Stepping up Your Game: Workplace Experiences of Second-Generation Nigerians in the USA

  • Onoso ImoageneEmail author


This article discusses the workplace experiences of second-generation Nigerian adults in the USA. Drawing on data from semi-structured interviews with 67 respondents, I show that second-generation Nigerians differ in whether they perceive racial discrimination in the workplace. There was an almost even split between subjects who felt they had been discriminated against because of their race and those who said they had not experienced anti-black discrimination. For those who felt they had been racially discriminated against at work, their experiences took very similar forms to those of African Americans, with many drawing analogies between their workplace experiences and those of African Americans and other blacks. But there was evidence of intra-black dynamics with some experiencing ethnic discrimination from African Americans and some enjoying an advantage over African Americans because they are children of black immigrants. I showcase two strategic responses found among respondents: minimizing ethnic difference and stepping up one’s game, which were used to negotiate racism and achieve economic mobility. This is consistent with the minority cultures of mobility thesis; that minority groups have cultures of mobility that foster upward social mobility, and it challenges segmented assimilation theory’s perception that black immigrant groups and their children lack tenacity or adaptive strategies.


Black Nigerian Second-generation Workplace discrimination Strategies 


  1. Alba, R. (2009). Blurring the color line: the new chance for a more integrated America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin, L. (2005). The black elite. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, S. M. (1997). Black corporate executives: the making and breaking of a black middle class. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Durr, M., & Wingfield, A. H. (2011). Keep your “N” in check: African American women and the interactive effects of etiquette and emotional labor. Critical Sociology, 37(5), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Essed, P. (1991). Understanding everyday racism: an interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Farley, R., & Alba, R. (2002). The new second generation in the United States. International Migration Review, 36(3), 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feagin, J. R., & Sikes, M. P. (1994). Living with racism: the black middle-class experience. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fleming, C. M., Lamont, M., & Welburn, J. S. (2012). African Americans respond to stigmatization: the meanings and salience of confronting, deflecting conflict, educating the ignorant and “managing the self”. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(3), 400–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greer, C. M. (2013). Black ethnics: race, immigration, and the pursuit of the American dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haller, W., Portes, A., & Lynch, S. M. (2011). Dreams fulfilled, dreams shattered: determinants of segmented assimilation in the second generation. Social Forces, 89(3), 733–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Imoagene, O. (2017). Beyond expectations: second generation Nigerians in the United States and Britain. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackman, M. (1994). The Velvet Glove. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kasinitz, P., Mollenkopf, J. H., Waters, M. C., & Holdaway, J. (2008). Inheriting the city: the children of immigrants come of age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Massey, D. (2008). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Myers, D. (2007). Immigrants and boomers: forging a new social contract for the future of America. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Neckerman, K. M., Carter, P., & Lee, J. (1999). Segmented assimilation and minority cultures of mobility. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 945–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2015). Racial formation in the United States (Third ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Park, J., & Myers, D. (2010). Intergenerational mobility in the post-1965 immigration era: estimates by an immigrant generation cohort method. Demography, 47(2), 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (1996). Immigrant America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies: the story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Putnam, R. D. (2015). Our kids: the American dream in crisis. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  24. Rogers, R. (2006). Afro-Caribbean immigrants and the politics of incorporation: ethnicity, exception, or exit. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Showers, F. (2015). Being black, foreign and woman: African immigrant identities in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(10), 1815–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. United States Census Bureau/American FactFinder. (2016). 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimate, Tables S1501, S15002B, S0201. U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office, 2015. Web. 12 April 2016.Google Scholar
  27. Waters, M. C. (1999). Black identities: West Indian immigrant dreams and American realities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Zephir, F. (2001). Trends in ethnic identification among second-generation Haitian immigrants in new York City. Westport: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations