Defining Behavior and its Relationship to the Science of Psychology
Even though the concept of behavior is central to modern psychology, there is no consensus regarding what the term behavior means. The current paper focuses on disentangling two separate conceptions of the term that have added to the confusion. One meaning of the term behavior pertains to natural scientific epistemology, specifically the requirements of empirical methodology and its reliance on data that are measurable and available to public observation. The second meaning pertains to ontology and relates to the fact that at a descriptive level there are different kinds of behavioral patterns in the universe. Put simply, inanimate material objects behave differently from living organisms, which behave differently from animals, which behave differently from people. This paper introduces a “Periodic Table of Behavior” derived from Henriques’, Review of General Psychology, 7, 150–182, (2003, 2011) Tree of Knowledge System to map the different kinds of behaviors that are described and examined by different sciences. It concludes by using the formulation to clarify the relationship between the methodological and ontological description of behavior and argues how the basic science of psychology can be effectively defined as the science of mental behavior going forward.
KeywordsBehavior Mind Ontology Definition of psychology Tree of knowledge system
- Ashby, W. R. (1952). Design for a brain. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Baars, B. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Bray, D. (2009). Wetware: A Computer in every Living Cell. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Cahoone, L. (2013). Orders of nature. New York: Stony Brook Press.Google Scholar
- Christian, D. (2018). Origin story: The big history of everything. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
- Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Publishing.Google Scholar
- Deacon, T. (2011). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter (p. 2011). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. New York: Penguin books.Google Scholar
- Ettinger, R. H. (2018). Essentials of psychology: The science of behavior. New York: BVT Publishing.Google Scholar
- Henriques, G. R., Michalski, J., Quackenbush, S., & Schmidt, W. (in press). The Tree of Knowledge System: A new map for Big History. Journal of Big History.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, S. A. (2019). A world beyond physics: The emergence and evolution of life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kirschner, S. (2019). The indispensable subject of psychology: Theory, subjectivity and the spectre of inner life. Book chapter in Re-envisioning theoretical and philosophical psychology (Ed. Thomas Teo), pp. 131–159.Google Scholar
- Kral, K., & Prete, F. (2004). In the mind of a hunter: The visual world of the praying mantis. In Prete (Ed). Complex Worlds from Simpler Nervous Systems. Chapter MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambala.Google Scholar
- Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason: A new theory of human understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Moore, J. (2011/2012). Methodological behaviorism as a radical behaviorist views it. Behavior and Philosophy, 39/40, 145–202.Google Scholar
- Myers, D., & DeWall, C. N. (2016). Exploring psychology (10th Ed.). New York: MacMillian Worth publishers.Google Scholar
- Ossorio, P. G. (2006). The behavior of persons. The collected works of Peter G. Ossorio, Vol. V. Ann Arbor: Descriptive Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Schrödinger, E. (1967/1944). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Siegfried, T. (2000). The bit and the pendulum: From quantum computing to M theory: The new physics of information. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
- Skinner Foundation (posted 2009). Video showing pigeons playing ping pong. Retrieved January 17, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGazyH6fQQ4.
- Stam, H. (2015). The neurosciences and the search for a unified psychology: The science and esthetics of a single framework. Frontiers in Psychology, Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01467, 6.
- Uher, J. (2013). Personality psychology: lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story-Why it is time for a paradigm shift. Integrative Psycholology and Behavioral Science, 47, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9230-6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wasserman, E. (2018). What’s next? American Psychological Association monitor. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/07-08/cover-next.aspx#wasserman. Accessed 7 Jan 2019.
- Wilber, K. (1995). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Boston: MA: Shambala.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Wolfson, R. (2013). Physics and our universe. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyTKyj9kpVk. Accessed 12 Feb 2019.