Trenton Merricks has argued that given endurantism personal identity is unanalysable in terms of psychological continuity, while Anthony Brueckner has argued against this claim. This article shows that neither philosopher has made a compelling case and also shows what it would take to settle the issue either way. It is then argued that whether personal identity is analysable or not may not be of crucial importance to those wanting to defend a psychological continuity approach to personal identity.
KeywordsPersonal identity Endurantism Trenton Merricks Psychological continuity theory
- Grice, P. (1975). Personal identity. In J. Perry (Ed.), Personal identity (pp. 73–95). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar