Metaphysica

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 1–16 | Cite as

The Ontology of Products

Article
First Online:
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

We speak of products in two senses: in one, we speak of types of products, in the other we speak of the particular objects that are instances of those types. I argue that types of products have the same ontological status as that of material stuffs, like water and gold, which have a non-particular level of existence. I also argue that the relationship between types of products and their instances is logically similar to the relation of constitution, which holds between, say, gold and a ring made of gold. In my approach, types of products are concrete entities, having spatiotemporal properties. This picture fits our commonplace conception of types of products better than alternative approaches according to which types of products are universal, abstract, or mereological entities.

Keywords

Ontology Product Type Instance 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. G. Boolos, “To Be Is To Be a Value of a Variable (or to Be Some Values of Some Variables”, Journal of Philosophy 81 (1984): 430–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. G. Boolos, “Nominalist Platonism”, Philosophical Review 94 (1985): 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. M.B. Burke, “Coinciding Objects: Reply to Lowe and Denkel”, Analysis 57 (1997): 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. M.B. Burke, “Cohabitation, Stuff and Intermittent Existence”, Mind 89 (1980): 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. H.M. Cartwright, “Quantities”, Philosophical Review, 79 (1970): 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Laycock, “Some Questions of Ontology”, The Philosophical Review 81 (1972): 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. H. Laycock, “Theories of Matter”, Synthese 31 (1975): 411–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Laycock, Words without Objects, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ø. Lynnebo, “Plural Quantification Exposed”, Nous 37 (2003): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ø. Lynnebo and D. Nicolas, “Superplurals in English”, Analysis 68 (2008): 186–197.Google Scholar
  11. E.J. Lowe, The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. A. Rayo, “Words and Objects”, Nous 36 (2002): 436–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Rayo, “Beyond Plurals”, in A. Rayo and G. Uzquiano (eds), Absolute Generality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, pp. 220–254.Google Scholar
  14. P.F. Strawson, Individuals, Methuen, London, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations