Urban Forum

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 189–203

Towards Effective City Planning—The Case of Cape Town in Identifying Potential Housing Land

  • Mercy Brown-Luthango
  • Prestige Makanga
  • Julian Smit
Article

Abstract

Vacant land in cities is an important resource as it presents opportunities for urban renewal and revitalisation and can contribute to municipal revenue. In a context of growing informality and homelessness in cities of the South, the presence of large tracts of vacant land is a sign of inefficient urban planning and a dysfunctional land market. It is therefore critical for local governments to have reliable data of the extent of vacant land parcels in cities and their potential for housing development, particularly affordable housing for the poor. This paper will detail and discuss the “Potential Housing Land Model” developed by the Cape Urban Observatory, part of the African Centre for Cities, based at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. South African cities, and in this case the city of Cape Town in particular, face huge constraints in terms of suitable, well-located and affordable land for low-cost housing development. A tool like the “Potential Housing Land Tool” is one tool which could assist decision-makers in identifying such land parcels. Besides identifying land that can potentially be used for housing; the model can also allow officials to pin-point areas that are not well-serviced. The deployment of the model on the World Wide Web makes the tool available to a range of users including municipal officials, academic researchers and organised sectors of civil society who might benefit from this kind of information. The responsible and strategic use of this model and the information it provides, can facilitate a broad-based discussion about vacant land and its potential use in the city, allowing for more transparent and participatory planning. The application of tools like the “Potential Housing Land Tool” can therefore greatly assist in improving urban governance and can contribute towards more efficient and sustainable urban planning and management systems.

Keywords

Vacant land Under-utilised land Urban planning Spatial analysis tools Informality Low-cost housing development 

References

  1. Adams, D., Disberry, A., Hutchison, N., and Munjoma, T. (2001). “Ownership constraints to brownfields redevelopment”, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 33.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, D., Disberry, A., Hutchison, N., and Munjoma, T. (2002). “Vacant urban land: exploring ownership strategies and actions”, TPR, Vol. 73, Number 4.Google Scholar
  3. Bertaud, A. (2010). “Land markets, government interventions and housing affordability”, Wolfensohn Center for Development at Brookings, Working Paper 18.Google Scholar
  4. Brown-Luthango, M. (2010). “Access to land for the urban poor—Policy proposals for South African cities, Urban Forum, Vol. 21.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, J., and Smith, L.B. (1975). “Public land banking and the Price of Land”, Land Economics, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
  6. City of Cape Town (2010). “City of Cape Town—five year plan for Cape Town, Integrated Development Plan (IDP) 2007- 2012.Google Scholar
  7. De Sousa, C. A. (2002). “Brownfield redevelopment in Toronto: an examination of past trends and future prospects, Land Use Policy, Vol. 19.Google Scholar
  8. Dewar, D (2006). The relevance of the compact city approach: The management of urban growth in South African cities in compact cities. In M. Jenks and R. Burgess (Eds.), Sustainable urban forms for developing countries. London and New York: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Genesis Analytics (2008). “The dynamics of the formal urban land market in South Africa”. A report prepared for Urban LandMark by Genesis Analytics.Google Scholar
  10. Larangeira, A. (2003). “Vacant land in Latin America: Challenges and opportunities”, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  11. Lloyd, E and Vincent, J. (2008). “The Taxation of Land Values in New York City: Theory and Options” – A report to the Manhattan Borough President, Centre for the Study of Economics.Google Scholar
  12. Mhatre, P. (n.d.). “Vacant and abandoned lands: A theory paper”. Plan 629: Neighbourhood Revitalisation.Google Scholar
  13. Napier, M. (2007). “Making urban land markets work better in South African cities and towns: Arguing the basis for access by the poor”. Fourth Urban Research Symposium 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Pagano, M.A. and Bowman, A. (2000). “Vacant land in cities: An urban resource”. The Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Survey SeriesGoogle Scholar
  15. Palmer Development Group and Isandla Institute (2009). “Municipal can municipal rates policies promote access by the poor to urban land markets?” South African Cities Network and Urban Landmark.Google Scholar
  16. Pillay U, Tomlinson R, du Toit J (2006) “Introduction” in democracy and delivery: urban policy in South Africa. HSRC, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodriques, E., Gie, J., and Haskins, G. (2006). “Informal dwelling count for Cape Town (1993-2005)”, Information and Knowledge Management Department, Strategic Information Branch.Google Scholar
  18. South African Cities Network (2006). “State of the Cities Report”.Google Scholar
  19. South African Cities Network (2011). “State of the Cities Report”.Google Scholar
  20. Todes A, Kok P, Wentzel M, van Zyl J, Cross C (2010) Contemporary South African urbanisation dynamics. Urban Forum 21:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mercy Brown-Luthango
    • 1
  • Prestige Makanga
    • 1
  • Julian Smit
    • 1
  1. 1.African Centre for Cities, Room 2.08.1, Shell Environmental and Geographical Science BuildingUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations