Ageing International

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 82–101 | Cite as

Applying the Disruptive Innovation Framework to the Silver Market

Technology Adoption and Deployment for Older Consumers
Article

Abstract

Despite the increased attention that the topic of aging and technology is receiving from academia, policy and business practice, both conceptual and empirical research in this area is still scarce. Particularly, there seems to be a dearth of applications of well-grounded and established frameworks from the field of innovation and technology management to the case of older consumers and the “silver market.” Through an approach that combines conceptual development with explorative empirical research using the disruptive innovation framework, we find that: 1) the silver market is an excellent field of application for low-end disruptions as elderly customers will increasingly demand just-good-enough performance—easy and safe to use—and affordable products and services; 2) the silver market is an excellent field of application for new market disruptions as elderly customers will increasingly demand new products and services they had not demanded or had not been able to demand before; 3) transgenerational and ageless products and services are an excellent field of application for disruptive innovations; 4) disruptive innovations for the silver market are particularly effective and easy to adopt and use due to their good-enough functionality and performance (including ease of use) and affordability, and this helps to increase their diffusion among older consumers.

Keywords

Adoption of technology Diffusion of innovation Disruptive innovation Japan Older consumer Silver market 

References

  1. Adner, R. (2002). When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 667–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barak, B., & Schiffman, L. G. (1981). Cognitive age: A nonchronological variable. In K. B. Monroe (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 8, pp. 602–606). Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  3. Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Putney, N. M., & Silverstein, M. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of Theories of Aging (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bröring, S., Cloutier, L. M., & Leker, J. (2006). The front end of innovation in an era of industry convergence: evidence from nutraceuticals and functional foods. R&D Management, 36(5), 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burdick, D. C., & Kwon, S. (Eds.). (2004). Gerotechnology: Research and practice in technology and aging. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (2004). New challenges for R&D management. In European Institute for Technology and Innovation Management (Ed.), Bringing technology and innovation into the boardroom: Strategy, innovation and competences for business value (pp. 269–291). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, C. M. (2006). The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., & Roth, E. A. (2004). Seeing what's next: Using the theories of innovation to predict industry change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  11. Coulmas, F., Conrad, H., Schad-Seifert, A., & Vogt, G. (Eds.). (2008). The demographic challenge: A handbook about Japan. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Cutler, S. J. (2005). Ageism and technology. Generations, 29(3), 67–72.Google Scholar
  13. Czaja, S. J., Guerrier, J. H., Nair, S. N., & Landauer, T. K. (1993). Computer communication as an aid to independence for older adults. Behaviour & Information Technology, 12(4), 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czaja, S. J., & Schulz, R. (2006). Innovations in technology and aging: Introduction. Generations, 30(2), 6–8.Google Scholar
  15. Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (1998). Age differences in attitudes toward computers. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological sciences, 53B(5), 329–340.Google Scholar
  16. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  17. Drucker, P. F. (2002). Managing in the next society. New York: Truman Talley Books, St. Martin's Griffin.Google Scholar
  18. Druehl, C. T., & Schmidt, G. M. (2008). A strategy for opening a new market and encroaching on the lower end of the existing market. Production and Operations Management, 17(1), 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitzgerald, T. K. (1999). The elderly at the millennium: courting the older consumer. Ageing International, 25(1), 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilly, M. C., & Zeithaml, V. (1985). The elderly consumer and adoption of technologies. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gitlin, L. N. (1995). Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations, 19(1), 41–46.Google Scholar
  22. Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006a). Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. (2006b). The usefulness of measuring disruptiveness of innovations ex post in making ex ante predictions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, J. K., & Martin, M. J. C. (2005). Disruptive technologies, stakeholders and the innovation value-added chaing: a framework for evaluating radical technology development. R&D Management, 35(3), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hooyman, N. R., & Kiyak, H. A. (2005). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspektive. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  26. Hough, M., & Kobylanski, A. (2009). Increasing elder consumer interactions with information technology. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hüsig, S., Hipp, C., & Dowling, M. (2005). Analysing disruptive potential: the case of wireless local area network and mobile communications network companies. R&D Management, 35(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Irie, T., Matsunaga, K., & Nagano, Y. (2005). Universal design activities for mobile phone: Raku Raku PHONE. Fujitsu Scientific and Technical Journal, 41(1), 78–85.Google Scholar
  29. Kawamoto, H., & Sankai, Y. (2005). Power assist method based on phase sequence and muscle force condition for HAL. Advanced Robotics, 19(7), 717–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kinney, J. M., Kart, C. S., Murdoch, L. D., & Ziemba, T. F. (2003). Challenges in caregiving and creative solutions: using technology to facilitate caring for a relative with dementia. Ageing International, 28(3), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohlbacher, F., & Hang, CC (2007). Disruptive innovations and the graying market. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 1915–1919), Singapore.Google Scholar
  32. Kohlbacher, F., & Herstatt, C. (2009). "Silver Products" development: The reality of R&D in firms in Japan. Paper presented at the The R&D Management Conference 2009, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  33. Kohlbacher, F., & Herstatt, C. (Eds.). (2008). The silver market phenomenon: Business opportunities in an era of demographic change. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Kohlbacher, F., & Hideg, A. (2010). Raku-Raku Phone: Einfach telefonieren—einfach erfolgreich. JapanMarkt, May 2010, 22–25.Google Scholar
  35. Lai, O.-K. (2008). The enigma of Japanese ageing-in-place practice in the information age: Does digital gadget help the (good) practice for inter-generation care? Ageing International, 32(3), 236–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Langer, J. (1984). Changing demographics: stimulus for new product ideas. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1(2), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levkoff, S. E. (2000). Graying of Japan: Choju shakai. Ageing International, 26(1–2), 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lunsford, D. A., & Burnett, M. S. (1992). Marketing product innovations to the elderly: understanding the barriers to adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(4), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Magnus, G. (2009). The age of aging: How demographics are changing the global economy and our world. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar
  40. Mann, W. C. (Ed.). (2005). Smart technology for aging, disability, and independence: The state of the science. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive innovation: in need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mathur, A. (1999). Adoption of technological innovations by the elderly: a consumer socialization perspective. The Journal of Marketing Management, 9(3), 21–35.Google Scholar
  43. McMellon, C. A., & Schiffman, L. G. (2002). Cybersenior empowerment: how some older individuals are taking control of their lives. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 21(2), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Moore, K. (2008). Can the internet improve the well-being of the elderly? Ageing International, 32(1), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moody, H. R. (2002). Aging: Concepts and controversies (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Moschis, G. P. (1996). Gerontographics: Life-stage segmentation for marketing strategy development. Westport: Quorum.Google Scholar
  47. Moschis, G. P. (2007). Life course perspectives on consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mynatt, E. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2001). Developing technology to support the functional independence of older adults. Ageing International, 27(1), 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Niemelä-Nyrhinen, J. (2007). Baby boom consumers and technology: shooting down stereotypes. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(5), 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Philips, L. W., & Sternthal, B. (1977). Age differences in information processing: a perspective on the aged consumer. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 444–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pirkl, J. J. (1994). Transgenerational design: Products for an aging population. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  52. Powell, J. L. (2010). The power of global aging. Ageing International, 35(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robinson, B. (1995). Technology and aging: a separate little world? Ageing International, 22(1), 54–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free.Google Scholar
  55. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: usual and successful. Science, 237(4811), 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Succesful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–440.Google Scholar
  57. Schmidt, G. M. (2004). Low-end and high-end encroachment strategies for new products. International Journal of Innovation Management, 8(2), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2005). Changes in product attributes and costs as drivers of new product diffusion and substitution. Production and Operations Management, 14(3), 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidt, G. M., & Druehl, C. T. (2008). When is a disruptive innovation disruptive? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sudbury, L., & Simcock, P. (2009). Understanding older consumers through cognitive age and the list of values: a U.K.-based perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 26(1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Suzuki, K., Mito, G., Kawamoto, H., Hasegawa, Y., & Sankai, Y. (2007). Intention-based walking support for paraplegia patients with robort suit HAL. Advanced Robotics, 21(12), 1441–1469.Google Scholar
  62. Tempest, S., Barnat, C., & Coupland, C. (2002). Grey advantage: new strategies for the old. Long Range Planning, 35(5), 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thompson, M. (1996). Computer technology: how it impacts the lives of older adults. Ageing International, 23(1), 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tielen, G. (1998). Integrating senior citizens into the information society. Ageing International, 24(2–3), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tsuno, N., & Homma, A. (2009). Ageing in Asia—the Japan experience. Ageing International, 34(1–2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Uhl, K., Andrus, R., & Poulsen, L. (1970). How are laggards different? An empirical inquiry. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(1), 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Utterback, J. M., & Acee, H. J. (2005). Disruptive technologies: an expanded view. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Living with seal robots—its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 972–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T., & Kimura, S. (2008). Robot therapy of elders affected by dementia. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 27(4), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wolfe, D. B., & Snyder, R. E. (2003). Ageless marketing: Strategies for reaching the hearts & minds of the new customer majority. Chicago: Dearborn.Google Scholar
  71. Wylde, M. A. (1995). How to size up the current and future markets: technologies and the older adult. Generations, 19(1), 15–19.Google Scholar
  72. Yin, R. K. (2003a). Applications of case study research (2nd ed., Vol. 34)). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Yin, R. K. (2003b). Case study research, design and methods (3rd ed., Vol. 5)). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2009). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x.Google Scholar
  75. Zeithaml, V., & Gilly, M. C. (1987). Characteristics affecting the acceptance of retailing technologies: a comparison of elderly and nonelderly consumers. Journal of Retailing, 63(1), 49–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Institute for Japanese Studies (DIJ) TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Division of Engineering & Technology Management (D-ETM), Faculty of EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations