Social Rights and Migrant Realities: Migration Policy Reform and Migrants’ Access to Health Care in Costa Rica, Argentina, and Chile

Article

Abstract

Immigration poses a significant challenge to states’ existing social protection systems, especially in developing countries that are already struggling to provide social services for their citizens. In particular, immigration produces a tension between citizenship rights—those extended only to citizens, and social rights—rights extended by the state to others within their national territory. Immigration raises questions not only about the rights and access of migrants to health and other social services but also the level and quality of provisions to citizens. We draw on literatures on welfare regimes in Latin America, welfare magnets, and the legitimacy of social rights to examine the nexus of migration and health care policy in Costa Rica, Argentina, and Chile—three countries that have recently pursued immigration reform. We argue that variation in the extension of immigrants’ social rights to health is explained by the interaction of existing migration and social policies, the nature of the health care system in each country, and, in some cases, international and regional norms.

Keywords

Social rights Citizenship rights Access to health Costa Rica Argentina Chile 

References

  1. Asa, P., & Ceriani, C. P. (2005). Los acuerdos del Mercosur y la nueva ley de migraciones en Argentina. Beyond Law, 28, 39–65.Google Scholar
  2. Baganha, M. (2000) Immigrants’ social citizenship and labour market dynamics in Portugal. In: M. Bommes & A. Geddes (Eds), Immigration and Welfare. Challenging the borders of the welfare state. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin-Edwards, M. (2002) Immigration and the welfare state: a European challenge to American mythology. UEHR Working Papers, MMO series, 4. Athens: University Research Institute of Urban Environment and Human Resources.Google Scholar
  4. Banting, K. (2000) Looking in three directions: migration and the European welfare state in comparative perspective. In M. Bommes & A. Geddes (Eds.), Immigration and welfare. Challenging the borders of the welfare state. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Barba, C. (2007) Combatir la pobreza o construir ciudadanía para todos? América Latina. Regímenes de bienestar en transición al iniciar el siglo XXI. Guadalajara: Universidad de GuadalajaraGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrientos, A. (2004). Latin America: towards a liberal-informal welfare regime? In I. Gough & G. Wood (Eds.), Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barrientos, A., & Lloyd-Sherlock, P. (2000). Reforming health insurance in Argentina and Chile. Health Policy and Planning, 15(4), 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Begala, S. (2012). El reconocimiento diferenciado de derechos: primer obstáculo al acceso a la justicia de las personas migrantes. Revista Derecho y Ciencias Sociales, 6, 3–24.Google Scholar
  9. Belló, M., & Becerril-Montekio, V. M. (2011). Sistema de salud de Argentina. Salud Pública de México, 53(2), S96–S108.Google Scholar
  10. Belmartino, S. (2000). The context and process of healthcare reform in Argentina. In S. Fleury, S. Belmartino, & E. Baris (Eds.), Reshaping health care in Latin America: a comparative analysis of health care reform in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico (pp. 75–101). Ottowa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  11. Boeri, T., G. Hanson, B. McCormick, et al. (Eds.) (2002) Immigration policy and the welfare system. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolaños, F. (2009). Dictamen jurídico y socio laboral. Convenio Bi-nacional Costa Rica-Nicaragua. San José: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  13. Bonilla-Carrión, R. (2008) Seguro social y usos de servicios de salud entre personas nicaragüenses en Costa Rica. In Sandoval, C. (Ed.), El mito roto. Inmigración y emigración en Costa Rica. San José, Editorial UCRGoogle Scholar
  14. Borge, D. (2004) Migraciones de Nicaragüenses hacia Costa Rica: análisis de dos redes sociales. Doctoral Thesis, Governance and Public Policy. San Pedro: Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  15. Borjas, G. (1994) Immigration and welfare 1970–1990. Working Paper 6813. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  16. Borjas, G. (1998) Immigration and Welfare Magnets. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(4), 607–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cabieses, B., Tunstall, H., Pickett, K. E., Gideon, J., et al. (2012a). Understanding differences in access and use of healthcare between international immigrants to Chile and the Chilean-born: a repeated cross-sectional population-based study in Chile. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11, 68. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cabieses, B., Pickett, K. E., Tunstall, H., et al. (2012b). What are the living conditions and health status of those who don’t report their migration status? A population based study of Chile. BioMed Central Public Health, 12, 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caggiano, S. (2008). Racismo, fundamentalismo cultural y restricción de la ciudadanía: Formas de regulación social frente a inmigrantes en Argentina. In S. Novick (Ed.), Las Migraciones en América Latina (pp. 31–51). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
  20. Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social (CCSS) (2012) Afiliación y prestación de servicios de salud a los asegurados extranjeros no habilitados legalmente para trabajar en el país. Internal communication 10/04/2012. San José: CCSS.Google Scholar
  21. Cano, V., M. Soffia, J. Martínez, et al. (2009) Conocer para legislar y hacer política: los desafíos de Chile ante un uevo escenario migratorio. Serie de población y Desarrollo, 88. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL/CELADE.Google Scholar
  22. Carrasco, L.A. (2008) Living on the Margins: illness and healthcare among Peruvian migrants in Chile. Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden University.Google Scholar
  23. Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS) (2013) Migrantes. Buenos Aires: CELS.Google Scholar
  24. CEPALSTAT (2009) “Statistics and indicators.” CEPALSTAT. http://estadisticas.cepal.org/cepalstat/WEB_CEPALSTAT/estadisticasIndicadores.asp?idioma=i. Accessed 20 January 2014.
  25. Ceriani Cernadas, P. (2011). Luces y sombras en la legislación migratoria latinoamericana. Nueva Sociedad, 233, 68–86.Google Scholar
  26. Cerrutti, M. (2011) Salud y migración internacional: mujeres bolivianas en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Programa Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo - PNUD; Centro de Estudios de Población - CENEP; UNFPA Argentina.Google Scholar
  27. Clark, M.A. (2002) Health sector reform in Costa Rica: reinforcing a public system.” Paper Presented at the Woodrow Wilson Center Workshops on the Politics of Education and Health Reforms, April 18-19.Google Scholar
  28. Courtis, C. & Pacecca, M.I. (2007) Migración y derechos humanos: una aproximación crítica al “nuevo paradigma” para el tratamiento de la cuestión migratoria en la Argentina. Revista Jurídica de Buenos Aires. Special issue on Human Rights, 183-200.Google Scholar
  29. Courtis, C., G. Liguori, M. Cerrutti, et al. (2010) Migración y Salud en Zonas Fronterizas: el Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia y la Argentina. Serie Población y Desarrollo. Centro Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Demografía (CELADE) – División de Población de la CEPAL. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
  30. De Jong, G. & Graefe, D. (2002) Welfare reform and migration: moving to benefits; moving from restrictions. Population Research Institute. Report prepared for Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research. The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  31. Demoscopica (2008) Diagnóstico y Factibilidad Global Para la Implementación De Políticas Locales de Salud Para Inmigrantes En La Zona Norte de la Región Metropolitana. http://www.minsal.gob.cl/portal/url/item/71841d2e91f518a1e04001011f015cc6.pdf. Accessed 8 October 2013.
  32. Domenech, E. (2007). La agenda política sobre migraciones en América del sur: el caso de la Argentina. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, 23(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Domenech, E. (2008). La ciudadanización de la política migratoria en la región sudamericana: vicisitudes de la agenda global”. In S. Novick (Ed.), Las migraciones en América Latina. Catálogos: Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  34. Domenech, E. (2011) Crónica de una ‘amenaza’ anunciada. Inmigración e ‘ilegalidad’: visiones de Estado en la Argentina contemporánea. In B. Feldman Bianco, L. Rivera Sánchez, C. Stefoni, M.I. Villa Martínez (Eds.), La construcción social del sujeto migrante en América Latina. Prácticas, representaciones y categorías (pp. 31-78). Quito: CLACSO-Flacso-U. Alberto Hurtado.Google Scholar
  35. Doña-Reveco, C. & Levinson, A. (2012) Chile: a growing destination country in search of a coherent approach to migration. http://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/display.cfm?ID=895. Accessed 8 October 2013.
  36. Douchez-Lortet, C. (2013) UN: Chile is South America’s most appealing country for immigrants. The Santiago Times September 16, 2013. http://www.santiagotimes.cl/world/chile-abroad/26730-un-chile-is-south-americas-most-appealing-country-for-immigrants. Accessed 8 October 2013.
  37. Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1203–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ECLAC. (2011). Panorama Social de América Latina 2011. Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
  39. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Faist, T. (1994). Immigration, integration and the ethnicization of politics. European Journal of Political Research, 25, 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Favell, A. (2006) The nation-centered perspective. In M. Giugni & F. Passy (Eds.), Dialogues on Migration Policy (pp. 45–56). Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  42. Filgueira, F. (1998). El nuevo modelo de prestaciones sociales en América Latina: residualismo y ciudadanía estratificada. In B. Roberts (Ed.), Cuidadanía y política social. San José: FLACSO/SSRC.Google Scholar
  43. Filgueira, F. (2004) The structural y political keys of the reluctant Latin American social state and its interplay with democracy: the development, crisis y aftermath of universal, dual y exclusionary social states. Working paper. Brasil: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  44. Fischer, A. (2009) Towards genuine universalism within contemporary development policy. Research Paper prepared for: High Level Policy Forum—After 2015: Promoting Pro-poor Policy after the MDGs, 23 June, Belgium, Brussels.Google Scholar
  45. Fouratt, C. (2014). “Those who come to do harm”: the framings of immigration problems in Costa Rican immigration law. International Migration Review, 48(1), 144–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Freeman, G. (1986). Migration and the political economy of the welfare state. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 485, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Garcia, L. (2010). “Migración y derechos humanos: Implicancias de la nueva política migratoria argentina.” Tesis de Maestria, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
  48. Garcia, L. (2014). “Policy and institutional frameworks—country report Argentina.” INTERACT RR 2014/23, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI): European University Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Giustiniani, R. (Ed.) (2004) Migración: un derecho humano. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
  50. Gough, I. & Wood, G. (Eds.) (2004) Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Guiraudon, V., & Lahav, G. (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate. The case of migration control. Comparative Political Studies, 33(2), 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hjerm, M. (2005). Integration into the social democratic welfare state. Social Indicators Research, 70(2), 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hollifield, J. (2000) Immigration and the politics of rights. The French case in comparative perspective. In: M. Bommes & Geddes, A. (Eds.), Immigration and welfare. Challenging the borders of the welfare state. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Huber, E. & Stephens, J. D. (2012) Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hujo, K. & Piper, N. (eds) (2010) South-South migration. Implications for social policy and development. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales (IIS); Centro de Investigación en Cultura y Desarrollo; Programa radiofónico Casa Abierta 870 UCR; Servicio Jesuita para Migrantes Costa Rica (2012) Conferencia de Prensa. La Ley de Migración en Costa Rica: A dos años de su entrada en vigencia. Promesas, realidades y desafíos. http://www.lanuevaprensacr.com/la-ley-de-migracion-en-costa-rica-a-dos-anos-de-su-entrada-en-vigencia-promesas-realidades-y-des. Accessed 16 April 2013.
  57. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos de Argentina (INDEC). (2010) Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas 2010. Buenos Aires: INDECGoogle Scholar
  58. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos de Costa Rica (INEC). (2011). X Censo Nacional de Población, Costa Rica 2011. San José: INEC.Google Scholar
  59. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas de Chile (INE) (2012) XVIII Censo Nacional de Población y VII de Vivienda o Censo de Población y Vivienda 2012. Santiago de Chile: INE.Google Scholar
  60. Jacobson, D. (1996). Rights across borders. Immigration and the decline of citizenship. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Jelin, E. (2006) Salud y Migración Regional. Ciudadanía, Discriminación y Comunicación Intercultural. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Desarrollo Económico y Social (IDES).Google Scholar
  62. Jiménez Matarrita, A. (2009). La vida en otra parte. Migraciones y cambios culturales en Costa Rica. San José: Editorial Arlekín.Google Scholar
  63. Joppke, C. (1999). Immigration and the Nation-State: the United States, Germany, and Great Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kron, S. (2011). Gestión migratoria en Norte y Centroamérica: Manifestaciones y contestaciones. Anuario de Estudios Centroamericanos, 37, 53–85.Google Scholar
  65. López Ruiz, M. (2012) The incorporation of Nicaraguan temporary migrants into Costa Rica’s healthcare system: an opportunity for social equity. Doctoral Thesis, Faculty of Graduate Studies through Sociology, Anthropology and Criminology, Windsor: University of Windsor.Google Scholar
  66. Lucas Garín, Andrea (2010) Derechos humanos en clave de Mercosur. Revista Brasileira de Direito Constitucional, RBDC no. 15: 27-37Google Scholar
  67. Lucas Garín, Andrea (2010) Human rights and regional integration in MERCOSUR: a bipolar relationship.Google Scholar
  68. Martínez Franzoni, J. (2008) Domesticar la incertidumbre en América Latina. Mercado laboral, política social y familias. San José: Editorial UCR.Google Scholar
  69. Martínez Franzoni, J., Mora, S., Voorend, K., et al. (2009). El trabajo doméstico remunerado en Costa Rica: entre ocupación y pilar de los cuidados. San José: PNUD/INAMU.Google Scholar
  70. Mesa-Lago, C. (1994) La reforma de la seguridad social y las pensiones en América Latina. CEPAL Serie reformas de política pública, 28. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
  71. MIDEPLAN. (2007). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2006-2010. San José: MIDEPLAN.Google Scholar
  72. Mkandawire, T. (2005). Targeting and Universalism in Poverty Reduction. United Nationals Research Institute for Social Development, Social Policy and Development Programme Paper Number 23.Google Scholar
  73. Morales, A. (2008) Inmigración en Costa Rica: características sociales y laborales, integración y políticas públicas. Serie Población y Desarrollo, 85. Santiago: CEPAL.Google Scholar
  74. Morissens, A. (2008) Migration, welfare states and the incorporation of migrants in different welfare regimes. UNRISD Flagship Report on Poverty. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  75. Novick, S. (2008) Migración y políticas en Argentina: Tres leyes para un país extenso (1876-2004). Cuadernos del Pensamiento Crítico. Mexico DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  76. Novick, S. (2010) Políticas migratorias en la Argentina: experiencias del pasado, reformas actuales y expectativas futuras. In: C. Zurbriggen & Mondol, L. (coord.) Estado actual y perspectivas de las políticas migratorias en el MERCOSUR. Montevideo: FLACSO Uruguay.Google Scholar
  77. Novick, S. (2012). Transformations and challenges of Argentinean migratory policy in relation to the international context. Migracuones Internacionales, 6(3), 205–237.Google Scholar
  78. Noy, S. (2011). New contexts, different patterns? A comparative analysis of social spending and government health expenditure in Latin America and the OECD. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52(3), 215–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Noy, S. (2013a) Globalization, international financial institutions and health policy reform in Latin America. Doctoral Thesis, Sociology, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  80. Noy, S. (2013b). Las Politicas de Salud del Banco Mundial. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 142(5), 75–85.Google Scholar
  81. Nwogu, N. (2007). Regional integration as an instrument of human rights: reconceptualizing ECOWAS. Journal of Human Rights, 6(3), 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. OECD (2009) Latin American Economic Outlook 2010: Chile. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dev/americas/44535556.pdf. Accesed 8 October 2013.
  83. Oteiza, E. & Novick, S. (2000) Inmigración y derechos humanos. Política y discurso en el tramo final del menemismo. Documentos de Trabajo del IIGG, 14.Google Scholar
  84. Pacecca, M. I., & Corina C. (2008) Inmigración contemporánea en Argentina: dinámicas y políticas. Población y Desarrollo Nº 84. http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/9/34569/lcl2928-P.pdf.
  85. Robinson, W. (2009). Saskia Sassen and the Sociology of Globalization. Sociological Analysis, 3(1), 5–29.Google Scholar
  86. Rodríguez, S. & Labrín S. (2013) Ley de inmigrantes facilita llegada de extranjeros y convalidación de títulos profesionales. http://diario.latercera.com/2013/06/05/01/contenido/pais/31-138424-9-ley-de-inmigrantes-facilita-llegada-de-extranjeros-y-convalidacion-de-titulos.html. Accessed 9 December 2013.
  87. Rosenhek, Z. (2000). Migration regimes, intra-state conflicts, and the politics of exclusion and inclusion: migrant workers in the Israeli welfare state. Social Problems, 47(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sáenz, M. R., Acosta, M., Muiser, J., Bermúdez, J. L., et al. (2011). Sistema de salud de Costa Rica. Salud Pública de México, 53(2), S157.Google Scholar
  89. Sainsbury, D. (2006). Immigrants social rights in comparative perspective: welfare regimes, forms in immigration and immigration policy regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sandoval, Carlos (ed) (2008) El mito roto. Inmigración y emigración en Costa Rica. San José: Editorial UCR.Google Scholar
  91. Sandoval, C. (2012) Contestar la hostilidad antiinmigrante en Costa Rica. Un proyecto de Ciencias Sociales públicas en curso. In: M. Llona (ed.) Entreverse. Teoría y metodología práctica de las fuentes orales. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
  92. Sassen, S. (1996). Losing Control? Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Schram, S., & Soss, J. (1999). The real value of welfare: why poor families do not migrate. Politics and Society, 27, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sharma, A. (2006). Introduction: Rethinking Theories of the State&newnbsp;in an Age of Gobalization. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.) Anthropology of the State: A Reader& (pp. 1–41). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  95. Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship. Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  96. Stefoni, C. (2008) Inmigrantes en Chile. Una integración diferenciada al mercado laboral. In SOPLA, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, Migración y políticas sociales en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.Google Scholar
  97. Stefoni, C. (2011) Ley y política migratoria en Chile. La ambivalencia en la comprensión del migrante. In B. Feldman Bianco, L. Rivera Sánchez, C. Stefoni, M.I. Villa Martínez (eds) La construcción social del sujeto migrante en América Latina. Prácticas, representaciones y categorías (pp. 79-110). Quito: CLACSO-Flacso-U. Alberto Hurtado.Google Scholar
  98. Torres, A. (2012) Universal health care in Argentina: fact or fiction? An analysis of Bolivian immigrant women’s access to health care in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Bachelor Thesis, Sociology, Wesleyan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  99. Unger, J. P., De Paepe, P., Buitrón, R., Soors, W., et al. (2008a). Costa Rica: achievements of a heterodox health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 98(4), 636–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Unger, J. P., de Paepe, P., Solimano Cantuarias, G., Arteaga Herrera, O., et al. (2008b). Chile’s neoliberal health reform: an assessment and a critique. PLoS Medicine, 5(4), 542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. United Nations (2012) Migrants by origin and destination: the role of South-South migration. Population Facts, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/popfacts/popfacts_2012-3_South-South_migration.pdf. Accessed 3 December 2014.
  102. Van Hooren, F. J. (2011) Caring migrants in European welfare regimes: the policies and practice of migrant labor filling the gaps in social care. Doctoral Thesis, Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute.Google Scholar
  103. Van Oorschot, W. (2008). Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Varela, G. (2005) La Legislación argentina migratoria. In Cecym, Fundación Instituto de la Mujer, Migraciones, Globalización y género en Argentina y Chile. Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Programa Mujeres y Movimientos Sociales.Google Scholar
  105. Voorend, K. (2013) “Shifting in” migration control. Universalism and immigration in Costa Rica. In ISS Working Paper Series/General Series (Vol. 564, pp. 1–31). Erasmus University Rotterdam. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/41448. Accessed 13 August 2014.
  106. Voorend, K. (2014). “Shifting in” state sovereignty: social policy and migration control in Costa Rica. Transnational Social Review, 4(2–3), 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigaciones SocialesUniversity of Costa RicaSan PedroCosta Rica

Personalised recommendations