East Asia

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 84–118 | Cite as

Media effects on political confidence and trust in the People's Republic of China in the post-Tiananmen period

  • Xueyi Chen
  • Tianjian Shi


Based on a nationwide survey conducted in mainland China between September 1993 and June 1994, this study explores the impact of propaganda of the Communist government on people's attitudes toward specific political institutions and toward the government in general. Our study shows that the news media in China have negative effects on people's attitudes toward political institutions in general and make people distrust government. Several competing interpretations are offered to explain the negative correlation between media exposure and political trust. Despite serious efforts, we are unable to falsify the relationship between media exposure and people's attitudes toward government. These findings clearly demonstrate that the propaganda of the regime failed in nurturing supportive sentiment among people in Chinese society in the post-Tiananmen era.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balch, George I. “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept ‘Sense of Political Efficacy’.” Political Methodology, no. 1 (Spring 1974): 1–43.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, Bernard. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Samuel H., Barbara G. Farah and Felix Heuks. “Personal Disatisfaction”, in Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, eds. Samuel H. Barnes and others, 381–407. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, Samuel H. et al. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, Lee B. and D. Charles Whitney. “Effects of Media Dependencies: Audience Assessment of Government.” Communication Research 7, no. 1 (1980): 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianco, William T.: Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. Brzezinski, Zbigniew and Samuel P. Huntington. Political Power USA/USSR. New York: Viking Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. Cappella, Joseph N and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Spiral of Cynicism the Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, Joseph M. “Commercialization Without Independence: Media Development in China.” China Review 25 (1993): 1–25.Google Scholar
  10. Cialdini, Robert B., Richard E. Petty, and John T. Cacioppo. “Attitude and Attitude Change.” Annual Review of Psychology 32 (1981): 357–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Citrin, Jack. “Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government.” American Political Science Review 68, no. September (1974): 973–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Citrin, Jack and Christopher Muste. “Trust in Government.” in Measures of Political Attitudes, eds. John Robinson, Phillip R. Shaver, and Wrightsman Lawrence S. San Diego: Academic Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Craig, Stephen C., Richard G. Niemi, and Glenn E. Silver. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12, no. 3 (1990): 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crozier, Michel, Samuel P. Huntington and Joji Watanuki. The Crisis of Democracy Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. The Triangle Papers, 8. New York: New York University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. Eagly, Alice Hendrickson and Shelly Chaiken. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. Fallows, James M.. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. 1st ed. New York: Pantheon Books, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. Feldman, Ofer. “Political Attitudes and the News Media in Japan: Effects of Exposure and Attention to the News Media on Political Involvement and Disapprobation.” The Howard Journal of Communications 6, no. 3 (1995): 206–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenno, Richard F. Jr. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1978.Google Scholar
  19. Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Ill: Row, Peterson, 1957.Google Scholar
  20. Fiorina, Morris P. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  21. Friedrich, Carl J. and Zbigniew K. Brzezinski. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  22. Fukuvama, Francis. Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. Gibson, James L. and Raymond M. Duch. “Emerging Democratic Values in Soviet Political Culture.” In Public Opinion and Regime Change: The New Politics of Post-Soviet Societies, eds Arthur H. Miller, William M. Reisinger, and Vicki L Hesli, 69–94. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. Glynn, Carroll J., Herbst Susan, Garrett J. O'Keefe, and Robert Y. Shapiro. Public Opinion. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  25. Hill, Kim Quaile. “Retest Reliability for Trust in Government and Governmental Responsiveness Measures: A Research Note” Political Methodology 8 (1982): 33–46.Google Scholar
  26. Houn, Franklin W. To Change a Nation: Propaganda and Indoctrination in Communist China. Glenoe, New York: Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  27. Hull, Clark Leonard. Principles of Behavior an Introduction to Behavior Theory. The Century Psychology Series. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.Google Scholar
  28. Huntington, Samuel P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman Oklahoma: The University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  29. Kassof, Allen. “The Administered Society: Totalitarianism Without Terror.” World Politics 16, no. July (1964): 558–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lasswell, Harold Dwight. Propaganda Technique in the World War. New York: P. Smith, 1938.Google Scholar
  31. —. Propaganda Technique in World War I. M.I.T. Studies in Comparative Politics: M.I.T. Studies in Comparative Politics Series. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  32. Lasswell, Harold Dwight et al. Propaganda and Promotional Activities: An Annotated Bibliography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  33. Liu, Alan P.L Communications and National Integration in Communist China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  34. Luke, Steven. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan, 1974.Google Scholar
  35. Lynch, Daniel C. After the Propaganda State: Media, Politics, and “Thought Work” in Reformed China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, Arthur H. “Rejoinder to ‘Comment’ by Jack Citrin: Political Discontent or Ritualism?” The American Political Science Review 68 (1974): 989–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —. “Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970.” American Political Science Review 68 (1974a): 951–72, 989–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller, Arthur H., Edie N. Goldenberg, and Lutz Erbring, “Type-Set Politics: Impact of Newspapers on Public Confidence.” The American Political Science Review 73, no. 1 (1979): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, Warren E., Arthur H. Miller, and Edward J. Schneider. American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook, 1952–1978. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  40. Ministry of Public Security. Zhongguo Chengxian Renko Tongji (Population Statistics by City and County of the People's Republic of China). Beijing: Map Publishing House of China, 1987.Google Scholar
  41. Muller, Edward N. A Partial Test of a Theory of Potential for Political Violence.” American Political Science Review 66 (1972): 928–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newton, Kenneth and Nippa Norris. “Confidence in Public Institutes: Faith, Culture, or Performance?” in Disaffected Democracies What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? eds. Susan J Pharr and Robert D Putnam, 52–73. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  43. Nie, Norman H., Bingham G. Powell Jr., and Kenneth Prewitt. “Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships, Part II.” American Political Science Review 63, no. 3 (1969): 808–32.Google Scholar
  44. —. “Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships, Part I.” American Political Science Review 63, no. 2 (1969): 361–78.Google Scholar
  45. Nye, Joseph S., Philip Zelikow, and David C King. Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  46. O'Keefe, Garrett J. “Political Malaise and Reliance on Media.” Journalism Quarterly, no. 57 (1980): 122–28.Google Scholar
  47. Oskamp, Stuart: Attitudes and Opinions Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  48. Paige, Jeffery, “Political Orientation and Riot Participation.” American Sociological Review 36 (1971): 810–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Patterson, Thomas E. Out of Order. 1st ed ed. New York: A. Knopf, 1993.Google Scholar
  50. Petty, Richard E and John T Cacioppo. Attitudes and Persuasion—Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, Iowa: W.C. Brown Co. Publishers, 1981.Google Scholar
  51. Pharr, Susan J and Robert D Putnam. Disaffected Democracies What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  52. Polumbaum, J. “The Tribulations of China's Journalists After a Decade of Reform.” in Voices of China the Interplay of Politics and Journalism Chin-ch an Li, University of Minnesota, and China Times Center for Media and Social Studies, 38–68. New York: Guilford Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, Michael J. “Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of The Selling of the Pentagon.” American Political Science Review 70, no. 2 (1976): 409–32.Google Scholar
  54. Shi, Tianjian. “Survey Research in China,” in Research in Micropolitics, eds Michael X. Delli Carpini, Huddy Leonie, and Robert Y. Shapiro, 213–50. Greenwich, Conn.: JAL Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  55. —. Political Participation in Beijing. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  56. —. “Cultural Values and Democracy in the People's Republic of China,” China Quarterly, no. 162 (June 2000): 547–66.Google Scholar
  57. Shramm, Wilbur. “China's Experience and Development Communication: How Transferable Is It?” in Communication and Development, Chu C. Godwin and others, 85–105. Honolulu: East-West Center, 1976.Google Scholar
  58. Stiff, James B. Persuasive Communication. New York: Guilford Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  59. Thorndike, Edward L and others. The Fundamentals of Learning. New York: Teachers college, Columbia university, 1971.Google Scholar
  60. Weiner, Myron, “Political Participation: Crisis of the Political Process,” In Crisis and Sequences in Political Development, eds. Leonard Binder and others, 159–205. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  61. Wilkins, Karen G. and Benjamin J Bates. “Political Distrust in Hong Kong: News Media Use and Political Beliefs Regarding the 1997 Transition,” Asian Journal of Communication 5, no. 2 (1995): 68–89.Google Scholar
  62. Yu, Frederick T. C. Mass Persuasion in China. New York: Praeger, 1964.Google Scholar
  63. Yu, Jinglu, “The Structure and Function of Chinese Television, 1979–1989.” in Voices of China the Interplay of Politics and Journalism; ed. Chin-chuan Lee, 69–87. New York: Guilford Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  64. Zajonc, Robert B. Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9, no. 2 (1968).Google Scholar
  65. Zhao, Xinshu and others. “Media Effects Under a Monopoly: The Case of Beijing in Economic Reform.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 6, no. 2 (1994): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhao, Yuezhi. Media, Market, and Democracy in China Between the Party Line and the Bottom Line, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  67. Zhu, Jian-Hua. “Information Availability, Source Credibility, and Audience Sophistication: Factors Conditioning the Effects of Communist Propaganda in China.” Indiana University, 1990. (doctoral dissertation)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xueyi Chen
  • Tianjian Shi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations