The Securitization of the Syrian Refugee Crisis Through Political Party Discourses

  • Recep GulmezEmail author


The present study investigates major Turkish political party discourses about the Syrian refugees in Turkey based on parties’ manifestoes and pamphlets. The refugee problem increased nationalist feelings in Turkey specifically when the president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, explained that the Syrians could be naturalized. To analyse this situation, we draw on theories on securitization and xenophobia. Political party discourses were analysed by Nvivo 11 software program. The results suggest that while the Justice and Development Party (AKP) uses historical–cultural and Islamic discourses, the CHP has an economic discourse. The MHP, the Turkish nationalist party, and the HDP, the Kurdish nationalist party, both deploy nationalist discourses. Members of the CHP claim that the Syrians are the source of major crimes and unemployment. The AKP adopts an Ensar–Muhacir (guest–host) discourse because of its Islamic approach to the refugees. Political parties in Turkey securitize the Syrian refugee crisis through their political discourses, which result in the rise of xenophobia in Turkey. The study suggests that political parties lead to the rise in anti-refugee attitude.


Political party discourse Securitization Turkey Syrian refugee crisis Xenophobia 



  1. Akdogan, Y. (2003). Muhafazakar Demokrasi. Ankara: AK Parti Yayını.Google Scholar
  2. Aktürk, Ş. (2017a). Post-imperial democracies and new projects of nationhood in Eurasia: transforming the nation through migration in Russia and Turkey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(7), 1101–1120. Scholar
  3. Aktürk, Ş. (2017b). Turkey’s role in the Arab spring and the Syrian conflict. Turkish policy quarterly, 15(4), 87–96.Google Scholar
  4. Altundeğer, N., & Yılmaz, E. (2016). İç Savaştan Bölgesel İstikrarsızlığa: Suriye Krizinin Türkiye’ye Faturası. Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 289–301.Google Scholar
  5. Altunışık, M., & Çuhadar, E. (2010). Turkey’s search for a third party role in Arab-Israeli conflicts: a neutral facilitator or a principal power mediator? Mediterranean Politics, 15(3), 371–392.Google Scholar
  6. Aras, B. (2009). Turkey’s rise in the greater Middle East: peace building in the periphery. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 11(1), 29–41.Google Scholar
  7. Åtland, K., & Bruusgaard, K. V. (2009). When security speech acts misfire: Russia and the Elektron incident. Security Dialogue, 40(3), 333–353.Google Scholar
  8. Bagdonas, Ö. D. (2014). Reading Turkey’s foreign policy on Syria: the AKP’s construction of a great power identity and the politics of grandeur. Turkish Studies, 15(1), 139–155.Google Scholar
  9. Balzacq, T. (2005). The three faces of securitization: political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 171–201.Google Scholar
  10. Barkey, H. J. (2014). Turkey’s Syria predicament. Survival, 56(6), 113–134.Google Scholar
  11. Benvenuto, S. (2016). Xenophobia: is it something morbid? American Imago, 73(3), 367–379.Google Scholar
  12. Bigo, D. (2000). When two become one: internal and external securitisations in Europe. In International relations theory and the politics of European integration: power, security and community (pp. 171–205). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives, 27(Special Issue), 63–92.Google Scholar
  14. Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bruinessen, M. V. (2016). Kurdish identities and Kurdish nationalisms in the early twenty-first century. In 21. Yüzyılda Milliyetçilik: Teori ve Siyaset (pp. 349–373). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
  16. Buonfino, A. (2004). Between unity and plurality: the politicization and securitization of the discourse of immigration in Europe. New Political Science, 26(1), 23–49.Google Scholar
  17. Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). EU-Europe: the European Union and its ‘near abroad. In O. W. Barry Buzan (Ed.), Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security (pp. 352–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Çakmak, C. (2016). Turkish–Syrian relations in the wake of the Syrian conflict: back to securitization. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(2), 695–717.Google Scholar
  21. Carter, E. (2005). Extreme right in Western Europe: success or failure? Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cebeci, E., & Üstün, K. (2012). The Syrian quagmire: what’s holding Turkey back? Insight Turkey, 14(2), 13.Google Scholar
  23. Chilton, P. A., & Schäffner, C. (2002). Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. Crouch, C. (2017). Neoliberalism, nationalism and the decline of political traditions. The Political Quarterly, 88(2), 221–229.Google Scholar
  25. Dunmire, P. L. (2012). Political discourse analysis: exploring the language of politics and the politics of language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 735–751. Scholar
  26. Ekmekci, F. (2011). Understanding Kurdish ethno-nationalism in Turkey: socio-economy, religion, and politics. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(9), 1608–1617. Scholar
  27. Elbakyan, E., & Davtyan, E. (2014). The Kurdish factor in Turkey-Syria relations (2012–2013).Google Scholar
  28. Ellinas, A. A. (2013). The rise of golden dawn: the new face of the far right in Greece. South European Society and Politics, 18, 543–565.Google Scholar
  29. Erdogan, M. M. (2014). Perceptions of Syrians in Turkey. Insight Turkey, 16(4), 65–75.Google Scholar
  30. Erdogan, M. M. (2015). Türkiye’deki Suriyeliler: Toplumsal Kabul ve Uyum. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
  31. Erdogan, M. M. (2017). Kopuştan Uyuma Kent Mültecileri: Suriyeli Mülteciler ve Belediyelerin Süreç Yönetimi İstanbul Örneği. Istanbul.Google Scholar
  32. Eroglu, D., Cohen, J. H., & Sirkeci, İ. (2016). Turkish migration 2016 selected papers. London: Transnational Press London.Google Scholar
  33. Ete, H., Akbaba, Y., Dalay, G., Ersay, S. O., & Eşkinat, D. (2014). 2013’te Siyaset. İstanbul: SETA.Google Scholar
  34. Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2013). Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Güçtürk, Y. (2014). The Loss of Humanity: The Human Rights Dimension of the Civil War in Syria (G. K. Handan Öz, Trans.). İstanbul: SETA.Google Scholar
  36. Gündüz, Z. Y. (2010). The European Union at 50—xenophobia, islamophobia and the rise of the radical right. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 30(1), 35–47.Google Scholar
  37. Herrera, Y. M., & Kraus, N. M. B. (2016). Pride and prejudice: ethnicity, national identity, and xenophobia in Russia. Comparative Politics, 48, 293–315.Google Scholar
  38. Hjerm, M. (1998). National identities, national pride and xenophobia: a comparison of four Western countries. Acta Sociologica, 41, 335–347.Google Scholar
  39. Howard, M. M. (2010). The impact of the far right on citizenship policy in Europe: explaining continuity and change. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 735–751.Google Scholar
  40. Huysmans, J. (1998). Revisiting Copenhagen: or, on the creative development of a security studies agenda in Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 4(4), 479–505.Google Scholar
  41. Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration., 38(5), 751–777.Google Scholar
  42. Huysmans, J. (2004). A Foucaultian view on spill-over: freedom and security in the EU. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(3), 294–318.Google Scholar
  43. Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. İçduygu, A. (2015). Syrian refugees in Turkey: the long road ahead. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  45. İçduygu, A., & Şimşek, D. (2016). Syrian refugees in Turkey: towards integration policies. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 15(3), 59–69.Google Scholar
  46. Ihlamur-Öner, S. G. (2014). Türkiye’nin Suriyeli mültecilere yönelik politikası. Ortadoğu Analiz, 6(61), 42–45.Google Scholar
  47. Jacoby, T., Mac Ginty, R., & Şenay, B. (2018). Islam, the state and Turkey’s Syrian refugees: the Vaiz of Bursa. Journal of Refugee Studies, fey025-fey025,
  48. John, R. (2002). Ethnocentrism, ethnopreference, xenophobia peace in race relations—a new understanding. The Occidental Quarterly, 7(2), 1–25.Google Scholar
  49. Jolly, S. K., & DiGiusto, G. M. (2014). Xenophobia and immigrant contact: French public attitudes toward immigration. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 464–473.Google Scholar
  50. Jones, L. (2011). Beyond securitization: explaining the scope of security policy in Southeast Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(3), 403–432. Scholar
  51. Keukeleire, S., & Raube, K. (2013). The security-development nexus and securitization in the EU’s policies towards developing countries. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26(3), 556–572. Scholar
  52. Kirişçi, K. (2016). Turkey’s role in the Syrian refugee crisis. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 17(2), 80–85.Google Scholar
  53. Koca, B. T. (2016). Syrian refugees in Turkey: from “guests” to “enemies”? New Perspectives on Turkey, 54, 55–75.Google Scholar
  54. Kosic, A., & Phalet, K. (2006). Ethnic categorization of immigrants: the role of prejudice, perceived acculturation strategies and group size. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 769–782.Google Scholar
  55. Krumpal, I. (2012). Estimating the prevalence of xenophobia and anti-semitism in Germany: a comparison of randomized response and direct questioning. Social Science Research, 41, 1387–1403.Google Scholar
  56. Lazarev, E., & Sharma, K. (2017). Brother or burden: an experiment on reducing prejudice toward Syrian refugees in Turkey. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(2), 201–219. Scholar
  57. Leonard, S. (2010). EU border security and migration into the European Union: FRONTEX and securitisation through practices. European Security, 19(2), 231–254.Google Scholar
  58. Lijphart, A., Özbudun, E., & Onulduran, E. (1984). Çağdaş demokrasiler: yirmibir ülkede çoğunlukçu ve oydaşmacı yönetim örüntüleri: Yetkin.Google Scholar
  59. Memisoglu, F., & Ilgit, A. (2017). Syrian refugees in Turkey: multifaceted challenges, diverse players and ambiguous policies. Mediterranean Politics, 22(3), 317–338. Scholar
  60. Mudde, C. (2000). The ideology of the extreme right. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Murinson, A. (2006). The strategic depth doctrine of Turkish foreign policy. Middle Eastern Studies, 42(6), 945–964.Google Scholar
  63. Nielsen, S. Y. (2016). Perceptions between Syrian refugees and their host community. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 15(3), 99–106.Google Scholar
  64. Ocakli, F. (2017). Politics in the Kurdish periphery: clan networks and local party strategies in a comparative perspective. Middle Eastern Studies, 53(4), 571–584.Google Scholar
  65. Oktav, Ö. Z., & Çelikaksoy, A. (2015). The Syrian refugee challenge and Turkey’s quest for normative power in the Middle East. Scholarly Essay, 70(3), 408–420.Google Scholar
  66. Öniş, Z. (2014). Turkey and the Arab revolutions: boundaries of regional power influence in a turbulent Middle East. Mediterranean Politics, 19(2), 203–219. Scholar
  67. Öniş, Z., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2016). Turkey and Russia in a shifting global order: cooperation, conflict and asymmetric interdependence in a turbulent region. Third World Quarterly, 37(1), 71–95.Google Scholar
  68. Oudenhoven, J. P. V., Ward, C., & Masgoret, A.-M. (2006). Patterns of relations between immigrants and host societies. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 637–651.Google Scholar
  69. Özbudun, E. (2006). From political Islam to conservative democracy: the case of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey. South European Society & Politics, 11(3–4), 543–557.Google Scholar
  70. Özbudun, E. (2011). Türkiye’de parti ve seçim sistemi: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
  71. Özden, Ş. (2013). Syrian refugees in Turkey. MPC Research Reports (Vol. 2013). San Domenico di Fiesole: Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  72. Rotte, R., & Steininger, M. (2000). Sozioökonomische Determinanten extremistischer Wahlerfolge in Deutschland: Das Beispiel der Europawahlen 1994 und 1999. IZA, 1–57.Google Scholar
  73. Rygiel, K., Baban, F., & Ilcan, S. (2016). The Syrian refugee crisis: the EU-Turkey “deal” and temporary protection. Global Social Policy, 16(3), 315–320.Google Scholar
  74. Steininger, M., & Rotte, R. (2009). Crime, unemployment, and xenophobia? An ecological analysis of right-wing election results in Hamburg, 1986–2005. Jahrbuch fur Regionalwissenschaf, 29, 29–63.Google Scholar
  75. Talhamy, Y. (2010). The Fatwas and the Nusayri/Alawis of Syria. Middle Eastern Studies, 46(2), 175–194. Scholar
  76. Taras, R. (2012). Xenophobia and Islamophobia in Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Political discourse and racism: describing others in Western parliaments. In S. H. Riggins (Ed.), The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse (Communication and Human Values) (pp. 31–64). California: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  78. Van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Political discourse and ideology. In M. R. Clara Ubaldina Lorda (Ed.), Anàlisi del discurs polític (pp. 15–34). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
  79. Vuori, J. A. (2008). Illocutionary logic and strands of securitization: applying the theory of securitization to the study of non-democratic political orders. European Journal of International Relations, 14, 65–99.Google Scholar
  80. Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In On security (pp. 46–87). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Williams, M. H. (2010). Can leopards change their spots? Between xenophobia and trans-ethnic populism among west European far right parties. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 16(1), 111–134.Google Scholar
  82. Yılmaz, F. (2012). Right-wing hegemony and immigration: how the populist far-right achieved hegemony through the immigration debate in Europe. Current Sociology, 60(3), 368–381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Public Administration, School of Economics and Administrative SciencesErzincan Binali Yildirim UniversityErzincanTurkey

Personalised recommendations