Discrimination of the Second Generation: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Norway
A major question in labour market research is the extent to which discrimination in employments causes the disadvantages experienced by children of immigrants. This article contributes to the debate by utilising a correspondence test study in which pairs of equivalent résumés and cover letters—one with a Pakistani name and one with a Norwegian name—were sent in response to 900 job openings in the greater Oslo area. The results show that applicants with Norwegian names on average are 25 % more likely to receive a call back for a job interview than equally qualified applicants with Pakistani names. More refined analyses demonstrate that the effect of ethnic background on employment probabilities is larger among men than women and larger in the private sector than in the public sector, and important variations among the occupations included in the study are revealed. In an effort to separate the potentially conflating effects of gender and sector, all applications to gender-segregated occupations were removed from the analyses. Interestingly, the gender differences disappear when exclusively analysing discrimination in gender-integrated occupations by sector. In gender-integrated occupations in the private sector, the gender difference in fact is reversed, indicating that women with minority background are treated less favourably than are minority men in the private sector. These results suggest that the intersection of gender, ethnicity, and sector should be scrutinised more carefully in future field experiments.
KeywordsDiscrimination Ethnicity Field experiment Employment Second generation
- Adida, C. L., Laitin, D., & Valfort, M.-A. (2012). ‘One Muslim is Enough!’ Evidence from a Field Experiment in France. Available at SSRN: http://search.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1957351, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1957351.
- Alba, R., & Waters, M. C. (2011a). Dimensions of second-generation incorporation. In R. Alba & M. C. Waters (Eds.), The next generation: immigrant youth in a comparative perspective (pp. 1–28). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Alba, R., & Waters, M. C. (Eds.). (2011b). The next generation: immigrant youth in a comparative perspective. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Banton, M. (1997). The ethics of practice-testing. New Community, 23(3), 413–420.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. (1957). The economics of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bielby, W. T. (2010). Accentuate the positive: are good intentions an effective way to minimize systemic workplace bias? Virginia Law Review In Brief, 95, 117–126.Google Scholar
- Blank, R. M., Dabady, M., & Citro, C. F. (Eds.). (2004). Measuring racial discrimination. panel on methods for assessing discrimination. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Brief, A. (Ed.). (2008). Diversity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Brochmann, G., & Kjeldstadli, K. (2008). A history of immigration. The case of Norway 900–2000. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
- Bursell, M. (2014). The Multiple Burdens of Foreign-Named Men—Evidence from a Field Experiment on Gendered Ethnic Hiring Discrimination in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 30(3), 399–409. doi:10.1093/esr/jcu047.
- Craig, R. (2007). Systemic discrimination in employment and the promotion of ethnic equality. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
- Crul, M., Schneider, J., & Lelie, F. (2012). The European second generation compared: does the integration context matter? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
- EGGE. (2009). Gender segregation in the labour market: root causes, implications and policy responses in the EU. Report from the European Commission’s Expert Group on Gender and Employment (EGGE). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Evensen, Ø. (2009). Høyt utdannete innvandreretterkommeres møte med arbeidsmarkedet. In G. E. Birkelund & A. Mastekaasa (Eds.), Integrert? Innvandrere og barn av innvandrere i utdanning og arbeidsliv (pp. 179–197). Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.Google Scholar
- Graubard, S. R. (Ed.). (1986). Norden—the passion for equality. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
- Heckman, J., & Siegelman, P. (1993). The urban institute audit studies: their methods and findings. In M. Fix & R. J. Struyk (Eds.), Clear and convincing evidence: measurement of discrimination in America. Washington: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Midtbøen, A. H. (2014). The invisible second generation? Statistical discrimination and immigrant stereotypes in employment processes in Norway. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(10), 1675–1675. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.847784.
- OECD. (2010). Equal opportunities? The labour market integration of the children of immigrants. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- OECD (2013). Discrimination against immigrants—measurement, incidence and policy instruments. In International migration outlook 2013. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Oreopoulos, P. (2011). Why do skilled immigrants struggle in the labor market? A field experiment with thirteen thousand resumes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(4), 148–171.Google Scholar
- Reisel, L., Lessard-Philips, L., & Kasinitz, P. (2012). Entering the labor market. In M. Crul & J. H. Mollenkopf (Eds.), The changing face of world cities: young adult children of immigrants in Europe and the United States (pp. 97–128). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Reskin, B. F. (2008). Rethinking employment discrimination and its remedies. In D. B. Grusky (Ed.), Social stratification: class, race and gender in sociological perspective (pp. 770–779). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Riach, P., & Rich, J. (2006). An experimental investigation of sexual discrimination in hiring in the English labor market. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 6(2 (Advances)), Article 1.Google Scholar
- Rogstad, J. (1996). Etikk og metode - noen problemer i studiet av diskriminering. Sosiologisk tidsskrift, 4(3), 219–228.Google Scholar
- Roscigno, V. J. (2007). The face of discrimination: how race and gender impact work and home lives. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Statistics Norway. (2009a). Innvandrere ansatt i staten Hvorfor lavere andel enn i privat sektor? Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
- Statistics Norway. (2009b). Opplevd diskriminering blant innvandrere med bakgrunn fra ti ulike land. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
- Statistics Norway. (2011). Unge med innvandrerbakgrunn i arbeid og utdanning 2009. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
- Wood, M., Hales, J., Purdon, S., Sejersen, T., & Hayllar, O. (2009). A test for racial discrimination in recruitment practice in British cities. Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report No 607.Google Scholar