Knowledge, Technology & Policy

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 62–85

Building the virtual city: Public participation through e-democracy

  • Andrew Hudson-Smith
  • Stephen Evans
  • Michael Batty
Articles

Abstract

In this paper, we outline how we have developed a series of technologies that enable planning information to be disseminated to affected citizens so that professionals and politicians can engage with these stakeholders in realizing more effective plans. Our main theme is based on the generic idea of the “virtual city” which is conceived in terms of the geography and geometry of the real city. This is a digital representation using a variety of software and multimedia, made interactively available over the web. We begin with a brief comment on different types of virtual city and then summarize the key problems of using such virtualities in public participation, more recently considered as part of the e-democracy movement. We outline our previous attempts to engage in such online participation in east London for these have been an essential prerequisite to the development of “Virtual London,” the application reported here which is currently being fashioned for widespread dissemination of planning information by the Greater London Authority (GLA). We then argue that virtual cities should go well beyond the traditional conceptions of 3D GIS and CAD into virtual worlds and online design. But we also urge caution in pushing the digital message too far, showing how more conventional tangible media is always necessary in rooting such models in more realistic and familiar representations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnstein, S.R. (1969). “A Ladder of Citizen Participation,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.Google Scholar
  2. Batty, M., Chapman, D., Evans, S., Haklay, M., Kueppers, S., Shiode, N., Smith, A., and Torrens, P. (2001). “Visualizing the City: Communicating Urban Design to Planners and Decision-Makers, in R. Brail and R. Klosterman (Eds.), Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, 405–443.Google Scholar
  3. Batty, M., Dodge, M., Doyle, S., and Smith, A. (1998). Modelling Virtual Environments, in P.A. Longley, S. Brooks, R. McDonnell, and B. Macmillan (Eds.), Geocomputation: A Primer, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 139–161.Google Scholar
  4. Batty, M., and Hudson-Smith, A. (2001). Virtuality and Cities: Definitions, Geographies, Designs, in P.F. Fisher, and D.B. Unwin (Eds.), Virtual Reality in Geography, Taylor and Francis, London, 270–291.Google Scholar
  5. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  6. Calvino, I. (1974). Invisible Cities, Harcourt Brace and Company, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Dutton, W.H., Blumler, J.G., and Kraemer, K.L. (1987). Wired Cities: Shaping the Future of Communications, G. K. Hall, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  8. GLA. (2003). Londoners On-Line: An Analysis of Levels of Home Internet Access from the London Household Survey 2002, Greater London Authority, Queens Walk, London.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, S. (2004). The Cybercities Reader, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  10. Hudson-Smith, A. (2003). Digitally Distributed Urban Environments: The Prospects for Online Planning, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  11. Hudson-Smith, A., Evans, S., Batty, M., and Batty, S. (2003) “Experiments in Web-Based GIS,” in P.A. Longley and M. Batty (Eds.), Advanced Spatial Analysis: The CASA Book of GIS, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, 369–390.Google Scholar
  12. Kingston, R. (2002). “Web-Based PPGIS in the United Kingdom,” in W.J. Craig, T.M. Harris, and D. Weiner (Eds.) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems, Taylor and Francis, London, 101–112.Google Scholar
  13. MHLG. (1969). People and Planning, Report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (The Skeffington Report), Ministry of Housing and Local Government (MHLG), HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  14. Negroponte, N. (1973). The Architecture Machine, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. OED. (1974). The Concise Oxford Dictionary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Schroeder, R., Huxor, A., and Smith, A. (2001). “ActiveWorlds: Geography and Social Interaction in Virtual Reality,” Futures, 33, 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shiffer, M.J. (2001). “Spatial Multimedia for Planning Support,” in R. Brail and R. Klosterman (Eds.), Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, 361–385.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, A. (2002) 30 Days in ActiveWorlds: “Community, Design and Terrorism in a Virtual World,” in R. Shroeder (Ed.), The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments, Springer, Berlin, 77–89.Google Scholar
  19. Thrift, N. and French, S. (2002). The Automatic Production of Space, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS 27, 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Hudson-Smith
    • 1
  • Stephen Evans
  • Michael Batty
  1. 1.the Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA)University College London (UCL)UK

Personalised recommendations