, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 247–250 | Cite as

Joseph E. Brenner, Logic in Reality, Springer 2008

ISBN 978-1-4020-8374-7
  • Uwe MeixnerEmail author

When analytic philosophers in the tradition of Carnap and Quine recommended the use of modern logic—the father of which was Gottlob Frege—then, they did so on the basis of the conviction that the use of logic in its modern form would increase the clarity and the stringency of philosophical argumentation. I happen to share this conviction, which is old-fashioned these days. I am not shaken in this conviction by a book like Brenner’s, which is called Logic in Reality, but contains hardly anything that is stringent and hardly anything which is clear—and little where a reader like me feels that he is making contact with reality. For the badness of the book is not the result of a use of logic. In Brenner’s eyes, “[t]he real world is only possible because it is conditionally logically contradictory, that is, partly inconsistent” (p. 134). Well, if that is the case and partial inconsistency is a necessary condition of reality, even of possibility, then it must be a methodological rule to be...


Actual World Classical Logic Logical Constant Combinatorial Analysis Logical Necessity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations