Acta Analytica

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 309–316 | Cite as

Is Personal Identity Analysable?

Article

Abstract

Trenton Merricks has argued that given endurantism personal identity is unanalysable in terms of psychological continuity, while Anthony Brueckner has argued against this claim. This article shows that neither philosopher has made a compelling case and also shows what it would take to settle the issue either way. It is then argued that whether personal identity is analysable or not may not be of crucial importance to those wanting to defend a psychological continuity approach to personal identity.

Keywords

Personal identity Endurantism Trenton Merricks Psychological continuity theory 

References

  1. Brueckner, A. (2009). Endurantism and the psychological approach to personal identity. Theoria, 75, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Grice, P. (1975). Personal identity. In J. Perry (Ed.), Personal identity (pp. 73–95). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Merricks, T. (1998). There are no criteria of identity over time. Noûs, 32, 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Merricks, T. (1999). Endurance, psychological continuity, and the importance of personal identity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59, 983–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Olson, E. (2007). What are we? New York: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Zimmerman, D. (1998). Criteria of identity and the ‘identity mystics’. Erkenntnis, 48, 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations