“Homeland-Rooted” or Acquired in the Receiving Society: How Does the Composition of Migrants’ “Co-Ethnic” Ties Affect Their Patterns of Integration?

  • Evgeni VarshaverEmail author
  • Anna Rocheva


Contributing to literature on composition of social ties of migrants, this article argues that “co-ethnic” ties, often included into analysis as a homogeneous entity, are either the ones obtained in the sending society, thus connecting a migrant to his relatives and neighbors from the community of origin, or the ones acquired in the receiving society and connecting people from different parts of the sending country. Basing on results of a survey of Kyrgyz migrants in Moscow, the authors show that this distinction is associated with difference in patterns, such as economic advancement, attitude toward ethnic category of belonging, and remitting behavior, which together comprise specific modes of integration for migrants. The explanations of these differences are suggested. Also, the mechanism of change of prevalent type of co-ethnic ties in migrants’ ego-networks from “homeland-rooted” to acquired in the receiving society is described.


Social ties Social networks Ego-networks Migration Integration Russia Kyrgyz migrants Moscow 



  1. Agassi, J. (1960). Methodological individualism. The British Journal of Sociology, 11(3), 244–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsler, S. (2009). Promising Futures? Education as a Symbolic Resource of Hope in Kyrgyzstan. Europe-Asia Studies, 61(7), 1189–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. (1994). Methodological individualism and social knowledge. American Economic Review, 84(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  4. Bhugra, D., & Jones, P. (2001). Migration and mental illness. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 70(3), 216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böcker, A. G. M. (1994). Chain migration over legally closed borders: settled immigrants as bridgeheads and gatekeepers. The Netherlands' Journal of Social Sciences, 30, 87–106.Google Scholar
  6. Brednikova, O., & Pachenkov, O. (2002). Ethnicity of the “ethnical economics” and social networks of migrants. Journal of Economic Sociology, 3(2), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunarska, Z., Nestorowicz, J. & Markowski, S. (2014). Intra- vs. extra-regional migration in the post-Soviet space. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(2), 133–155.Google Scholar
  8. Calvó-Armengol, A., & Jackson, M. (2004). The effects of social networks on employment and inequality. American Economic Review, 94(3), 426–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassarino, J. (2004). Theorising return migration: the conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6(2), 253–279.Google Scholar
  10. Chiswick, B., & Miller, P. (1990). Language in the labor market: the immigrant experience in Canada and the United States.Google Scholar
  11. Chiswick, B., & Miller, P. (1996). Ethnic networks and language proficiency among immigrants. Journal of Population Economics, 9(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiswick, B., & Wang, Z. (2016). Social contacts, Dutch language proficiency and immigrant economic performance in the Netherlands: a longitudinal study. IZA discussion paper no. 9760.Google Scholar
  13. Choldin, H. (1973). Kinship networks in the migration process. International Migration Review, 7(2), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chudinovskikh, O., & Denisenko, M. (2014). Population mobility in the commonwealth of independent states: whither common migration policy? Warsaw: Centre of Migration Research, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
  15. Curley, A. (2009). Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2–3), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dai, F., Wang, K., & Teo, S. (2011). Chinese immigrants in network marketing business in Western host country context. International Business Review, 20(6), 659–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demintseva, E. (2017). Labour migrants in post-Soviet Moscow: patterns of settlement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(15), 2556–2572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drever, A., & Hoffmeister, O. (2008). Immigrants and social networks in a job-scarce environment: the case of Germany. International Migration Review, 42(2), 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: a study in sociology [1897]. Translated by J.A. Spaulding and G. Simpson. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dustmann, C., & Fabbri, F. (2003). Language proficiency and labour market performance of immigrants in the UK. The Economic Journal, 113(489), 695–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edin, P., Fredriksson, P., & Aslund, O. (2003). Ethnic enclaves and the economic success of immigrants—evidence from a natural experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 329–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ergeshbaev, U., & Eshenova, S. (2016). Problems of international labor migration of population of Kyrgyzstan [Problemy vneshney trudovoy migratsii naseleniya Kyrgyzstana]. Narodonaseleniye, 1-1(71-1), 34–41.Google Scholar
  23. Espinosa, K., & Massey, D. (1997). Determinants of English proficiency among Mexican migrants to the United States. International Migration Review, 31(1), 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eve, M. (2010). Integrating via networks: foreigners and others. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(7), 1231–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Federal Migration Service (Russian Federation) (2015). Accessed 30 January 2016.
  26. Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (1999). Political participation and political trust in Amsterdam: civic communities and ethnic networks. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25(4), 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gidengil, E., & Stolle, D. (2009). The role of social networks in immigrant women’s political incorporation. International Migration Review, 43(4), 727–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gill, N., & Bialski, P. (2011). New friends in new places: network formation during the migration process among Poles in the UK. Geoforum, 42(2), 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenwell, L., Valdez, R., & DaVanzo, J. (1997). Social ties, wages, and gender in a study of Salvadorean and Pilipino immigrants in Los Angeles. Social Science Quarterly, 78(2), 559–577.Google Scholar
  31. Grieco, E. (1998). The effects of migration on the establishment of networks: caste disintegration and reformation among the Indians of Fiji. International Migration Review, 32(3), 704–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haug, S. (2008). Migration networks and migration decision-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(4), 585–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hüwelmeier, G. (2013). Creating and refining boundaries – church splitting among pentecostal Vietnamese migrants in Berlin. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47(2), 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. International Federation for Human Rights (2019). Women and children from Kyrgyzstan affected by migration. An exacerbated vulnerability. Kyrgyzstan. Accessed 8 November 2019.
  35. Ivahnjuk, I. (2012). Eurasian migration system: from economic pragmatism to revival of civilizational unity [Evrazijskaja Migracionnaja Sistema: Ot Jekonomicheskogo Pragmatizma K Vozrozhdeniju Civilizacionnogo Edinstva]. Center of Lev Gumilev. Accessed 6 February 2018.
  36. Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., Jaakkola, M., & Reuter, A. (2006). Perceived discrimination, social support networks, and psychological well-being among three immigrant groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(3), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirmayer, L., Narasiah, L., Munoz, M., Rashid, M., Ryder, A., Guzder, J., et al. (2011). Common mental health problems in immigrants and refugees: general approach in primary care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 183(12), E959–E967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kochkin, E., Rocheva, A., & Varshaver, E. (2014). Ethnic market of the Moscow service sector: case of Kyrgyz commercial companies. Marketing Services, 4, 284–292.Google Scholar
  39. Kohlbacher, J., Reeger, U., & Schnell, P. (2015). Place attachment and social ties—migrants and natives in three urban settings in Vienna. Population, Space and Place, 21(5), 446–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kornienko, O., Agadjanian, V., Menjívar, C., & Zotova, N. (2017). Financial and emotional support in close personal ties among Central Asian migrant women in Russia. Social Networks. Scholar
  41. Kultaeva, A. (2013). Migrants should not expect benefits of joining the Eurasian customs union [Migrantam ne sleduyet zhdat' preimushchestv ot vstupleniya v Tamozhennyy soyuz]. Accessed 9 Jan 2020.
  42. Kuo, W., & Tsai, Y. (1986). Social networking, hardiness and immigrant's mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27(2), 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kyrgyzstan—People (2019). Accessed 8 November 2019.
  44. Laruelle, M. (2007). Central Asian labor migrants in Russia: the ‘diasporization’ of the Central Asian states? The China and Eurasia Forum Quaterly, 5(3), 101–119.Google Scholar
  45. Leech, N., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Light, I., Bhachu, P., & Karageorgis, S. (2017). Migration networks and immigrant entrepreneurship. In I. Light & P. Bhachu (Eds.), Immigration and entrepreneurship: culture, capital, and ethnic networks (pp. 25–50). London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu, Y., Li, Z., & Breitung, W. (2012). The social networks of new-generation migrants in China’s urbanized villages: a case study of Guangzhou. Habitat International, 36(1), 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Logan, J., Zhang, W., & Alba, R. (2002). Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lubbers, M., Molina, J., & McCarty, C. (2007). Personal networks and ethnic identifications: the case of migrants in Spain. International Sociology, 22(6), 721–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lubbers, M., Molina, J., Lerner, J., Brandes, U., Ávila, J., & McCarty, C. (2010). Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain. Social Networks, 32(1), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. MacDonald, J., & MacDonald, L. (1964). Chain migration ethnic neighborhood formation and social networks. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 42(1), 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mak, A., & Nesdale, D. (2001). Migrant distress: the role of perceived racial discrimination and coping resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(12), 2632–2647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Massey, D. (1987). Understanding Mexican migration to the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1372–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Massey, D. (1989). Economic development and international migration in comparative perspective. Washington, D.C.: Commission for the Study of International Migration and Cooperative Economic Development.Google Scholar
  55. Massey, D., & Espana, F. (1987). The social process of international migration. Science, 237(4816), 733–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Massey, D., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. (1993). Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McMichael, C., & Manderson, L. (2004). Somali women and well-being: social networks and social capital among immigrant women in Australia. Human Organization, 63(1), 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Menjívar, C., & Abrego, D. (2009). Across generations: Immigrant families in America in N. Foner (Ed.), Parents and children across borders. New York and London: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  59. Migration and Remittances Data. (2015). World Bank. Accessed 7 February 2018.
  60. Mitchell, J. (1956). The Kalela dance: aspects of social relationship amongst urban African in northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mollenhorst, G., Edling, C., & Rydgren, J. (2015). Psychological well-being and brokerage in friendship networks of young Swedes. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 897–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mooney, M. (2003). Migrants' social ties in the U.S. and investment in Mexico. Social Forces, 81(4), 1147–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morales, L., & Giugni, M. (2011). Social capital, political participation and migration in Europe: making multicultural democracy work? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moroşanu, L. (2016). Professional bridges: migrants’ ties with natives and occupational advancement. Sociology, 50(2), 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Munshi, K. (2003). Networks in the modern economy: Mexican migrants in the U.S. labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 549–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Murphy, E., & Mahalingam, R. (2004). Transnational ties and mental health of Caribbean immigrants. Journal of Immigrant Health, 6(4), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nasritdinov, E. (2017). Effect of Kyrgyzstan's accession to Eurasian Economic Union on the life of Kyrgyz migrants in the Russian Federation. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Accessed 6 February 2018.
  68. Nguyen, L., Yeoh, B., & Toyota, M. (2006). Migration and the well-being of the ‘left behind’ in Asia: key themes and trends. Asian Population Studies, 2(1), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Paoli, L. (2003). Mafia brotherhoods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Philpott, S. (1968). Remittance obligations, social networks and choice among Montserratian migrants in Britain. Man, 3(3), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2005). Introduction: the second generation and the children of immigrants longitudinal study. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(6), 983–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Poverty in the Kyrgyz Republic. (2017). Accessed 8 November 2019.
  74. Prell, C. (2015). Social network analysis: history, theory and methodology. Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage.Google Scholar
  75. Rivera-Batiz, F. (1990). English language proficiency and the economic progress of immigrants. Economics Letters, 34(3), 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Reeves, M. (2012). Black Work, Green Money: Remittances, Ritual, and Domestic Economies in Southern Kyrgyzstan. Slavic Review, 71(1), 108–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rocheva, A. (2015). Research of “tenant career” positions and housing models of migrants from Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan in Moscow. Sociological Journal, 2, 31–50.Google Scholar
  78. Rocheva, A., & Varshaver, E. (2017). Gender dimension of migration from Central Asia to the Russian Federation. Asia-Pacific Population, 35(2), 87–135.Google Scholar
  79. Russian Census of 2010. (2018). Accessed 1 November 2018.
  80. Ryan, L. (2011). Migrants' social networks and weak ties: accessing resources and constructing relationships post-migration. The Sociological Review, 59(4), 707–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ryan, L., Sales, R., Tilki, M., & Siara, B. (2008). Social networks, social support and social capital: the experiences of recent Polish migrants in London. Sociology, 42(4), 672–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schmidt, M., & Sagynbekova, L. (2008). Migration past and present: changing patterns in Kyrgyzstan. Central Asian Survey, 27(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schwarzweller, H. (1964). Parental family ties and social integration of rural to urban migrants. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26(4), 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simmel, G. (1971). The metropolis and mental life [1903]. In D. Levine (Ed.), On individuality and social forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  86. Sitnyansky, G. (2009). Eurasian herders have a choice. Problems of modernization of traditional cattle breeding of the Kyrgyz [Yevraziyskiye skotovody pered vyborom. Problemy modernizatsii traditsionnogo skotovodstva kirgizov]. In N. Grigulevich, N. Dubova, & A. Yamskova (Eds.), Ethnos and habitat [Etnos i sreda obitaniya] (pp. 259–281).Google Scholar
  87. Smith, S., McFarland, D., Van Tubergen, F., & Maas, I. (2016). Ethnic composition and friendship segregation: differential effects for adolescent natives and immigrants. American Journal of Sociology, 121(4), 1223–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sodnompilova, M., & Nanzatov, B. (2013). Motives for the migration of citizens of Kyrgyzstan to Russia [Motivyi Migratsii Grazhdan Kyirgyizstana V Rossiyu]. In P. Varnavskiy (Ed.), From Asia to Siberia or in search of the “New World” (The position of labor migrants from Central Asia in Baikal Siberia) (pp. 11–60). Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of the Buryat Science Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  89. Stevens, M. (2009). Creating a class. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Thomas, W., & Znaniecki, F. (2006). The Polish peasant in Europe and America [1918]. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  91. Tilly, C. (1990). Transplanted networks in V. Yans-McLaughlin (Ed.), Immigration reconsidered: history, sociology, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Tilly, C., & Brown, C. (1967). On uprooting, kinship, and the auspices of migration. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 8(2), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tonnies, F. (1957). Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft (Community and society) [1887]. Ed. and tr. by C. P. Loomis. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  94. van Rooij, F., van Balen, F., & Hermanns, J. (2006). Migrants and the meaning of parenthood: involuntary childless Turkish migrants in The Netherlands. Human Reproduction, 21(7), 1832–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Varshaver, E., & Rocheva, A. (2018). Localized migrant communities in the absence of ethnic neighbourhoods: a glimpse into Moscow’s ethnic cafés. Urbanities—Journal of Urban Ethnography, 8(2), 42–58.Google Scholar
  96. Varshaver, E., Rocheva, A., Kochkin, E., & Kuldina, E. (2014). Kyrgyz migrants in Moscow: results of a quantitative research on integration tracks. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  97. Velayutham, S., & Wise, A. (2005). Moral economies of a translocal village: obligation and shame among South Indian transnational migrants. Global Networks, 5(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vendina, O. (2002). Social polarization and ethnic segregation in Moscow. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 43(3), 216–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vervoort, M. (2011). Ethnic concentration in the neighbourhood and ethnic minorities’ social integration: weak and strong social ties examined. Urban Studies, 49(4), 897–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Viruell-Fuentes, E., & Schulz, A. (2009). Toward a dynamic conceptualization of social ties and context: implications for understanding immigrant and Latino health. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2167–2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Viry, G., Ganjour, O., Gauthier, J., Ravalet, E., & Widmer, E. (2017). Analysing the role of social visits on migrants’ social capital: a personal network approach. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Warner, W., & Srole, L. (1945). The social systems of American ethnic groups. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Waters, M. (1994). Ethnic and racial identities of second-generation black immigrants in New York City. International Migration Review, 28(4), 795–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wegener, B. (1991). Job mobility and social ties: social resources, prior job, and status attainment. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. White, A., & Ryan, L. (2008). Polish ‘temporary’ migration: the formation and significance of social networks. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(9), 1467–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zhanakeeva, A. (2019). The problem of the collectivization of agriculture of Kyrgyzstan in historical science. Problema kollektivizatsii sel'skogo khozyaystva Kyrgyzstana v istoricheskoy nauke. Bilim Zhana Tarbiya. El Aralyk Kuvejt Universitetinin Ilimij-Pedagogikalyk Zhurnaly, 1(27), 76–80.Google Scholar
  108. Zimmer, C., & Aldrich, H. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. Sexton & R. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Presidential Academy for National Economy and Public AdministrationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations