Ageing International

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 11–26 | Cite as

Intimacy and autonomy, gender and ageing: Living apart together



To an increasing extent the ‘young old’ in Sweden are actors in the process of the differentiation of family forms. A distinctive contribution is the establishment of lasting intimate relationships that do not include a shared home, that is, an alternative to marriage and unmarried cohabitation usually covered by the concept of Living Apart Together (LAT-relationships). Living Apart Together can offer older divorcees, widows, and widowers a fulfilling intimate relationship but at the same time ensure the individual a significant degree of autonomy. The study shows that this is of particular importance to women, and that older women play a vital role in establishing and upholding LAT-relationships. By preserving her own household a woman may avoid the asymmetrical distribution of household labor and unequal demands of caring for a partner that she may have experienced in a previous marriage.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahron, C. R., & Rodgers, R. H. (1987). Divorced families: A multidisciplinary developmental view. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R., Blieszner, R., & Roberto, K. A. (2000). Families in the middle and later years: A review and critique of research in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62, 911–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blomberg, S., Edebalk, P. G., & Petersson, J. (2000). The withdrawal of the welfare state: Elderly care in Sweden in the 1990s. Nutritional Neuroscience, 3, 151–153.Google Scholar
  6. Borell, K. (2001). I stället för äktenskap: Åldrande och nya intimitetsformer. [Instead of marriage: Aging and new forms of intimacy.] Gerontologia, 15, 147–156.Google Scholar
  7. Borell, K., & Ghazanfareeon Karlsson, S. (2000). Ældre kærestefolk — hvert sit hjem. [Living apart together in old age.] Gerontologi og Samfund, 16, 85–87.Google Scholar
  8. Burch, T. K. (1990). Remarriage of older Canadians: Description and interpretation. Research on Aging, 12, 546–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brubaker, T. H. (1990). Families in later life: A burgeoning research area. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 52, 959–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bulcroft, K. A., & O’Connor, M. (1986). The importance of dating relationships on quality of life for older persons. Family Relations, 35, 397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulcroft, R. A., & Bulcroft, K. A. (1991). The nature and functions of dating in later life. Research on Aging, 13, 244–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carstensen, L. (1992). Social and Emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology & Aging, 7, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherlin, A. J. (1999). Public and private families: An introduction. Second ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Cherlin, A. J., & Furstenberg, F. (1986). The new American grandparent: A place in the family, a life apart. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Crosbie-Burnett, M., & Giles-Sims, J. (1991). Marital power in stepfather families: A test of normative resource theory. Journal of Family Psychology, 4, 484–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, C. B., Reid, J. D., & Melendez, M. (1989). Conflict in families and friendship of later life. Family Relations, 38, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldscheider, F. K. (1990). The aging of the gender revolution: What do we know and what do we need to know? Research on Aging, 12, 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hadenius, S., & Weibull, L. (2000). Massmedier: en bok om press, radio och TV. [Mass media: A book about press, radio and TV.] Stockholm: Bonnier.Google Scholar
  19. Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolutions at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, M. E. (1991). Commitment to personal relationships. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships (Vol. III, pp. 117–143). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, M. P., & Caughlin, J. P. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage & Family, 61, 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplan, L. (2001). A couplehood typology for spouses of institutionalized persons with Alzheimer’s Disease: Perception of “We” — “I”. Family Relations, 50, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Levin, I., & Trost, J. (1999). Living apart together. Community, Work and Family, 2, 279–294.Google Scholar
  25. Lopata, H. Z. (1996). Current widowhood: Myths and realities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Maccoby, E. E., & Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Steitz, J. A., & Welker, K. G. (1990). Remarriage in later life: A critique and review of the literature. Journal of Women & Aging, 2, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swedish Central Bureau of Statistics, (1968–2000). Befolkningsstatistik. [Population statistics.] Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  29. Swedish Central Bureau of Statistics, (1992a). Population and housing census 1990. Part 2: Population and cohabitation. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  30. Swedish Central Bureau of Statistics, (1992b). Befolkning och utbildning. [Population and education.] Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  31. Swedish Central Bureau of Statistics, (1992c). Befolkning och hälsa. [Population and health.] Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  32. Swedish National Board of Health & Welfare. (2000). Äldreuppdraget: Slutrapport. [Old age care: Final report.] Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  33. Talbott, M. M. (1998). Older widow’s attitudes towards men and remarriage. Journal of Ageing Studies, 12, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, G. (1995). I’m the eyes and she’s the arms: Changes in gender roles in advanced old age. In: S. Arber & J. Ginn (Eds.), Connecting gender & ageing: A sociological approach (pp. 98–113). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Winfield, F. E. (1985). Commuter marriage: Living together, apart. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WorkMid-Sweden UniversityÖstersundSweden

Personalised recommendations