, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 119–135 | Cite as

Persistence of Simple Substances

  • Markku KeinänenEmail author
  • Jani Hakkarainen


In this paper, we argue for a novel three-dimensionalist (3D'ist) solution to the problem of persistence, i.e. cross-temporal identity. We restrict the discussion of persistence to simple substances, which do not have other substances as their parts. The account of simple substances employed in the paper is a trope-nominalist strong nuclear theory (SNT), which develops Peter Simons' trope nominalism. Regarding the distinction between three dimensionalism (3D) and four dimensionalism (4D), we follow Michael Della Rocca's formulation, in which 3D explains persistence in virtue of same entities and 4D in virtue of distinct entities (temporal parts). SNT is a 3D'ist position because it accounts for the persistence of simple substances in virtue of diachronically identical ‘nuclear’ tropes. The nuclear tropes of a simple substance are necessary for it and mutually rigidly dependent but distinct. SNT explains qualitative change by tropes that are contingent to a simple substance. We show that it avoids the standard problems of 3D: temporal relativization of ontic predication, Bradley's regress and coincidence, fission and fusion cases. The temporal relativization is avoided because of the analysis of temporary parts that SNT gives in terms of temporal sub-location, which is atemporal part–whole relation.


Persistence Simple substances Trope 


  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1997) A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley, F. H. (1893). Appearance and Reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, K.K. (1990). Abstract Particulars. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Candlish, S. & Basile, P. (2009). Francis Herbert Bradley. In: Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2009 Edition. Available from
  5. Crisp, T.M. & Smith, D.P. (2005). ‘Wholly present’ defined. Philosophy and the Phenomenological Research 71(2): 318-344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Della Rocca, M. (2009). Primitive Persistence and the Impasse between Three-Dimensionalism and Four-Dimensionalism, Journal of Philosophy (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Denkel, A. (1996). Object and Property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denkel, A. (1997). On the Compresence of Tropes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LVII(3): 599-606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harré, R. (1970). The Principles of Scientific Thinking. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  10. Haslanger, S. (1989). Endurance and Tempory Intrinsics. Analysis 49: 119-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawley, K. (2001). How Do Things Persist. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Hawthorne, J. (2008). Three-Dimensionalism vs. Four-Dimensionalism. In: Sider, T., Hawthorne, J. & Zimmerman, D. (Eds.) Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics (pp. 263-282). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Keinänen, M (2005). Trope Theories and the problem of Universals. Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  14. Kurtz, R.M. (2006). Introduction to Persistence: What's the Problem? In: Haslanger, S. & Kurtz, R.M. (Eds.) Persistence – Contemporary Readings (pp. 1-26). MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, D.K. (1986). On The Plurality of the Worlds. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Lowe, E.J. (1998). The Possibility of Metaphysics - Substance, Identity and Time. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Maurin, A-S. (2002). If Tropes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Maurin, A-S. (2009). Trope Theory and the Bradley's Regress. Synthese (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Mellor, D.H. (1981). Real Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Mumford, S. (2006). The Ungrounded Argument. Synthese 149: 471-489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parsons, J. (2007). Theories of Location, In: Zimmerman, D. (Ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaphysics vol. 3 (pp. 201-232). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Sider, T. (2001). Four Dimensionalism - An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Simons, P.M. (1987). Parts - a Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Simons, P.M. (1994). Particulars in Particular Clothing - Three Trope Theories of Substance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LIV(3): 553-575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simons, P.M. (2003). Tropes, Relational. Conceptus 35: 53-73.Google Scholar
  26. Simons, P.M. (2004). Extended Simples: A Third Way Between Atoms and Gunk. Monist 87: 371-384.Google Scholar
  27. Sklar, L. (1974). Space, Time, and Spacetime. University of California Press, London.Google Scholar
  28. Van Inwagen, P. (1990). Four-dimensional Objects. Nous 24: 245-255.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, D. C. (1953a). On the Elements of Being I. Review of Metaphysics 7: 3-18.Google Scholar
  30. Williams, D. C. (1953b). On the Elements of Being II. Review of Metaphysics 7: 171-192.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academy of Finland and University of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Department of Behavioural Sciences and PhilosophyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  3. 3.Academy of Finland and University of TampereTampereFinland
  4. 4.Department of History and PhilosophyUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations