Advertisement

Becoming ‘the Internationals’—how Place Shapes the Sense of Belonging and Group Formation of High-Skilled Migrants

  • Jörg Plöger
  • Susanne Kubiak
Article

Abstract

Within the context of the transformation of work, mobility turns into a characteristic of contemporary (work-)lives and a pre-requisite for career biographies. High-skilled migrants who are employed in academia, IT or engineering increasingly incorporate the mobility demands of their ‘mobilised professions’. This paper examines how mobile professionals relate to their current place of residence, what kind of frictions they face and what forms of (alternative) belonging they develop in response. In doing so, the paper links ideas from governmentality studies with recent work from migration studies and the spatial sciences. Our analysis draws on interviews with high-skilled migrants in Manchester (UK). While broadly accepting the mobility demands of their respective fields of work without questioning, their resulting mobile practices often undermine the development of a sense of belonging based on place attachment and local social interaction. Our empirical material suggests that this potential conflict is mediated through the constitution of a group of ‘internationals’ who share mobile biographies and the experience of in-betweenness. Based on our findings, we suggest three directions for future research: to focus on the relational aspects of place ties, to investigate the role of the workplace and more specifically the employer, and to explore how places shape differential politics of belonging.

Keywords

High-skilled migrants Labour mobility Belonging Social integration Entrepreneurial self Cosmopolitanism 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (1999). Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(3), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Bauder, H. (2012). The international mobility of academics: A labour market perspective. International Migration, 53(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (2011). Cosmopolitanism as imagined Communities of global Risk. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1346–1361.Google Scholar
  5. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Brickell, K., & Datta, A. (Eds.). (2011). Translocal geographies—spaces, places, connections. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Bröckling, U. (2016). The entrepreneurial self. Fabricating a new type of subject. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cantwell, B. (2011). Transnational mobility and international academic employment: Gatekeeping in an academic competition arena. Minerva, 49(4), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandler, D., & Reid, J. (2016). The neoliberal subject—resilience, adaptation and vulnerability. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  10. Colic-Peisker, V. (2010). Free floating in the cosmopolis? Exploring the identity-belonging of transnational knowledge workers. Global Networks, 10(4), 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, F. L. (2012). Transnational mobilities an urban spatialities: Notes from the Asia-Pacific. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 316–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahinden, J. (2013). Cities, migrant incorporation, and ethnicity: A network perspective on boundary work. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 14(1), 39–60.Google Scholar
  13. Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Dowling, R. (2008). Geographies of identity: Labouring in the ‘neoliberal’ university. Progress in Human Geography, 32(6), 812–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2011). Locating migration: Rescaling cities and migrants. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, E., & De Souza e Silva, A. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ho, E. L. (2011). Migration trajectories of ‘highly skilled’ middling transnationals: Singaporean Transmigrants in London. Population, Space and Place, 17(1), 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iredale, R. (2001). The migration of professionals: Theories and typologies. International Migration, 39(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jöns, H. (2009). ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: Studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954-2000. Global Networks, 9(3), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennedy, P. (2007). Global transformations and local ‘bubble’ lives: Taking a reality check on some globalization concepts. Globalizations, 4(2), 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kesselring, S. (2014). Corporate mobility regimes. Mobility, power and the socio-geographical structurations of mobile work. Mobilities, 10(4), 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kesselring, S., & Vogl, G. (2010). Betriebliche Mobilitätsregime. Die sozialen Kosten mobiler Arbeit. Berlin: Edition sigma.Google Scholar
  23. Khoo, S. E., Voigt-Graf, C., McDonald, P., & Hugo, G. (2007). Temporary skilled migration to Australia: Employers’ perspectives. International Migration, 45(4), 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knott, E. (2017). Nationalism and belonging: Introduction. Nations and Nationalism, 23(2), 220–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koser, K., & Salt, J. (1997). The geography of highly skilled international migration. International Journal of Population Geography, 3(4), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  27. Larner, W., & Walters, W. (2004). Globalization as governmentality. Alternatives, 29(5), 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lemke, T. (2000). Neoliberalismus, Staat und Selbsttechnologien. Ein kritischer Überblick über die governmentality studies. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 41(1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ley, D. (2004). Transnational spaces and everyday lives. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lusis, T., & Bauder, H. (2011). Migration and labour markets: An interpretation of the literature. In K. Townsend & A. Wilkinson (Eds.), Research handbook on the future of work and employment relations (pp. 212–229). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Mahroum, S. (2000). Highly skilled globetrotters: Mapping the international migration of human capital. R&D Management, 30(1), 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mee, K., & Wright, S. (2009). Geographies of belonging—guest editorial. Environment and Planning A, 41(4), 772–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meier, L. (Ed.). (2015). Migrant professionals in the city. Local encounters, identities and inequalities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Millar, J., & Salt, J. (2006). In whose interests? IT migration in an interconnected world economy. Population, Space and Place, 13(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Musterd, S., & Gritsai, O. (2013). The creative knowledge city in Europe: Structural conditions and urban policy strategies for competitive cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(3), 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nowicka, M. (2007). Mobile locations: Construction of home in a group of mobile transnational professionals. Global Networks, 7(1), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ong, A., & Nonini, D. (Eds.). (1997). Ungrounded empires: The cultural politics of modern Chinese transnationalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Peck, J., & Ward, K. (2002). Placing Manchester. In J. Peck & K. Ward (Eds.), City of revolution: Re-structuring Manchester (pp. 1–17). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Raghuram, P. (2014). Brain circulation or precarious labour? Conceptualizing temporariness in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service. In L. F. Vosko, V. Preston, & R. Latham (Eds.), Liberating temporariness? Migration, work, and citizenship in an age of insecurity (pp. 177–200). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, S. (2013). Migration and the employer perspective: Pitfalls and potentials for a future research agenda. Population, Space and Place, 19, 703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tomaney, J. (2014). Region and place 2: Belonging. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  45. Van Bochove, M., & Engbersen, G. (2015). Beyond cosmopolitanism and expat bubbles: Challenging dominant representations of knowledge workers and trailing spouses. Population, Space and Place, 21, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Riemsdijk, M. (2014). International migration and local emplacement: Everyday place-making practices of skilled migrants in Oslo, Norway. Environment and Planning A, 46(4), 963–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vincent-Geslin, S., & Ravalet, E. (2015). Socialisation to high mobility? In G. Viry & V. Kaufmann (Eds.), High mobility in Europe. Work and personal life (pp. 59–82). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, A. M., & Baláž, V. (2008). International migration and knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, S., Bradley, H., Devadason, R., & Erickson, M. (2013). Globalization and work. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  51. Yeoh, B. S. A. (2005). Observations on transnational urbanism: Possibilities, politics and costs of simultaneity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yeoh, B. S. A., & Willis, K. (2005). Singaporean and British transmigrants in China and the cultural politics of ‘contact zones’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Young, C., Diep, M., & Drabble, S. (2006). Living with difference? The ‘Cosmopolitan City’ and urban reimaging in Manchester, UK. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1687–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ILS – Research Institute for Regional and Urban DevelopmentDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations