Advertisement

Knowledge, Technology & Policy

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 56–73 | Cite as

Inter-organizational collaboration, knowledge intensity, and the sources of innovation in the bioscience-technology industries

  • Kelvin Willoughby
  • Peter Galvin
Article

Abstract

What makes some firms more innovative than others and what determines the source of these innovations are questions that are still not adequately answered due to the complex, often esoteric, nature of the innovation process. This paper considers the effect of one externally oriented strategy (extent of formal inter-organizational linkages) and one internally oriented strategy (degree of knowledge intensity) on overall levels of innovativeness and the source of these innovations. Using data collected from firms operating in the bioscience-technology industries in both New York and Utah, our results suggest that both of these strategies have a significant effect upon innovation levels and the source of innovation (internally versus externally stimulated). Interestingly, there were few firms that undertook both of these strategies simultaneously and thus the proposed interaction effect where increased absorptive capacity (on the basis of knowledge intensity) would make external linkages even more valuable could not be discerned.

Keywords

Absorptive Capacity Strategic Alliance Strategic Management Journal Trade Secret External Linkage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alam, I. (2003). Commercial Innovations from Consulting Engineering Firms: An Empirical Exploration of a Novel Source of New Product Ideas. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 20, 300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. and Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J. and Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and limitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal 43, 909–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). ‘Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review 20, 343–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I. and Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation 24, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiesa, V. and Toletti, G. (2004). Network of Collaborations for Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 16, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, K. B. and Wheelwright, S. C. (1992). Organizing and leading “heavyweight” development teams. California Management Review 34(3), 9–28.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodgson, M. (1994). Technological Collaboration and Innovation, in M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cornwall: Edward Elgar, 285–292.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy 20, 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Research Policy 21, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goes, J. B. and Park, S. H. (1997). Inter-organizational Links and Innovation: The Case of Hospital Services. Academy of Management Journal 40, 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant, R. M. (1996). Towards a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griliches, Z. (1987). R&D, Patent and Productivity. National Bureau of Economic Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gulati, R. (1995). Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 619–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances. Strategic Management Journal 12, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hauschildt, J. (1992). External Acquisition of Knowledge for Innovations—A Research Agenda. R&D Management 22(2), 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herstatt, C. and von Hippel, E. (1992). Developing New Product Concepts via Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech Field”. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Josty, P. L. (1990). ‘A Tentative Model of the Innovation Process’, R&D Management 20(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahn, K. B., Franzak, F., Griffin, A., Kohn, S. and Miller, C. W. (2003). Editorial: Identification and Consideration of Emerging Research Question’. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khanna, T., Gulati, R. and Nohria, N. (1998). The Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation and Relative Scope. Strategic Management Journal 19, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khurana, A. and Rosenthal, S. R. (1998). Towards Holistic ‘Front Ends’ in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kogut, B. (1988). A Study of the Life Cycle of Joint Ventures, in F. Contractor and R. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, New York: Lexington Books, 169–185.Google Scholar
  25. McAdam, R. and McClelland, J. (2002). Sources of new product ideas and creativity practices in the UK textile industry. Technovation 22, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E. and Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, (Special Winter Issue), 77–91.Google Scholar
  27. Myers, S. and Marquis, D. G. (1969). Successful Industrial Innovation, Washington DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5, 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nonaka, I. and Takeushi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  30. Osland, G. and Yaprak, A. (1995) Learning Through Strategic Alliances: Processes and Factors that Enhance Marketing Effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing 29, 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quinitas, P., Wield, D. and Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12, 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990’s. R&D Management 22, 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaw, B. (1986). Appropriation and Transfer of Innovation Benefit in the UK Medical Equipment Industry. Technovation, 4,Google Scholar
  34. Shaw, B. (1993). Formal and Informal Networks in the UK Medical Equipment Industry, Technovation, 13, 6,Google Scholar
  35. Sunman, H. (1987). Science Parks, Technopoles and Innovation Centres: The European Experience. Int. J. of Technology Management, 2, 142–145.Google Scholar
  36. Tang, H. K. (1998) An Integrative Model of Innovation in Organizations. Technovation, 18, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teece, D. J. (1989). Innovation and the Organization of Industry. CCC Working Paper 90-6. Centre for Research in Management, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  38. Ticehurst, G. W. and Veal, A. J. (1999). Business Research Methods: A Managerial Approach, Sydney: Addison Wesley Longman Australia.Google Scholar
  39. Von Hippel, E. (1978). Successful Industrial Products From Customer Ideas. Journal of Marketing 42, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation, New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. von Krogh, G., Roos, J. and Slocum, K. (1994). An essay on corporate epistemology. Strategic Management Journal 15, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Willoughby, K. W. (1997). New York’s Evolving Bioscience Technology Industries: Managing Knowledge, Production and Services for Economic Development. Stony Brook, New York: State University of New York, Center for Biotechnology, 1997.Google Scholar
  43. Willoughby, K. W. (2004). The Affordable Resources strategy and the Milieux Embeddedness strategy as alternative approaches to facilitating innovation in a knowledge-intensive industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research 15, 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelvin Willoughby
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Galvin
    • 3
  1. 1.the Management of Technologythe University of MinnesotaUSA
  2. 2.the Management of Technology Program in the Center for the Development of Technological LeadershipUK
  3. 3.the Graduate School of ManagementCurtin University of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations