Advertisement

Acta Analytica

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 385–406 | Cite as

Factory Farming and Ethical Veganism

  • Eugene MillsEmail author
Article

Abstract

The most compelling arguments for ethical veganism hinge on premise-pairs linking the serious wrongness of factory farming to that of buying its products: one premise claiming that buying those products stands in a certain relation to factory farming itself, and one claiming that entering into that relation with a seriously wrong practice is itself wrong. I argue that all such “linkage arguments” on offer fail, granting the serious wrongness of factory farming. Each relevant relation is such that if it holds between factory farming and buying its products, then it holds between some seriously wrong practice and economic transactions of an absurd number and breadth. Hence, all these premise-pairs would, if true, generate unacceptable moral overreach; each premise-pair contains at least one unacceptable member, and the linkage arguments for ethical veganism fail.

Notes

Acknowledgements

My chief debt is to those whose arguments I criticize—especially Mylan Engel and Alastair Norcross, with whom I have had productive conversations. A fission-ancestor of this paper was presented at the 2018 Bled Conference on Ethics. I’m grateful to the chief conference organizers (Friderik Klampfer and Justin Weinberg) for spurring me to write the ancestral paper, to the conference participants for spurring me to bifurcate it, and to all of the above and an anonymous referee for prompting the improvement of this fissiondescendant.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cherry, J., Feairheller, S., Foglia, T., Piazza, G., Maerker, G., Woychik, J., & Komanowski, M. (1992). Innovative uses of animal byproducts. In New crops, new uses, new markets: Industrial and commercial products from U.S. agriculture, 1992 yearbook of agriculture, 193–198. Office of Publishing and Visual Communication, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  2. Engel, M. J. (2000). The Immorality of Eating Meat. In L. Pojman (Ed.), The moral life: An introductory reader in ethics and literature (pp. 856–889). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Francione, G. (2000). Introduction to animal rights: Your child or the dog. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Guo, J. (2015). So many things you wouldn’t expect are made with animal parts. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from WashingtonPost.com: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/06/so-many-things-you-wouldnt-expect-are-made-with-animal-parts/?utm_term=.625e6d41362e.
  5. Hudson, H. (1993). Collective responsibility and moral vegetarianism. Journal of Social Philosophy, 24(2), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. International Labour Organization and Walk Free Foundation. (2017). Global estimates of modern slavery: Forced labour and forced marriage. Geneve: International Labour Office. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-dgreports/%2D%2D-dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_575479.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018.
  7. Jayathilakan, K., Sultana, K., Radhakrishna, K., & Bawa, A. (2012). Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(3), 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kazez, J. (2018). The taste question in animal ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 35(4), 661–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kru, E. (2018). 10 everyday items that contain animal products. RaiseVegan.com: https://raisevegan.com/10-everyday-items-that-contain-animal-products/. Accessed 19 Apr 2018 from.
  10. Lomasky, L. (2013). Is it wrong to eat animals? Social Philosophy and Policy, 30(1–2), 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McClure, A. (2014). The Many Uses of a Cow—Beef By-Products. Retrieved 19 April 2018 from Cattle-Empire.net: http://www.cattle-empire.net/blog/123/many-uses-cow-beef-products.
  12. McPherson, T. (2014). A case for ethical veganism. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 11(6), 677–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McPherson, T. (2018). The ethical basis for veganism. In A. Barnhill, T. Doggett, & M. Budolfson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of food ethics (pp. 209–240). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mills, E. (2018). A Defense of Ethical Flexitarianism. Presented at the 2018 Bled Conference on Ethics, 7 June 2018, Bled, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  15. Norcross, A. (2004). Puppies, pigs and people: Eating meat and marginal cases. Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norcross, A. (2006). The scalar approach to utilitarianism. In H. West (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to Mill’s utilitarianism (pp. 217–232). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Rabin, R. C. (2016). Special Diets Can Heighten Tensions at the Holiday Dinner Table. Retrieved 30 April 2018, from www.nytimes.com: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/well/family/special-diets-can-heighten-tensions-at-the-holiday-dinner-table.html.
  18. Rachels, J. (1977). Vegetarianism and “the other weight problem”. In W. Aiken & H. La Follette (Eds.), World hunger and moral obligation (pp. 180–193). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Regan, T. (1982). The moral basis of vegetarianism. In All that dwell therein (pp. 1–39). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.Google Scholar
  21. Sterbenz, C. (2014). 13 Surprising Things That Are Partly Made From Animal Products. Retrieved 30 April 2018 from BusinessInsider.com: https://www.businessinsider.com/15-surprising-things-that-contain-animal-products-2014-3.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations