Advertisement

Which Methodological Practice(s) for Psychotherapy Science? A Systematic Review and a Proposal

  • Omar Carlo Gioacchino GeloEmail author
  • Gloria Lagetto
  • Chiara Dinoi
  • Erika Belfiore
  • Elisa Lombi
  • Stefano Blasi
  • Massimo Aria
  • Enrico Ciavolino
Regular Article

Abstract

Three main methodological practices have been employed in psychotherapy science: the empirical-quantitative, empirical-qualitative, and theoretical one. Some scholars have argued for a monopoly of the empirical-quantitative methodological practice, sustained by scientific monism. This systematic review aims at exploring the contribution of each methodological practice to the field. Fifteen journals were searched from 2003 to 2013. A total of 9796 publications and 9915 studies met inclusion criteria and were coded for the methodological practice employed. Empirical-quantitative studies were the most published overall, over time, and in most of the journals considered. This overwhelming prevalence increased when considering the citation rates of the publications. We argue that these results are indicative of a quantitative monopoly, which in turn is due to a lack of critical thinking sustaining scientific monism. We call for disciplinary critical thinking and the consequent scientific pluralism valuing the plurality, diversity, and multiplicity of all the existing methodological practices.

Keywords

Psychotherapy science Methodological practice Research methods Scientific method Methodological pluralism Scientific pluralism Scientific monism Quantitative monopoly 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following SPR past presidents who replied to our survey: Lynne Angus, Lorna Smith Benjamin, Larry E. Beutler, Louis G. Castonguay, John Clarkin, Paul Crits-Christoph, Guillermo de la Parra, Irene Elkin, Robert Elliot, Marvin R. Goldfried, Leslie S. Greenberg, Alan S. Gurman, Clara E. Hill, Mardi J. Horowitz, Horst Kächele, Michael J. Lambert, Erhard Mergenthaler, David E. Orlinksy, William E. Piper, George Silberschatz, William B. Stiles, Bernhard Strauß, Jeanne Watson, Hadas Wiseman.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Omar C. G. Gelo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Gloria Lagetto declares that she has no conflict of interest. Chiara Dinoi declares that she has no conflict of interest. Erika Belfiore declares that she has no conflict of interest. Elisa Lombi declares that she has no conflict of interest. Stefano Blasi declares that she has no conflict of interest. Massimo Aria declares that she has no conflict of interest. Enrico Ciavolino declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Addis, M. E., & Waltz, J. (2006). Implicit and untested assumptions about the role of psychotherapy treatment manuals in evidence-based mental mealth practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(4), 421–424.  https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.4.421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreasen, N. C., Carpenter, W. T., Kane, J. M., Lasser, R. A., Marder, S. R., & Weinberger, D. R. (2005). Remission in schizophrenia: Propsed criteria and Raionale for consensus. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(3), 441–449.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271–285.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakan, D. (1966). Behaviorism and American urbanization. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(196601)2:1<5::AID-JHBS2300020103>3.0.CO;2-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker, C., Pistrang, N., & Elliott, R. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2004). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders. Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 205–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80036-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bassett, A. S., Scherer, S. W., & Brzustowicz, L. M. (2010). Copy number variations in schizophrenia: Critical review and new perspectives on concepts of genetics and disease. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(8), 899–914.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09071016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Beidas, R., & Kendall, P. (2010). Training therapists in evidence-based practice: A critical review of studies from a systems-contextual perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(1), 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.  https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bph077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braakmann, D. (2015). Historical paths in psychotherapy research. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 39–65).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caro Gabalda, I., & Stiles, W. B. (2013). Irregular assimilation progress: Reasons for setbacks in the context of linguistic therapy of evaluation. Psychotherapy Research, 23(1), 35–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.721938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Caspi, A., Hariri, A. R., Holmes, A., & Rudolf Uher, T. E. M. (2010). Genetic sensitivity to the environment: The case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(5), 509–527.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09101452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers, R. A., Taylor, J. R., & Potenza, M. N. (2003). Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. American Journal of Psychiartry, 160, 1041–1052.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charney, D. S. (2004). Psychobiological mechanism of resilience and vulnerability: Implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(2), 195–216.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chawla, N., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Experiential avoidance as a functional dimensional approach to psychopathology: An empirical review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(9), 871–890.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Coelho, H. F., Canter, P. H., & Ernst, E. (2007). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: Evaluating current evidence and informing future research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(6), 1000–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.1000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooper, M., & McLeod, J. (2007). A pluralistic framework for counselling and psychotherapy: Implications for research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7(3), 135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140701566282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costello, E., Mustillo, S., Erkanli, A., Keeler, G., & Angold, A. (2003). Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 837–844.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Crits-christoph, P., Gibbons, M. B. C., & Mukherjee, D. (2013). Psychotherapy process-outcome research. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 298–340). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Danziger, K. (1985). The methodological imperative in psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 15(1), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318501500101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Danziger, K. (1990). Deconstructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J. (2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking (pp. 705–725). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dunlop, B. W., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2007). The role of dopamine in the pathophysiology of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(3), 327–337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Elliott, R. (2010). Psychotherapy change process research: Realizing the promise. Psychotherapy Research, 20(2), 123–135.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300903470743.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Etkin, A., & Wager, T. D. (2007). Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: A meta-ana lysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(10), 1476–1488.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07030504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Feyerabend, P. K. (1981). Realism, rationalism and scientific method: Vol. 1. Philosophical papers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Flückiger, C., Grosse Holtforth, M., Znoj, H. J., Caspar, F., & Wampold, B. E. (2013). Is the relation between early post-session reports and treatment outcome an epiphenomenon of intake distress and early response? A multi-predictor analysis in outpatient psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 23(1), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.693773.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Frommer, J., & Rennie, D. L. (Eds.). (2001). Qualitative psychotherapy research: Methods and methodology. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Frommer, J., Langenbach, M., & Streeck, U. (2004). Qualitative psychotherapy research in German-speaking countries. Psychotherapy Research, 14(1), 57–75.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ptr/kph004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  32. Gao, Z. (2014). Methodologism/methodological imperative. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1176–1179).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gelo, O. C. G. (2012). On research methods and their philosophical assumptions: “Raising the consciousness of researchers” again. Psychotherapie & Sozialwissenschaft, 14(2), 111–130.Google Scholar
  34. Gelo, O. C. G., & Gallucci, M. (2016). Quantitative researchh. In H. L. Miller (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of theory in psychology (pp. 780–783). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Gelo, O.C.G., & Gelo, C. (2012). Dialogical relationship among scientific paradigms in psychotherapy research. In S. for P. R. (SPR) (Ed.), 3rd Joint Meeting of the European and the United Kingdom Chapters of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (p. 46). Ulm, Germany: Ulmer Textbank.Google Scholar
  36. Gelo, O. C. G., & Manzo, S. (2015). Quantitative approaches to treatment process, change process, and process-outcome research. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 247–277). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 42(3), 266–290.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2009). ERRATUM: Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(4), 406–407.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9107-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gelo, O.C.G, Auletta, A. F., & Braakmann, D. (2010). Aspetti teorico-metodologici e analisi dei dati nella ricerca in psicoterapia . Parte I: La ricerca sull’esito e la ricerca sul proces processo – dagli anni ’ 50 agli anni ’ 80 [Theoretical-methodological issues and data analysis in psychotherapy research. Ricerca in Psicoterapia/Research in Psychotherapy, 13(1), 61–91.Google Scholar
  40. Gelo, Omar C.G., Pritz, A., & Rieken, B. (Eds.). (2015). Psychotherapy Research: Foundations, Process and Outcome.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0.Google Scholar
  41. Gelso, C. J., Betz, N. E., Friedlander, M. L., Helms, J. E., Hill, C. E., Patton, M. J., Super, D. E., & Wampold, B. E. (1988). Research in counseling psychology: Prospects and recommendations. The Counseling Psychologist, 16(3), 385–406.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000088163006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 733–743.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310378184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gold, C. (2015). Quantitative psychotherapy outcome research: Methodological issues. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 537–558). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1998). Toward a more clinically valid approach to therapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.66.1.143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gone, J. P. (2009). A community-based treatment for native American historical trauma: Prospects for evidence-based practice. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 751–762.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(4), 636–645.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, P., Dufour, M. C., Compton, W., Pickering, R. P., & Kaplan, K. (2004). Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independentmood and anxiety disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and relatedconditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(8), 807–816.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.807.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Green, D., & Latchford, G. (2012). Maximising the benefits of psychotherapy: A practice-based evidence approach.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119967590.Google Scholar
  50. Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients’ care. The Lancet, 362(9391), 1225–1230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harris, K., Collinson, C., & das Nair, R. (2012). Service-users’ experiences of an early intervention in psychosis service: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 85(4), 456–469.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02043.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hasin, D. S., Stinson, F. S., Ogburn, E., & Grant, B. F. (2007). Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(7), 830–842.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.7.830.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Hill, C. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2004). Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy process and outcomes. In Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of sychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 84–135). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Hill, C. E., Nutt, E. A., & Jackson, S. (1994). Trends in psychotherapy process research: Samples, measures, researchers, and classic publications. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41(3), 364–377.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.3.364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hofmann, S., Sawyer, A., Witt, A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness- based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018555.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Hostetler, K. (1994). Community and neutrality in critical thought: A nonobjectivist view on the conduct and teaching of critical thinking. In K. S. Walters (Ed.), Re-thinking reason: New perspectives in critical thinking (pp. 135–154). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  60. Jasso, G. (1988). Principles of theoretical analysis. Sociological Theory, 6(1), 1.  https://doi.org/10.2307/201910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Joiner, T. E., Sheldon, K. M., Williams, G., & Pettit, J. (2006). The integration of self-determination principles and scientifically informed treatments is the next tier. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(3), 318–319.  https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kalivas, P. W., & Volkow, N. D. (2005). The neural basis of addiction:A pathology of motivation and choice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(8), 1403–1413.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Kapur, S. (2003). Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: A framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(1), 13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Karg, K., Burmeister, M., Shedden, K., & Sen, S. (2011). The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited: Evidence of genetic moderation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(5), 444–454.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.189.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Kazdin, A. E. (2009). Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 418–428.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802448899.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. E., & Waters, C. K. (Eds.). (2006). Scientific pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  67. Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(1), 4–12.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005a). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 593–602.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kessler, R. C., Wai, T. C., Demler, O., & Walters, E. E. (2005b). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 617–627.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Kessler, R. C., Adler, L., Barkley, R., Biederman, J., Conners, C. K., Demler, O., Faraone, S. V., Greenhill, L. L., Howes, M. J., Secnik, K., Spencer, T., Ustun, T. B., Walters, E. E., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(4), 716–723.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.163.4.716.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Kukla, A. (1982). Logical incoherence of value-free science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 1014–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kukla, A. (1989). Nonempirical issues in psychology. American Psychologist, 44(5), 785–794.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.5.785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kukla, A. (2001). Methods of theoretical psychology. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  74. Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Lambert, M. J. (Ed.). (2004). Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  76. Lambert, M. J. (Ed.). (2013a). Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  77. Lambert, M. J. (2013b). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 169–218). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Lambert, M. J. (2015). Outcome research: Methods for improving outcome in routine care. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 593–610). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  79. Lanius, R. A., Vermetten, E., Loewenstein, R. J., Brand, B., Christian, S., Bremner, J. D., & Spiegel, D. (2010). Emotion modulation in PTSD: Clinical and neurobiological evidence for a dissociative subtype. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(6), 640–647.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its progress. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  81. Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  82. Lilienfeld, S. O., Ritschel, L. A., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., & Latzman, R. D. (2013). Why many clinical psychologists are resistant to evidence-based practice: Root causes and constructive remedies. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(7), 883–900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Luppino, F. S., De Wit, L. M., Bouvy, P. F., Stijnen, T., Cuijpers, P., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Zitman, F. G. (2010). Overweight, obesity, and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 220–229.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lutz, W., Ehrlich, T., Rubel, J., Hallwachs, N., Röttger, M.-A., Jorasz, C., Mocanu, S., Vocks, S., Schulte, D., & Tschitsaz-Stucki, A. (2013). The ups and downs of psychotherapy: Sudden gains and sudden losses identified with session reports. Psychotherapy Research, 23(1), 14–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.693837.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Marder, S. R., Essock, S. M., Miller, A. L., Buchanan, R. W., Casey, D. E., Davis, J. M., Kane, J. M., Lieberman, J. A., Schooler, N. R., Covell, N., Stroup, S., Weissman, E. M., Wirshing, D. A., Hall, C. S., Pogach, L., Pi-Sunyer, X., Bigger, J. T., Jr., Friedman, A., Kleinberg, D., Yevich, S. J., Davis, B., & Shon, S. (2004). Physical health monitoring of patients with schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(8), 1334–1349.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. McLeod, J. (2011). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Merikangas, K. R., Akiskal, H. S., Angst, J., Greenberg, P. E., Hirschfeld, R. M., Petukhova, M., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of bipolar Spectrum disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(5), 543–552.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Miklowitz, D. J. (2008). Adjunctive psychotherapy for bipolar disorder: State of the evidence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 1408–1419.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08040488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Mörtl, K., & Gelo, O. C. G. (2015). Qualitative methods in psychotherapy process research. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 381–428). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  91. Najavits, L. M., & Hien, D. (2013). Helping vulnerable populations: A comprehensive review of the treatment outcome literature on substance use disorder and PTSD. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(5), 433–479.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Oddli, H. W., & Rønnestad, M. H. (2012). How experienced therapists introduce the technical aspects in the initial alliance formation: Powerful decision makers supporting clients’ agency. Psychotherapy Research, 22(2), 176–193.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.633280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Orlinsky, D. R., & Russell, R. L. (1994). Tradition and change in psychotherapy research. Notes on the fourth generation. In R. L. Russell (Ed.), Reassessing psychotherapy research (pp. 185–214). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  94. Orlinsky, D. E., Grawe, K., & Parks, B. K. (1994). Process and outcome in psychotherapy – Noch Einmal. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4th ed., pp. 270–376). New York: NY.Google Scholar
  95. Pacchiarotti, I., Bond, D. J., Baldessarini, R. J., Nolen, W. A., Grunze, H., Licht, R. W., Post, R. M., Berk, M., Goodwin, G. M., Sachs, G. S., Tondo, L., Findling, R. L., Youngstrom, E. A., Tohen, M., Undurraga, J., González-Pinto, A., Goldberg, J. F., Yildiz, A., Altshuler, L. L., Calabrese, J. R., Mitchell, P. B., Thase, M. E., Koukopoulos, A., Colom, F., Frye, M. A., Malhi, G. S., Fountoulakis, K. N., Vázquez, G., Perlis, R. H., Ketter, T. A., Cassidy, F., Akiskal, H., Azorin, J. M., Valentí, M., Mazzei, D. H., Lafer, B., Kato, T., Mazzarini, L., Martínez-Aran, A., Parker, G., Souery, D., Özerdem, A., McElroy, S. L., Girardi, P., Bauer, M., Yatham, L. N., Zarate, C. A., Nierenberg, A. A., Birmaher, B., Kanba, S., el-Mallakh, R. S., Serretti, A., Rihmer, Z., Young, A. H., Kotzalidis, G. D., MacQueen, G. M., Bowden, C. L., Ghaemi, S. N., Lopez-Jaramillo, C., Rybakowski, J., Ha, K., Perugi, G., Kasper, S., Amsterdam, J. D., Hirschfeld, R. M., Kapczinski, F., & Vieta, E. (2013). The international society for bipolar disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(11), 1249–1262.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13020185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Petrowski, K., Pokorny, D., Nowacki, K., & Buchheim, A. (2013). The therapist’s attachment representation and the patient’s attachment to the therapist. Psychotherapy Research, 23(1), 25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.717307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Phillips, J. C., Ingram, K. M., Smith, N. G., & Mindes, E. J. (2003). Methodological and content review of lesbian-, gay-, and bisexual-related articles in counseling journals: 1990-1999. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(1), 25–62.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000002239398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Phillips, M. L., Travis, M. J., Fagiolini, A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2008). Medication effects in neuroimaging studies of bipolar disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(3), 313–320.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07071066.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Pokorny, D. (2015). Quantitative data analysis in psychotherapy process research: Structures and procedures. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process and outcome (pp. 229–245). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  100. Polanczyk, G., De Lima, M. S., Horta, B. L., Biederman, J., & Rohde, L. A. (2007). The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: A systematic review and metaregression analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(6), 942–948.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.164.6.942.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  102. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1991). Two conflicting calls for methodological reform. The Counseling Psychologist, 19(1), 103–114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000091191008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Ponterotto, J. G. (2005a). Integrating qualitative research requirements into professional psychology training programs in North America: Rationale and curriculum model. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(2), 97–116.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp035oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Ponterotto, J. G. (2005b). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Raison, C. L., & Miller, A. H. (2003). When not enough is too much: The role of insufficient glucocorticoid signaling in the pathophysiology of stress-related disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(9), 1554–1565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Raison, C. L., Lowry, C. A., & Rook, G. A. W. (2010). Inflammation, sanitation, and consternation: Loss of contact with coevolved, tolerogenic microorganisms and the pathophysiology and treatment of major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(12), 1211–1224.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. Rennie, D. L. (2004). Anglo-north American qualitative counseling and psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 14(1), 37–55.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ptr/kph003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Rennie, D. L. (2012). Qualitative research as methodical hermeneutics. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 385–398.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Rennie, D. L., & Frommer, J. (2015). Applications of qualitative and mixed-methods counseling and psychotherapy research. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 429–454). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  111. Richardson, L. K., Frueh, B. C., Grubaugh, A. L., Egede, L., & Elhai, J. D. (2009). Current directions in videoconferencing tele-mental Health Research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 16(3), 323–338.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01170.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rieken, B., & Gelo, O. C. G. (2015). The philosophy of psychotherapy science: Mainstream and alternative views. Psychotherapy Research: Foundations, process, and outcome, 67–92. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  113. Rodgers, B., & Elliott, R. (2015). Qualitative methods in psychotherapy outcome research. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 559–578). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  114. Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (2005). What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  115. Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Stewart, J. W., Warden, D., et al. (2006). Acute and longer- term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR * D report. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(11), 1905–1917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Salvatore, S. (2011). Psychotherapy research needs theory: Outline for an epistemology of the clinical exchange. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 45(3), 366–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9180-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental for generalized designs causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  118. Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Shelton, K., & Delgado-Romero, E. A. (2011). Sexual orientation microaggressions: The experience of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer clients in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(2), 210–221.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Singh, A. A., & Shelton, K. (2011). A content analysis of LGBTQ qualitative research in counseling: A ten-year review. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(2), 217–226.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00080.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Slife, B. D. (1998). Raising the consciousness of researchers: Hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15(3), 208–221.  https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.15.3.208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Slife, B. D. (2004). Theoretical challenges to therapy practice and research: The constraint of naturalism. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  123. Slife, B. D., & Gantt, E. E. (1999). Methodological pluralism: A framework for psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(12), 1453–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199912)55:12<1453::AID-JCLP4>3.0.CO;2-C.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Slife, B. D., & Williams, R. N. (1995). What’s behind the research: Discovering the hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  125. Slife, B. D., & Williams, R. N. (1997). Toward a theoretical psychology: Should a subdiscipline be formally recognized? American Psychologist, 52(2), 117–129.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.52.2.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Slife, B. D., Wiggins, B. J., & Graham, J. T. (2005). Avoiding an EST monopoly: Toward a pluralism of philosophies and methods. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 35(1), 83–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-005-0805-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Smaling, A. (2000). What kind of dialogue should paradigm-dialogues be? Quality and Quantity, 34(1), 51–63.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004747524463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Stegenga, J. (2014). Down with the hierarchies. Topoi, 33(2), 313–322.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9189-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Stein, M. B., & McAllister, T. W. (2009). Exploring the convergence of posttraumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(7), 768–776.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08101604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Stiles, W. B. (2015). Theory building, enriching, and fact gathering: Alternative purposes of psychotherapy research. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 159–179). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  131. Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  132. Timulak, L. (2009). Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4–5), 591–600.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802477989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Trivedi, M. H., Rush, A. J., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Warden, D., Ritz, L., et al. (2006). Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: Implications for clinical practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(1), 28–40.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Weisz, J. R., Doss, A. J., & Hawley, K. M. (2005). Youth psychotherapy outcome research: A review and critique of the evidence base. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 337–363.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141449.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Westerman, M. A. (2006). Quantitative research as an interpretive enterprise: The mostly unacknowledged role of interpretation in research efforts and suggestions for explicitly interpretive quantitative investigations. New Ideas in Psychology, 24(3), 189–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). A qualitative investigation of problem gambling as an escape-based coping strategy. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80(1), 107–125.  https://doi.org/10.1348/147608306X107881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Yanchar, S. C., & Slife, B. D. (2004). Teaching critical thinking by examining assumptions. Teaching of Psychology, 31(2), 85–90.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3102_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Yanchar, S. C., Slife, B. D., & Warne, R. (2008). Critical thinking as disciplinary practice. Review of General Psychology, 12(3), 265–281.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.3.265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Zarate, C. A., Singh, J. B., Carlson, P. J., Brutsche, N. E., Ameli, R., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Charney, D. S., & Manji, H. K. (2006). A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(8), 856–864.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History, Social Sciences and Human StudiesLecceItaly
  2. 2.Faculty of Psychotherapy ScienceSigmund Freud University ViennaWienAustria
  3. 3.Department of Humanistic StudiesUniversity of Urbino Carlo BoUrbinoItaly
  4. 4.Department of Economics and StatisticsUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations