Advertisement

Knowledge, Technology & Policy

, Volume 23, Issue 1–2, pp 177–192 | Cite as

How to Design the Infosphere: the Fourth Revolution, the Management of the Life Cycle of Information, and Information Ethics as a Macroethics

  • Wolfgang Hofkirchner
Special Issue

Abstract

The paper reconstructs the read thread that links the information revolution, the information concept and information ethics in Floridi’s philosophy of information. In doing so, it acknowledges the grand attempt but doubts whether this attempt is up to the state of affairs concerning the actual point human history has reached. It contends that the information age is rather conceivable as a critical stage in which human evolution as a whole is at stake. The mastering of this crisis depends on an appropriate shaping of Information and Communication Technologies which requires ethical considerations. In this respect, Floridi’s notion of the fourth revolution, his assumption of the management of the life cycle of information, and his ontocentric macroethics will be discussed in the light of the term “scientific-technological revolution”, the idea of a noogenesis, a new way of thinking and new weltanschauung, the concept of friction in social and physical aspects, the concept of collective intelligence and its application to the Internet and last, but not least, the vision of a Global Sustainable Information Society.

Keywords

Scientific-technological revolution Noosphere Self-organisation Social friction Collective intelligence Global Sustainable Information Society Meaningful technology 

References

  1. Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Banathy, B. H. (2000). Guided evolution of society. A systems view. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Bernal, J. D. (1954). Science in history. London: Watts.Google Scholar
  4. Bialas, V. (1978). Wissenschaftliche und technische Revolutionen in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein.Google Scholar
  5. Bialas, V. (1990). Allgemeine Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
  6. Capurro, R. (2008). On Floridi’s metaphysical foundation of information ecology. http://www.capurro.de/floridi.html. Accessed 21 April 2010.
  7. Capurro, R. (2009). Towards a comparative theory of agents. http://www.capurro.de/agents.html. Accessed 24 April 2010.
  8. Floridi, L. (2007). A look into the future impact of ICT on our lives. The Information Society, 23(1), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Floridi, L. (2010). Information. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gershenson, C. (2010). Design and control of self-organizing systems: facing complexity with adaptation and self-organization. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Heylighen, F. (2007). Accelerating socio-technological evolution: from ephemeralization and stigmergy to the global brain. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/AcceleratingEvolution.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2010.
  12. Hofkirchner, W. (1994a). On the philosophy of design and assessment of technology. In S. Katsikides (Ed.), Informatics, Organization and Society (pp. 38–46). Wien: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  13. Hofkirchner, W. (1994b). Öko-Ethik: Von Spinoza zum New Age? In E. Balibar, H. Seidel, & M. Walther (Eds.), Freiheit und Notwendigkeit, Ethische und politische Aspekte bei Spinoza und in der Geschichte des (Anti-)Spinozismus (pp. 241–249). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  14. Hofkirchner, W. (2000). Tin hoc va xa hoi [Informatics and Society]. In J. Becker & Dinh Dang Ngoc (Eds.), Internet o Viet Nam va cac nuoc dang phat trien [Internet in Vietnam and other developing countries] (pp. 73–84). Ha Noi: Nha Xuat Ban Khoa Hoc Va Ky Thuat.Google Scholar
  15. Lévy, P. Cyberspace as a metaevolutive step. http://www.planetwork.net/2000conf/presenters/levy_text.html. Accessed 23 April 2010.
  16. Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity. The co-evolution of humans and machines. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Morin, E. (1999). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Translated by Poller Nidra. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=2735&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Accessed 21 April 2010.
  18. Richta, R. (1977). The scientific and technological revolution and the prospects of social development. In R. Dahrendorf (Ed.), Scientific-Technological Revolution, Social Aspects (pp. 25–72). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Salk, J. (1983). Anatomy of reality: Merging of intuition and reason. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schäfer, L. (1993). Das Bacon-Projekt. Von der Erkenntnis, Nutzung und Schonung der Natur. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. Standage, T. (1998). The Victorian Internet. The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century’s online pioneers. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  22. Sueß, E. (1875). Die Entstehung der Alpen. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
  23. Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1961). Die Entstehung des Menschen. München: Beck (French: Le groupe zoologique humain).Google Scholar
  24. Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1964). Auswahl aus dem Werk. Freiburg: Olten(French: La vision du passé).Google Scholar
  25. Vernadskij, V. I. (1997). Der Mensch in der Biosphäre. Zur Naturgeschichte der Vernunft. Wien: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  26. Vernadsky, V.I. (1998). The biosphere. Foreword by Lynn Margulis and colleagues. Introduction by Jacques Grinevald. Translated by David B. Langmuir. Revised and annotated by Mark A.S. McMenamin. New York: Copernicus (Springer). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Design and Technology AssessmentVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations