Advertisement

Integration and Exclusion at Work: Latvian and Swedish Agency Nurses in Norway

  • Hege Merete KnutsenEmail author
  • Katrine Fangen
  • Oksana Žabko
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Qualitative interviews with Latvian and Swedish agency nurses in Norway reveal that the two groups have quite different experiences of integration in the Norwegian labor market. Aiming to add knowledge about differentiation within migrant labor markets, the objective of this article is to examine how language, nursing culture, and personal motivation affect the double control that agency nurses are subject to, their resultant skill-sets, inclusion in the workplace, and response to this. Norway is of interest as the Norwegian language can be difficult to learn outside Scandinavia. The Latvian agency nurses are harder hit by the double control of the temporary work agencies than the Swedish are. They obtain higher wages and better working conditions and are ready to speak up against unfair treatment. If they want to leave the agency, they easily find direct employment. Latvian nurses seem more ready to accept work below their qualifications and some show signs of “resigned acceptance.” They have more to lose than the Swedish nurses in terms of access to work, wages, and working conditions if they return to their homeland. Although Latvian and Swedish nurses largely feel well received in the workplace, the double control they are subject to calls for self-restraint and impedes a sense of inclusion. For the Latvian nurses, language problems and cultural differences exacerbate this. The study expands and nuances how double control affects agency workers, and applying a broad concept of resigned acceptance it nuances what language means for discrimination in the workplace.

Keywords

Agency nurses De-skilling Double control Migrant nurses Norway Resigned acceptance 

Notes

Funding Information

We are thankful to the Research Council of Norway for funding as part of the research project: The impact of temporary work agencies on the politics of work. Ref. 227021.

References

  1. Allan, H. T., & Westwood, S. (2016). English language skills requirements for internationally educated nurses working in the care industry: barriers to UK registration or institutionalised discrimination? Editorial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 54, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltic Institute of Social Science (2016). Qualitative study on health system bottlenecks in Latvia. World Bank. http://www.vmnvd.gov.lv/uploads/files/5746bc728b03e.pdf. Accessed Sept 2017.
  3. Batnitzky, A., & McDowell, L. (2011). Migration, nursing, institutional discrimination and emotional/affective labour: ethnicity and labour stratification in the UK National Health Service. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(2), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berge, Ø. M., Falkum, E., Trygstad, S. C., & Ødegård, A. M. (2011). Skaff oss dem vi trenger (Om arbeidskraftstrategier og forebygging av sosial dumping i helse og omsorg. Fafo-rapport 2011:20). Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
  5. Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchan, J., Jobanputra, R., Gough, P., Hutt R. (2005). Internationally recruited nurses in London. In: Profile and implications for policy. King’s fund working paper, September. London: King’s Fund.Google Scholar
  7. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2017). Average and real monthly wages and salaries. http://www.csb.gov.lv/en/statistikas-temas/metodologija/average-and-real-monthly-wages-and-salaries-36647.html. Accessed Oct 2017.
  8. De Ruyter, A., Kirkpatrick, I., Hoque, K., Lonsdale, C., & Malan, J. (2008). Agency working and degradation of public service employment: the case of nurses and social workers. The International Journal of Human Resources and Management, 19(3), 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fangen, K. (2010). Social exclusion and inclusion of young immigrants. Young, 18(2), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fangen, K., & Paasche, E. (2013). Young adults of ethnic minority background on the Norwegian labour market: the interactional co-construction of exclusion by employers and customers. Ethnicities, 13(5), 607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gautun, H., Øien, H., Bratt, C. (2016). Underbemanning er selvforsterkende. Konsekvenser av mangel på sykepleiere i hjemmesykepleien og sykehjem. NOVA-report 6/2016. http://www.hioa.no/Om-OsloMet/Senter-for-velferds-og-arbeidslivsforskning/NOVA/Publikasjonar/Rapporter/2016/Underbemanning-er-selvforsterkende. Accessed March 2019.
  12. Gottfried, H. (1991). Mechanisms of control in the temporary help service industry. Sociological Forum, 6(4), 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gottfried, H. (1992). In the margins: flexibility as a mode of regulation in the temporary help service industry. Work, Employment and Society, 6(3), 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hull, M. (2016). Medical language proficiency: a discussion of interprofessional language competencies and potential for language risks. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 54, 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jose, M. M. (2010). Lived experiences of internationally educated nurses in hospitals in the United States of America. International Nursing Review, 58(1), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiil, M.B. (2015). Midlertidighet som protest: Svenske sykepleiere og det norske arbeidsmarkedet. Master thesis in Human Geography, University of Oslo. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/56/browse?value=Kiil%2C+Maiken+Bjerga&type=author (Accessed December 2018)Google Scholar
  17. Kiil, M. B., & Knutsen, H. M. (2016). Agency by exit: Swedish nurses and the ‘Not below 24, 000’- movement. Geoforum, 70, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larsen, J. A. (2007). Embodiment of discrimination and overseas nurses’ career progression. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(12), 2187–2195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lember, M., & Nool, I. (2012). Changing brain drain to brain circulation: how to secure enough PHC resources in the BSR. Professional Development, EU: Baltic Sea Region Programme.Google Scholar
  20. Lloyd, L., Banerjee, A., Harrington, C., Jacobsen, F., & Szebehely, M. (2014). It is a scandal! Comparing the causes and consequences of nursing home media scandals in five countries. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(1/2), 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magnusdottir, H. (2005). Overcoming strangeness and communication barriers: a phenomenological study of becoming a foreign nurse. International Nursing Review, 52(4), 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marcus, K., Short, S., & Nardi, B. (2014). “Hardworkers”: Filipino nurses’ professional practice in Queensland. Asia and Pacific Journal of Health Management, 9(1), 28–34.Google Scholar
  23. National Nursing Research Unit (2014). Nurse migration from the EU: what are the key challenges? Policy. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/nursing/research/nnru/policy/by-issue-number/policy%2D%2Dissue-42.pdf. Accessed March 2017.
  24. NAV (2017). Bedriftsundersøkelsen våren 2017 (pdf) The labour and welfare directorate, Oslo (accessed June 2017).Google Scholar
  25. Newton, S., Pillay, J., & Higginbottom, G. (2012). The migration and transitioning experiences of internationally educated nurses: a global perspective. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(4), 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. NSF (2018) Utfordrende å rekruttere sykepleiere. Norwegian Nurses Association. https://www.nsf.no/vis-artikkel/3741618/17036/Utfordrende-aa-rekruttere-sykepleiere. Accessed Dec 2018.
  27. O’Neill, F. (2011). From language classroom to clinical context: the role of language and culture in communication of nurses using English as a second language. A thematic analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(9), 1120–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Primeau, M.-D., Champagne, F., & Lavoie-Tremblay, M. (2014). Foreign-trained nurses’ experiences and socioprofessional integration. Best practices. An integrative literature review. The Health Care Manager, 33(3), 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raghuram, P. (2007). Interrogating the language of integration: the case of internationally recruited nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(12), 2246–2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shohamy, E. (2009). Language tests for immigrants: Why language? Why tests? Why citizenship? In G. Hogan-Brun, C. Mar-Molinero, & P. Stevenson (Eds.), Discourses on language and integration (pp. 45–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skjøstad, O., Hjemås, G, Beyrer, S. (2017). 1 av 5 nyutdanna sykepleiere jobber ikke helsetjensten. https://www.ssb.no/helse/artikler-og-publikasjoner/1-av-5-nyutdanna-sykepleiere-jobber-ikke-i-helsetjenesten. Accessed Nov 2017.
  32. Smith, P., & Mackintosh, M. (2007). Profession, market and class: nurse migration and the remaking of division and disadvantage. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(12), 2213–2220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Statistics Norway (2016). Helse-og sosialpersonell 2015, 4. kvartal. https://www.ssb.no/arbeid-og-lonn/statistikker/hesospers/aar/2016-06-27?fane=tabell&sort=nummer&tabell=270653. Accessed March 2017.
  34. Statistics Norway Databank (2017). Wages nurse, wages specialist nurses. https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/SelectVarVal/Define.asp?MainTable=NaerHelseYrk2&KortNavnWeb=lonnhelse&PLanguage=0&checked=true. Accessed March 2017.
  35. Sykepleien (2015). Liten nytte av å melde avvik. https://sykepleien.no/2015/03/1-av-2-ser-ikke-nytten-av-melde. Accessed March 2017.
  36. Tailby, S. (2005). Agency and bank nursing in the UK National Health Service. Work, Employment and Society, 19(2), 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tuttas, C. A. (2015). Perceived racial and ethnic prejudice and discrimination experiences of minority migrant nurses: a literature review. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 26(5), 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Widding Isaksen, L. (2012). Transnational spaces of care: migrant nurses in Norway. Social Politics, 19(1), 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Young, A., & Temple, B. (2014). Approaches to social research: the case of deaf studies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zampoukos, K., Knutsen, H. M., Kiil, M. B., & Olofsdotter, G. (2018). Mobile with an agency: negotiating the spatiotemporalities of the temp migrant worker. Geoforum, 93, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Human GeographyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Baltic Institute of Social SciencesRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations