Acta Analytica

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 457–468

The Problem of Massive Deception for Justification Norms of Action

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s12136-014-0220-1

Cite this article as:
Logins, A. Acta Anal (2014) 29: 457. doi:10.1007/s12136-014-0220-1
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, I argue against recent versions of justification norms of action and practical deliberation (Neta, Noûs 43:684–699, 2009; Gerken, Synthese 178:529–547, 2011, Synthese 189:373–394, 2012; Smithies, Noûs 46:265–288, 2012). I demonstrate that these norms yield unacceptable results in deception cases. However, a further modification of justification norms in the light of these results appears to be ad hoc. Hence, I claim, we should reject justification norms of action and practical deliberation.

Keywords

Knowledge Justification Action Practical deliberation Norms 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de philosophieUniversité de GenèveGenèveSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations