Acta Analytica

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 343–353 | Cite as

On the Reason View of Freedom and Semi-Compatibilism



Alternative possibilities Moral obligation Reasons Responsibility Semi-compatibilism 



I thank the members of the 18th Bled Philosophical Conference for their helpful comments. This paper was written during my tenure of a 2008–2011 Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Grant. I am most grateful to this granting agency for its support.


  1. Arpaly, N. (2006). Merit, meaning, and human bondage: an essay on free will. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Broome, J. (2004). Reasons. In P. Pettit, S. Scheffler, M. Smith, & R. J. Wallace (Eds.), Reason and value: essays on the moral philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Copp, D. (1997). Defending the principle of alternate possibilities: blameworthiness and moral responsibility. Nous, 31, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Copp, D. (2003). ‘Ought’ implies ‘can’, blameworthiness, and the principle of alternate possibilities. In D. Widerker & M. McKenna (Eds.), Moral responsibility and alternative possibilities (pp. 265–299). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Feldman, F. (1986). Doing the best we can. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman, F. (1990). A simpler solution to the paradoxes of deontic logic. Philosophical Perspectives, 4, 309–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fields, L. (1994). Moral beliefs and blameworthiness. Philosophy, 69, 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, J. M. (2006). My way: essays on moral responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, J. M. (2007). Compatibilism. In J. M. Fischer, R. Kane, D. Pereboom, & M. Vargas (Eds.), Four views on free will. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, R. (1998). Responsibility and control: a theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mele, A. (2003). Motivation and agency. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Schroeder, M. (2007). Reasons and agent-neutrality. Philosophical Studies, 135, 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, H. (1991). Varieties of moral worth and moral credit. Ethics, 101, 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vranas, P. B. M. (2007). I ought, therefore I can. Philosophical Studies, 136, 167–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Widerker, D. (1991). Frankfurt on ‘ought implies can’ and alternative possibilities. Analysis, 51, 222–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Williams, B. (1981). Internal and external reasons. In Moral luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Wolf, S. (1980). Asymmetrical freedom. Journal of Philosophy, 77, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wolf, S. (1990). Freedom within reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Zimmerman, M. J. (1996). The concept of moral obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zimmerman, M. J. (2008). Living with uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations