Metaphysica

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 89–95 | Cite as

Does Blackburn’s Expressivism Have a Problem with Respect to Supervenience? A Reply to Wright and Zangwill

Article

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the expressivist account of moral supervenience that Simon Blackburn has offered. First, the account is presented, and an objection to it is thereafter discussed. In short, the objection is that the supervenience constraint in moral discourse is mysterious, given that no similar constraint governs speech and thought in other areas of discourse that seem to be prime candidates for an expressivist analysis. The conclusion of the paper is that this objection can be fended off.

Keywords

Metaethics Expressivism Supervenience Extrinsic properties 

References

  1. Blackburn, S. 1984: Spreading the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blackburn, S. 1985: “Supervenience Revisited”. Hacking, I. (ed.). Exercises in Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Currie, G. 1989: The Ontology of Art. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Heil, J. 1998: “Supervenience Deconstructed”. European Journal of Philosophy 6 2, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horgan, T. 1982: “Supervenience and Microphysics”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 63, 29–43.Google Scholar
  6. Kim, J. 1987: ‘“Strong” and “Global” Supervenience Revisited’. Reprinted in Kim 1993, Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Klagge, J. 1988: “Supervenience: Ontological and Ascriptive”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 66 number 4.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, D. 1983: “Extrinsic Properties”. Philosophical Studies 44.Google Scholar
  9. Wright, C. 1985: “Review of Spreading the Word”. Mind 94, 310–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zangwill, N. 1995: “Moral Supervenience”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XX.Google Scholar
  11. Zangwill, N. 2001: The Metaphysics of Beauty. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyGeorgetown UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations