A Novel Category of Vague Abstracta
- 61 Downloads
Much attention has been given to the question of ontic vagueness, and the issues usually center around whether certain paradigmatically concrete entities - cats, clouds, mountains, etc. - are vague in the sense of having indeterminate spatial boundaries. In this paper, however, I wish to focus on a way in which some abstracta seem to be locationally vague. To begin, I will briefly cover some territory already covered regarding certain types of “traditional” abstracta and the ways they are currently alleged to be vague. I then wish to discuss two types of “nontraditional” abstracta and the sense in which I think some of these objects are locationally vague. I will next reexamine some of the traditional abstracta and discuss whether any of these objects are locationally vague in the novel way suggested for the nontraditional sorts. I’ll finish by discussing objections, and conclude with some remarks about characterizing the abstract/concrete distinction.
KeywordsFictional Character Spatiotemporal Location Determinate Location Vague Object Concrete Entity
- Burgess, J, and Rosen, G. A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. New York: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- Heller, M. “Against Metaphysical Vagueness.” Philosophical Perspectives: Metaphysics 10 (1996): 177–185.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S. Reference and Existence: The John Locke Lectures for 1973. Unpublished.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
- Merricks, T. “Varieties of Vagueness.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62:1 (2001): 145–157.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T., and Woodruff, P. “Worldly Indeterminacy of Identity.” Vagueness: A Reader. Eds. KEEFE, R., and SMITH, P. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999. 321–337.Google Scholar
- Rosen, G. “Abstract Objects,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2001 Edition), ZALTA, E. (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2001/entries/abstract objects/>.
- Saisnsbury, R. M. “Concepts Without Boundaries.” Vagueness: A Reader. Eds. Keefe, R., and Smith, P. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999. 251–264.Google Scholar
- Simons, P. Parts: A Study in Ontology. New York: Oxford Press, 1987.Google Scholar
- Thomasson, A. Fiction and Metaphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Van Inwagen, P. “Creatures of Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14:4 (1977): 299–308.Google Scholar