Advertisement

Press Ideology as an Epistemological Connector between Framing Theory and Social Representations Theory: An Analysis of Violence and Drug Trafficking in the Mexican Press

  • 126 Accesses

Abstract

The present paper explores the advantages of using framing theory, social representations theory and differences in ideology to analyze polarized issues in the press. Framing uncovers the structure/format of news articles and social representations explores their meanings. These two theoretical positions are connected through the concept of ideology – a set of beliefs that shape position taking regarding social issues. Using this integrated framework, we will analyze the highly polarized topic of violence and drug trafficking in two ideologically different newspapers in Sinaloa, Mexico - Noroeste (journalistic ideology) and El Debate (elite ideology) (total N = 547 articles). This will be accomplished using three steps – a descriptive analysis, application of the framing scale and submitting the articles to ALCESTE software. The results show differences in framing and social representations of violence and drug trafficking according to ideology. Each newspaper presented different news frames (journalistic - attribution of responsibility and conflict frames; elite - human-interest and morality frames). However, at the level of representations (content) there were ideological differences in the representation of violence but not of drug trafficking, suggesting a common element in these representations, beyond ideological differences. These findings contribute to (1) the clarification of the concept used and (2) towards an analytical framework of press analysis - analyzing format and content and considering differences in press ideology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    This newspaper has made two extensions of its own edition: La I and La Sirenita. These two newspapers are characterized by the publication of violent acts typical of drug trafficking. The harshness with which both newspapers present their images, accompanied by a discourse typical of popular jargon (see: http://www.pnmi.segob.gob.mx/).

  2. 2.

    Dejan mensaje firmados por Arturo Beltran Leyva.

  3. 3.

    “Organized crime owns the city: Aguirre Meza”.

  4. 4.

    “Fight against drug trafficking skyrockets crime”.

  5. 5.

    “Army vs Drug trafficking: A lost cause”.

  6. 6.

    Matan a 2 narcos a 3 madrinas de la PFJ de la colonia Guadalupe Victoria.

References

  1. Abric, J.C. (2001). Prácticas y Representaciones Sociales. México: Ediciones Coyoacan.

  2. Akhavan-Majid, R., & Ramaprasad, J. (1998). Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of U.S and Chinese newspaper coverage of the fourth United Nations conference on woman and the NGO forum. Mass Communication & Society, 1(3), 131–152.

  3. An, S. K., & Gower, K. K. (2009). How do the news media frame crises? A content analysis of crisis news coverage. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 107–112.

  4. Ardevol-Abreu, A. (2015). Framing countries in humanitarian crisis. A deductive content analysis of press news. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodistico, 21(2), 705–722.

  5. Ariño, A. (1997). Ideología, discursos y dominación. Revista Española de Investigación Sociológicas, 79, 197–220.

  6. Astorga, L. 2003, México, Colombia y las drogas ilegales. Variaciones sobre un mismo tema’, conferencia dictada en la VIII Cátedra Anual de Historia Ernesto Restrepo Tirado, Análisis histórico del narcotráfico en Colombia, Bogotá, 29 al 31 de octubre de 2003.

  7. Bailey, J., & Taylor, M. (2009). Evade, corrupt or confront? Organized crime and the state in Brazil and Mexico. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 1(2), 3–29.

  8. Banchs, M. A. (2000). Aproximaciones Procesuales y Estructurales al estudio de las Representaciones Sociales. Papers on Social Representations, 9, 3.1.3.15.

  9. Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39–51.

  10. Bauer, M. W. (2000). Science in the media as cultural indicator: Contextualizing surveys with media analysis. In M. Dierkes & C. Von Grote (Eds.), Between understanding and trust: The public, science and technology (pp. 157–178). Amsterdam: Routledge.

  11. Bell, D. (1965). The end of ideology: On the exhaustion of political ideas. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

  12. Ben-Asher, S. (2003). Hegemonic, emancipated and polemic social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 12, 6.1–6.12.

  13. Brambila, J. A. (2014). Comunicación en la guerra contra el narcotráfico. La estrategia publicitaria de la SEDENA (2007-2011). CONfines, 10(20), 9–33.

  14. Bravo, J. (2009). La comunicación gubernamental de Vicente Fox. El Cotidiano, 155, 43–55.

  15. Campbell, H., & Hansen, T. (2014). Is narco violence in Mexico terrorism? Bulletin of Latin American Research, 33(2), 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12145.

  16. Carreon, G. J., & De La Cruz, P. I. (2012). La lucha actual contra la delincuencia organizada en Mexico. Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias sociales, 14, 59–74.

  17. Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Lacus, S. (2016). First and second level agenda-setting in the twitter-sphere. An application to the Italian political debate. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2)159–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266.

  18. Cerrato, J., & Palmonari, A. (2007). Representaciones sociales y psicología social. Comportamientos, globalización y posmodernidad. Promolibro: España.

  19. Chiapello, E. (2003). Reconciling the two principal meanings of the notion of ideology: The example of the concept of the ‘spirit of capitalism’. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(2), 155–171.

  20. Cho, S. H., & Gower, K. K. (2006). Framing effect on the public’s response to crisis: Human frames and crisis type influencing responsibility and blame. Public Relations Review, 32(5), 420.422.

  21. Cobertta, P., Cavazza, N., & Roccato, M. (2009). Between ideology and social representations. Four theses plus (a new) one on the relevance and the meaning. European Journal of Political Research, 48(5), 622–641.

  22. Combate al narco dispara delitos. (2008, 25 diciembre). Noroeste, pp. 14.

  23. Cordova, N. (2011). La Narcocultura: Simbologia de la Transgresión, El poder y La muerte. Sinaloa leyenda negra. México: UAS.

  24. Correa-Cabrera, G. (2006). The spectacle of drug violence: American public discourse, media, and border enforcement in the Texas-Tamaulipas border region during drug war times. Norteamérica CISAN-UNAM, 7(2), 199–220.

  25. Crimen organizado dueño de la ciudad. (2008, 10 diciembre). Noroeste, pp. 9.

  26. Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper Collins.

  27. De Alba, M. (2004). El Método ALCESTE y su Aplicación al Estudio de las representaciones Sociales del Espacio Urbano: El Caso de la Ciudad de México. Papers on Social Representations, 13, 1.1–1.20.

  28. De Vreese, C. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.

  29. De Vreese, C., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A croos-national Comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322934.

  30. Doise, W., & Staerkle, C. (2002). From social to political psychology: The societal approach. In K. Monroe (Ed.), Political psychology (pp. 131–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  31. Doise, W. (2013). Social psychology and social change. Papers on Social Representations, 22, 7.1–7.22.

  32. Ejercito vs narcotrafico: causa perdida. (2000, 12 septiembre). Noroeste, pp. 2.

  33. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.

  34. Escalante, F. (2011). Homicidios 2008–2009: La muerte tiene permiso. Recuperado de: http://www.nexos.com.mx/?p=14089.ç. Accessed 1 Jan 2011.

  35. Farah, A. (2011). Attitudes and social representation. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1593–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.309.

  36. Gelado-Marcos, R. (2009). La dependencia de la prensa Española hacia las agencias de noticias. Comunicación y Sociedad, 23(2), 243–275.

  37. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

  38. Guimelli, C., & Rouquette, M. L. (2004). Etude de la relation d’antonymie entre deux objets de representation sociale: la securite vs. l’insecurite des biens et des personnes. Psychologie & Société, 4(1), 71–87.

  39. Hall, S. (1996). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. In D. Morley & K. H. Chen (Eds.), Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies (pp. 25–46). London: Routledge.

  40. Höijer, B. (2011). Social representations theory: A new theory for media research. Nordicom Review, 32(2), 3–16.

  41. Howarth, C. (2014). Connecting social representations, identity and ideology. Reflections on a London riot. Papers on Social Representations, 16(1), 1–18.

  42. Idoyaga, N., Valencia, J., Gil de Montes, L., & Ortiz, G. (2012). Efectos del Framing y representaciones sociales de epidemias sanitarias: El Caso de la Gripe A. Escritos de Psicología (Internet), 5(3), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.5231/psy.writ.2012.0211.

  43. Illia, L., Sonpar, K., & Bauer, M. W. (2014). Applying co-occurrence text analysis with ALCESTE to studies of impression management. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00842.x.

  44. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia. (2013). Defunciones por homicidio. México: INEGI. Recuperado de http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/olap/proyectos/bd/continuas/mortalidad/defuncioneshom.asp?s=est. Accessed 10 Mar 2013.

  45. Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsability for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992330.

  46. Knapp, E., Suárez, M. Y., & Mesa, M. (2003). Aspectos teóricos y epistemológicos de la categoría representación social. Revista Cubana de Psicología., 20, 23–34.

  47. Klein, O., & Licata, K. (2003). When group representations serve social change: The speeches of Patrice Lumumba during the Congolese decolonization. British Journal of Social Psychological, 42(4), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322595284.

  48. Lawson, C., & McCANN, J. (2004). Television news, Mexico’s 2000 elections and media effects in emerging democracies. British Journal of Political Sciences, 35, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00070123405000013.

  49. Lawson, C. (2000). Mexico’s unfinished transition: Democratization and authoritarian enclaves in Mexico. Mexican Studies, 16(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/1052198.

  50. Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 959–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x.

  51. Levin-Rozalis, M., Bar-On, N., & Hartaf, H. (2003). The structural process of the social representations of violence abusive men. Culture & Psychology, 9(4), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0394003.

  52. Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2011). Hegemonic and polemical beliefs: Culture and consumption in the social representation of wine. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 237–250.

  53. McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. (2001). The convergence of agenda-setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  54. Martinez, S. J. (2012). Suplicios, excesos y nota roja: elementos para pensar la violencia como acto significativo, tesis maestría. Ciudad de Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico.

  55. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279.

  56. Montoya, E. A. (2013). El periodismo y la sociabilidad política en el norte de Sinaloa: El Debate y sus vínculos con el poder político local durante los años cuarenta, tesis maestría. Culiacán, Sinaloa: Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa.

  57. Morales, C. (2011). La guerra contra el narcotrafico en Mexico. Debilidad del Estado, origen local y fracaso de una estrategia. Revista de ciencias sociales, 50, 1–35.

  58. Moscovici, S., & Duveen, G. (2000). Social representation. Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  59. Moscovici, S. (2001). Pourquoi l’etude des representations sociales en psychologie? Psychologie et Société, 4(4), 7–27.

  60. Muñiz, C., & Ramirez, J. (2015). Los empresarios frente al narcotrafico en Mexico. Tratamiento informativo de las reacciones empresariales ante situaciones de violencia e inseguridad. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 21(1), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2015.v21.n1.49104.

  61. Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  62. Nixon, B. (2011). The ideology of uncritical U. S. journalism: Its political-professional and political-economic roots. Medijska Istrazivanja, 17(1–2), 141–162.

  63. Paez, D. (1991). Pensamiento, individuo y sociedad. Cognición y representación social. Madrid: Editorial Fundamento.

  64. Pan, P. L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47(3), 630–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2010.02.002.

  65. Pardo, N. G. (2007). Niveles de organización del significado en el discurso. Discurso y Sociedad, 1, 85–115.

  66. Phail, E. M. (2010). Television y violencia. Revista Razón y Palabra, 73, 1–28.

  67. Rateau, P., Ernst-Vintila, A., & Delouvée, S. (2013). Una modelización del pensamineto social. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades., 23(1), 41–61.

  68. Reinert, M. (1996). Alceste (Version 3.0). Toulouse: Images.

  69. Reyes-Sosa, H. (2016). La relación entre el narcotráfico y la violencia en México: prácticas y discursos cotidianos, tesis doctoral. Donostia, San Sebastián: Universidad del País Vasco.

  70. Reyes-Sosa, H., Larrañaga-Egilegor, M., & Valencia-Garate, J. (2015). Dependencia representacional entre dos objetos sociales: el narcotráfico y la violencia. Revista Cultura y Representaciones Sociales, 9(18), 162–186.

  71. Rodelo, F. V. (2008). Ejercicio de libertad de prensa y sus limitaciones en entornos violentos. In El caso de los periodistas de Culiacán, Sinaloa, México, tesis maestría. Jalisco: Universidad de Guadalajara.

  72. Rouquette, M. L. (2009). La pensée sociale. Perspectivas fondamentales et recherches appliquées. Toulouse: Erés.

  73. Sádaba, T., Rodríguez-Virgili, J., & La-Porte, M. T. (2008). La teoría del framing en la investigación en comunicación política. In M. Canel & M. Gurrionero (Eds.), Estudios de comunicación política (pp. 15–30). España: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

  74. Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (2015). Social representations: A revolutionary paradigm? In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valisner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 3–11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  75. Sei-Hill, K., Scheufele, D., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Comunication Quarterly, 79(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900102.

  76. Semetko, H., & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.

  77. Thompson, J. B. (1993). Ideologia y cultura moderna. Mexico: UAM.

  78. Touri, M., & Koteyko, N. (2015). Using corpus linguistic software in the extraction of news frames: Towards a dynamic process of frame analysis in journalistic texts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 601–616.

  79. van Dijk, T. (2004). Discourse, knowledge and ideology: Reformulating old questions and proposing some new solutions. In M. Pütz, J. Neff-van Aertselaer, & T. van Dijk (Eds.), Communicating ideologies: Multidisciplinary perspectives on language, discourse and social practice (pp. 5–38). Frankfurt and Berlin: Peter Lang.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Hiram Reyes-Sosa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reyes-Sosa, H., Egilegor, M.L., Dos Santos, T. et al. Press Ideology as an Epistemological Connector between Framing Theory and Social Representations Theory: An Analysis of Violence and Drug Trafficking in the Mexican Press. Integr. psych. behav. 54, 179–195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09498-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Framing
  • Social representations
  • Ideology
  • Violence
  • Drug trafficking