, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 79–91

Naturalness, Vagueness, and Sortals



In the past few years, deflationary positions in the debate on the nature of composite material objects have become prominent. According to Ted Sider these include the thesis of quantifier variance, against which he has defended ontological realism. Recently, Sider has considered the possibility of rejecting his arguments against the vagueness of the unrestricted quantifiers in terms of translation functions. Against this strategy, he has presented an intuitive complaint and has argued that it can only be resisted if quantifier variance is accepted. But this is false. In this paper I argue, against Sider, that there is a coherent way to combine the rejection of quantifier variance with the vagueness of the unrestricted quantifiers. I sketch a model to show this, and then I consider, on the basis of it, several versions of the indeterminacy argument against the vagueness of the unrestricted quantifiers that Sider has formulated over the years.


Ontological deflationism Quantifier variance Ontological realism Vagueness Unrestricted quantifiers Indeterminacy argument 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament de Lògica, Història i Filosofia de la CiènciaLOGOS and Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations