Advertisement

Ageing International

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 223–233 | Cite as

Social Participation Types and Benefits on Health Outcomes for Elder People: a Systematic Review

  • Ausanee WanchaiEmail author
  • Duangjai Phrompayak
Article
  • 146 Downloads

Abstract

The Purpose of this systematic review was to examine patterns of social participation and their benefits on health outcomes of elder people. Published articles written in English from 2006 to 2016 were searched from electronic databases, including PubMed. Science Direct, and CINAHL, as well as hand search for unpublished papers. The results showed that 6 papers met the inclusion criteria. The social participation patterns in elder people could be categorized into 2 patterns, including: (1) collective participation, (2) productive participation. Both social participation patterns could improve psychosocial issues of elder people. Therefore, the authors suggested that to succeed in promoting healthy ageing for these people, health care providers should encourage older people to engage in social activities. However, more rigorous research is also needed to confirm the correlation between social participation types and health benefits among these older people.

Keywords

Systematic review Social participation Older people Ageing Healthy ageing Health and well being 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the Praboromarajchanok Institute of Heath Workforce Development, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Author Ausanee Wanchai and author Duangjai Phrompayak declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent is not required on this study.

Ethical Treatment of Experimental Subjects (Animal and Human)

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Amagasa, S., Fukushima, N., Kikuchi, H., Oka, K., Takamiya, T., Odagiri, Y., & Inoue, S. (2017). Types of social participation and psychological distress in Japanese older adults: a five-year cohort study. PLoS One, 12(4), e0175392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bukov, A., Maas, I., & Lampert, T. (2002). Social participation in very old age: cross- sectional and longitudinal findings from BASE. Journal of Gerontology, 57(6), 510–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr, D. C., Fried, L. P. & Rowe, J. W. (2015). Productivity & engagement in an aging America: the role of volunteerism. Dædalus, Journal of the Academy, 144(2): 55–67.Google Scholar
  4. Dahan-Oliel, N., Gelinas, I., & Mazer, B. (2008). Social participation in the elderly: What does the literature tell us? Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 20(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Douglas, H., Georgiou, A., & Westbrook, J. (2016). Social participation as an indicator of successful aging: An overview of concepts and their associations with health. Australian Health Review. Resource document. http://www.publish.csiro.au/AH/pdf/AH16038. Accessed 25 Nov 2017.
  6. Golinowska, S., Groot, W., Baji, P., & Pavlova, M. (2016). Health promotion targeting older people. BMC Health Services Research, 16 (Suppl. 5), 345. Resource document.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1514-3. Accessed 25 Nov 2017.
  7. Holmes, W. R., & Joseph, J. (2011). Social participation and healthy ageing: a neglected, significant protective factor for chronic non-communicable conditions. Globalization and Health, 7, 43.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-7-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Komatsu, H., Yagasaki, K., Saito, Y., & Oguma, Y. (2017). Regular group exercise contributes to balanced health in older adults in Japan: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 17, 190.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0584-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levasseur, M., Richard, L., Gauvin, L., & Raymond, E. (2010). Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2141–2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Low, L. F., Baker, J. R., Harrison, F., Jeon, Y. H., Haertsch, M., Camp, C., & Skropeta, M. (2015). The lifestyle engagement activity program (LEAP): implementing social and recreational activity into case-managed home care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16(12), 1069–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Melillo, K. D., Williamson, E., Houde, S.C., Futrell, M., Read, C. Y., & Campasano, M. (2001). Perceptions of older Latino adults regarding physical fitness, physical activity, and exercise. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 27(9):38-46.Google Scholar
  12. Mendoza-Ruvalcaba, N. M., & Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. (2016). Effectiveness of the vital aging program to promote active aging in Mexican older adults. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 11, 1631–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Novek, S., Menec, V., Tran, T., & Bell, S. (2013). Exploring the impacts of senior centres on older adults. Winnipeg: Centre on Aging.Google Scholar
  15. Park, D. C., Lodi-Smith, J., Drew, L., Haber, S., Hebrank, A., Bischof, G. N., & Aamodt, W. (2014). The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: the synapse project. Psychological Science, 25(1), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parnell, D., Pringle, A., McKenna, J., Zwolinsky, S., Rutherford, Z., Hargreaves, J., Trotter, L., Rigby, M., & Richardson, D. (2015). Reaching older people with PA delivered in football clubs: The reach, adoption and implementation characteristics of the extra time programme. BMC Pubic Health, Resource document https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4397882/. Accessed 25 Nov 2017.
  17. Sakurai, R., Yasunaga, M., Murayama, Y., Ohba, H., Nonaka, K., Suzuki, H., et al. (2016). Long-term effects of an intergenerational program on functional capacity in older adults: results from a seven-year follow-up of the REPRINTS study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 64, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sirven, N. & Debrand, T. (2008). Promoting social participation for healthy ageing an international comparison of Europeans aged fifty and over. Resource document http://www.share-project.org/fileadmin/pdf_publications/S-Z/Sirven_Debrand_08.pdf. Access 25 Nov 2017.
  19. Stav, W. B., Hallenen, T., Lane, J., & Arbesman, M. (2012). Systematic review of occupational engagement and health outcomes among community-dwelling older adults. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(3), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steelman, V. M., Pape, T., King, C. A., Graling, P., & Gaberson, K. B. (2011). Selection of a method to rate the strength of scientific evidence for AORN recommendations. AORN Journal, 93(4), 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Payne, B., Roberts, B. W., Kramer, A. F., Morrow, D. G., Payne, L., et al. (2014). Training versus engagement as paths to cognitive enrichment with aging. Psychology and Aging, 29(4), 891–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. United Nations. (2015). World population ageing 2015. Resource document http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2017.
  23. World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health. Resource document http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/9789240694811_eng.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boromarajonani College of Nursing BuddhachinarajPhitsanulokThailand

Personalised recommendations