. (1995) “Postmodernity and political science: a contradiction in terms”, Sojourn 10, no. 1, 7–32.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelly, P.J. (2001) “’Dangerous liaisons’: Parekh and ‘Oakshottian’ multiculturalism”, Political Quarterly 72, no. 4, 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kershaw, R. (1988) “Difficult synthesis: recent trends in Malay political sociology and history” (Review Article), Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 16, no. 1, 134–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kershaw, R. (1989) ”Within the family. The limits of doctrinal differentiation in the Malaysian ruling party election of 1987”, Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs 23, 125–193.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kershaw, R. (2001) Monarchy in South-East Asia. The faces of tradition in transition, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kershaw, R. (2007) “Islam in security perspective: new analysis of Indonesia and its region” (Review Article), Internationales Asienforum 38, nos.1–2, 175–184.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lizée, P. P. (2000) “Civil society and regional security; tensions and potentials in post-crisis Southeast Asia”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 22, no. 3, 550–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahbubani, K. (1993) “The dangers of decadence: what the rest can teach the West”, Foreign Affairs 72, no. 4, 10–14.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milner, A.C. (1977) The Malay Raja. A study of Malay political culture in East Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula in the early nineteenth century (Ph.D. thesis), Ithaca, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Milner, A.C. (1981) “Islam and Malay kingship”, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1, 46–70.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milner, A.C. (1982) KERAJAAN. Malay political culture on the eve of colonial rule, Tucson, University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Milner, A.C. (1986) “Colonial records history: British Malaya,” Kajian Malaysia 4, no. 2, 1–18. Repr. in 1987 Modern Asian Studies 21, no. 4, 773–792.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Milner, A.C. (1993) ”Islamic debate in the public sphere” in The Making of an Islamic Political Discourse in Southeast Asia, ed. A.Reid, Clayton, Monash University, pp 109–126.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Milner, A.C. (1995) The Invention of Politics in Colonial Malaya. Contesting nationalism and the expansion of the public sphere, Cambridge, C.U.P.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Milner, A.C. (2003) Region, Security and the Return of History, Singapore, ISEAS.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Milner, A.C. & Quilter, M. (eds.) (1996; 1996; 1998) Australia in Asia: Vol.1, Comparing Cultures; Vol.2, Communities of Thought; Vol.3, Episodes, Melbourne, O.U.P..Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Muzaffar, C. (1979) Protector?, Penang, Aliran.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oakeshott, M. (1933) Experience and its Modes, Cambridge, C.U.P..Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oakeshott, M. (1962) Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London, Methuen.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Parekh, B. (1999) “Non-ethnocentric universalism” in Human Rights in Global Politics, ed. T.Dunne, & N.J.Wheeler, Cambridge, C.U.P., pp 128–159.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Penna, D.R. & Campbell, P.J. (1998) “Human rights and culture: beyond universality and relativism”, Third World Quarterly 19, no. 1, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Roberts, A. (2001) Obituary, The Independent (9 April).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Roff, W.R. (1967) The Origins of Malay Nationalism, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Simon, S.W. (1995) “Realism and neoliberalism: international relations theory and Southeast Asian security”, Pacific Review 8, no. 1, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Snyder, C.A. (2006) “Southeast Asian perceptions of Australian foreign policy”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 287, no. 2, 322–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tarling, N. (2005) “Further notes on the historiography of British Borneo”, Borneo Research Bulletin 36, 213–228.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Niel, Robert (1960) The Emergence of the Modern Indonesian Elite, The Hague, van Hoeve.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    White, H. (1987) The Content of the Form. Narrative discourse and historical representation, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yahuda, M. (2001) Obituary, L.S.E. News and Views (23 April).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yeo, Kim Wah 1987 “The Milner version of British Malayan history - a rejoinder”, Kajian Malaysia 5, no. 1, 1–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LochinverScotland

Personalised recommendations