Knowledge, Technology & Policy

, Volume 23, Issue 3–4, pp 483–486 | Cite as

Nudges and Cultural Variance: a Note on Selinger and Whyte

Special Issue

Abstract

Selinger and Whyte argue that Thaler and Sunstein are insufficiently sensitive to cultural variance in Nudge. I construct a taxonomy of the various roles that cultural variance may play in nudges. First, biases that are exploited in nudging may interact with features that are culturally specific. Second, cultures may be more or less susceptible to certain biases. Third, cultures may resolve conflicting biases in different ways. And finally, nudge may be enlisted for different aims in different cultures.

Keywords

Nudges Biases Cultural variance 

References

  1. Bovens, L. (2008). The ethics of nudge. In T. Grüne-Yanoff & S. O. Hansson (Eds.), Preference change: Approaches from philosophy, economics and psychology. Berlin: Springer. Theory and Decision Library A, Chapter 10. pp. 207–220.Google Scholar
  2. Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  3. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, S. (1989). Civilisation and its discontents. New York: Norton. Translated by James Strachey.Google Scholar
  5. Gawronski, B., Peters, K. R., & Strack, F. (2008). Cross-cultural differences versus Universality in cognitive dissonance: A conceptual reanalysis. In R. M. Sorrentino & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovitz, M. J. (1966). The influence of culture on visual perception. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  7. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Time and Date. (2010) Brief history on daylight savings time in Europe. http://www.timeanddate.com/time/europe/daylight-saving-history.html. Accessed 1 June 2010

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific MethodLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations