Human-Computer Interaction Problem in Learning: Could the Key Be Hidden Somewhere Between Social Interaction and Development of Tools?
Homo sapiens is not just a tool-using species, they also can invent and develop tools. This is the feature that distinguishes humans from other species. It is necessary to get rid of the perceptual dominance of the present state of the material to invent and develop a tool. It is based on a mental process: designing. So how was that possible? In this article, I propose an evolutionary hypothesis in response to this question: the referential triangle. Accordingly, the relationship that people establish with things is mentally indirect, but the relationship they establish with each other is mentally direct. The hypothesis claims that the mental solutions of people have naturally established with each other are also used to invent and develop tools. The latest and most interesting product of this mechanism is artificial intelligence. Because artificial intelligence also acts as an inorganic system. What distinguishes it from other machines in this context is its social behavior. Artificial intelligence can generate social signals. So can artificial intelligence be both a tool and a partner at the same time in the referential triangle established with the tools by the human? In other words, can children, for instance, socially interact with artificial intelligence, just as they do naturally with people around? The article draws attention to that this problem should be included in the cultural psychological research agenda.
KeywordsSocial interaction Human-computer interaction Referential triangle Cultural learning Human evolution Artificial intelligence
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson, M. Holquist, Eds. & V. W. Mc Gee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Barnard, A. (2014). Simgesel Düşüncenin Doğuşu [Genesis of Symbolic Thought] (M. Doğan, Trans.). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
- Barnard, C., et al. (Producers) & Jonze, S. (Director) (2013). Her [Motion Picture]. USA: Annapurna Pictures.Google Scholar
- Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2011). Evrimin Dört Boyutu: Yaşam Tarihinde Genetik, Epigenetik, Davranışsal ve Simgesel Değişimler [Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life] (M. Doğan, Trans.). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
- Kubrick, S. (Producer & Director) (1968). 2001: A Space Odyssey [Motion Picture]. UK, USA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), Stanley Kubrick Productions.Google Scholar
- Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(15), 9096–9101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (2018). Genlerimizden İbaret Değiliz: Biyoloji, İdeoloji ve İnsan Doğası [Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature] (G. K. Gevinç et al., Trans.). İstanbul: Yordam. (Original work published 1984).Google Scholar
- Liu, X., Somel, M., Tang, L., Yan, Z., Jiang, X., Guo, S., Yuan, Y., He, L., Oleksiak, A., Zhang, Y., Li, N., Hu, Y., Chen, W., Qiu, Z., Pääbo, S., & Khaitovich, P. (2012). Extension of cortical synaptic development distinguishes humans from chimpanzees and macaques. Genome Research, 22(4), 611–622.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Luria, A. R., & Vygotsky, L. S. (1992). Ape, primitive man, and child: Essays in the history of behaviour. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf (Original work published 1930).Google Scholar
- Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. R. (2006). Zihin Dil Toplum, Gerçek Dünyada Felsefe [Mind, Language And Society: Philosophy In The Real World] (A. Tural, Trans.). İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık. (Original work published 1998).Google Scholar
- Sennett, R. (2012). Beraber [Together] (İ. Özküralpli, Trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.Google Scholar
- Şerif, M. (1985). Toplumsal Kuralların Psikolojisi [The Psychology of Social Norms] (İ. Sandıkçıoğlu, Trans.). İstanbul: Alan Yayıncılık. (Original work published 1936).Google Scholar
- Tomasello, M. (2005). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Tomasello, M., Melis, A., Tennie, C., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: the interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 56, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum. (Original work published 1934).Google Scholar