Voting Rights for Non-citizens: Treasure or Fool’s Gold?

Article

Abstract

Proposals to extend the franchise to non-citizens have recently been defended on the basis of principles of democratic inclusion that challenge the sovereign authority of states to decide who may participate as a member in the democratic constituency. Here the requirement of extending the franchise to non-citizens is considered in the context of municipalities dominated by national minorities and in light of the claims of national minorities to self-rule. In these contexts, the settlement and enfranchisement of migrants sometimes dilute the strength and increase the costs of minority nationalist policies. The political dynamics created by extending voting rights to non-citizens where national minorities struggle for self-rule illuminate that moral arguments for extending voting rights to non-citizens can confuse two issues, the first being who has the right to participate in shaping the common projects of a democratic community and the second being whose interests should be considered in the course of decision making by that community. In these contexts, non-citizens have the right to have their interests considered and to have their rights taken seriously, but they may not have a strong claim to participate as voters in community decision making.

Keywords

Voting rights Non-citizens Franchise Multinational states Democratic inclusion 

References

  1. Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic theory and border coercion: no right to unilaterally control your own borders. Political Theory, 36(1), 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfred, G. (1999). Heeding the voices of our ancestors: Kahnawake Mohawk politics and the rise of native nationalism. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Banting, K., & Soroka, S. (2012). Minority nationalism and immigrant integration in Canada. Nations and Nationalism, 18(1), 156–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauböck, R. (2005). Expansive citizenship: voting beyond territory and membership. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(4), 683–687.Google Scholar
  5. Bauböck, R. (2007). Stakeholder citizenship and transnational political participation: a normative evaluation of external voting. Fordham Law Review, 75(5), 2393–2448.Google Scholar
  6. Blake, M. (2001). Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30(3), 257–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bousetta, H. (2009). Multinational federalism and immigrant multiculturalism in Brussels. In R. Zapata Barrero (Ed.), Immigration and self-government of minority nations (pp. 87–102). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, A. (1991). Secession: The morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  9. Carens, J.H. (2005). On belonging: what we owe to people who stay. Boston Review. Available from: http://www.bostonreview.net/BR30.3/carens.php.
  10. Castiñeira, À. (2009). Immigration in multinational states. The case of Catalonia. In R. Zapata Barrero (Ed.), Immigration and self-government of minority nations (pp. 163–176). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Colino, C. (2009). Constitutional change without constitutional reform: Spanish federalism and the revision of Catalonia’s statute of autonomy. Publius, 39(2), 262–288.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, A. (2009). False and frustrated policy transfer: Spanish immigration policy and Catalonia. Policy and Politics, 37(3), 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenberg, A., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Bringing institutions back in. In A. Eisenberg & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), Identity politics in the public realm (pp. 1–30). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gagnon, A.-G. (2009). Immigration in a multinational context. From Laissez-faire to an institutional framework in Quebec. In R. Zapata Barrero (Ed.), Immigration and self-government of minority nations (pp. 39–56). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  15. Garriga, J. (2006). Los partidos catalanes, divididos ante el derecho de voto de los inmigrantes. El Pais, 19 August. http://elpais.com/diario/2006/08/19/catalunya/1155949640_850215.html.
  16. Goodin, R. (2007). Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35(1), 40–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Groenendijk, K. (2005). The legal integration of potential citizens: Denizens in the EU in the final years before the implementation of the 2003 Directive on long term resident third country nationals. In R. Baubock, E. Ersboll, K. Groenendijk, & H. Waldrauch (Eds.), Acquisition and loss of nationality: Policies and trends in 15 European states, Vol 1: comparative analysis (pp. 385–410). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, D. (1999). The debate over enfranchisement of foreign residents in Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25(4), 649–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobs, D. (2000). Giving foreigners the vote: Ethnocentrism in Dutch and Belgian political debates. In J. Ter Wal & M. Verkuyten (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on racism (pp. 117–138). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Kleiner-Liebau, D. (2009). Migration and the construction of national identity in Spain. Madrid: Iberoamericana–Vervuert.Google Scholar
  21. Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kymlicka, W. (2001). Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Labelle, M., & Rocher, F. (2009). Immigration, integration and citizenship policies in Canada and Quebec. Tug of war between competing societal projects. In R. Zapata Barrero (Ed.), Immigration and self-government of minority nations (pp. 57–86). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  24. Lenard, P., & Munro, D. (2012). Extending the franchise to non-citizen residents in Canada and the United States: How bad is the democratic deficit? In P. Lenard & R. Simeon (Eds.), Imperfect democracies: Comparing the democratic deficit in Canada and the United States. Vancouver: UBC.Google Scholar
  25. Lopez-Guerra, C. (2005). Should expatriates vote? Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(2), 216–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Margalit, A., & Raz, J. (1990). National self-determination. The Journal of Philosophy, 87(9), 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore, M. (2001). The ethics of nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Owen, D. (2011). Transnational citizenship and the democratic state. CRISPP, 14(5), 641–663.Google Scholar
  29. Owen, D. (2012). Constituting the policy, constituting the demos: on the place of the all affected interests principle in democratic theory and in resolving the democratic boundary problem. Ethics and Global Politics, 5(3), 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pardos-Prado, S., & Molins, J. M. (2009). The emergence of right-wing radicalism at the local level in Spain: the Catalan case. International Journal of Iberian Studies, 22(3), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pero, D. (2007). Migrants and the politics of governance: the case of Barcelona. Social Anthropology, 15(3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pevnick, R. (2009). Social trust and the ethics of immigration policy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 146–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pozuelo, A. (2010). Catalunya’s PP wants unemployed immigrants to leave. Spanish News, November 11, 2010. http://www.spanishnews.es/20101111-catalunyas-pp-wants-unemployed-immigrants-to-leave/id=3351/.
  34. Rubio-Marın, R. (2000). Immigration as a democratic challenge: citizenship and inclusion in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shapiro, I. (1999). Democratic justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Shapiro, I. (2003). The moral foundations of politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Siemiatycki, M. (2007). Invisible city: immigrants without voting rights in urban Ontario. Our Diverse Cities, 4(Fall), 166–168.Google Scholar
  38. Song, S. (2009). Democracy and noncitizen voting rights. Citizenship Studies, 13(6), 607–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tamir, Y. (1995). Liberal nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tremlett, G. (2010). Spanish party website drops game featuring candidate wiping out illegal immigrants. The Guardian (U.K.), November 17. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/17/peoples-party-catalonia-video.
  41. Tully, J. (1995). Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in the age of diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zapata Barrero, R. (2009a). Building a public philosophy of immigration in Catalonia. The terms of the debate. In R. Zapata Barrero (Ed.), Immigration and self-government of minority nations (pp. 125–162). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  43. Zapata Barrero, R. (2009b). Setting the research agenda on the interaction between cultural demands of immigrants and minority nations. In R. Zapata Barrero (Ed.), Immigration and self-government of minority nations (pp. 13–38). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  44. Zapata Barrero, R. (2010a). Managing diversity in Spanish society: a practical approach. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(4), 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zapata Barrero, R. (2010b). Dynamics of diversity in Spain. In S. Vertovec & S. Wessendorf (Eds.), The multicultural backlash: European discourses, politics and practices (pp. 170–189). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Zapata Barrero, R., & Gropas, R. (2012). Active immigrants in multicultural contexts: Democratic challenges in Europe. In P. Triandafyllidou, T. Modood, & N. Meer (Eds.), European multiculturalisms: Cultural, religious and ethnic challenges (pp. 167–191). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations