Advertisement

Scientific Ethos and Foundations of Conscious Activity

  • Sergey B. KulikovEmail author
Regular Article

Abstract

Clarification of the scientific ethos provides the opportunity to reconstruct the foundations on which the conscious activity in science is based. Contemporary scientific society does not fully recognize this metaphysical issue because of the domination of the power of naturalistic argument. The ethos of science does not show its natural embodiment; it is the complex of social and psychological norms, which rules each scientist unconsciously. Embodiment of the scientific ethos in Wittgenstein and Husserl exhibits metatheoretical prerequisites for critique of the theory presented by Robert Merton. The phenomenological approach offered by Husserl helps to visualize the scientific ethos. The analytical approach developed by Wittgenstein allows enriching this procedure. Interaction of these approaches provides disclosure of scientific mind for representation of conscious activity within science. The author maintains four theses. I. The form of attributive proposition cannot express scientific ethos, thereby, scientific ethos cannot be actually universalistic. II. The scientific ethos demands disclosure of metaphysical perspective of understanding, and it cannot lead to ordinary social forms of interaction. III. The phenomenology of scientific ethos is a branch of metaphysical studies that presupposes the correspondence between personal experiences and extraordinary forms of communication. IV. Contradictions in the scientific ethos are necessary, and they demand the corresponding theory for the explanation. Thesis (I) opens a way to interpretation of a scientific ethos as the semi-formalized description of the bases of science. It discloses new way for psychological understanding of scientific activity. The science is a complex of propositions on the base of the extra-rational assumptions of the nature of knowledge. Thesis (II) discloses options of understanding of this nature. Theses (III) and (IV) provide investigations of a metaphysical origin of scientific knowledge, namely, irremovable contradictions and wisdom as elements of the general scientific ethos.

Keywords

Conscious activity Propositional attitudes Psychology of knowledge Social body of science Wittgenstein Husserl Merton 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/ or Animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ally, M. (2012). Ecologizing Sartre’s ontology: Nature, science, and dialectics. Environmental Philosophy, 9(2), 95–121.  https://doi.org/10.5840/envirophil20129217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alter, T., & Walter, S. (2007). Phenomenal concepts and phenomenal knowledge: New essays on consciousness and physicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. E. (1982). Speech imagery is not always faster than visual imagery. Memory and Cognition, 10(4), 371–380.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aristotle. 350BC/1928. The Works of Aristotle (Vol. VIII). Edited by W. Ross. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arroyo, C. 2009. The role of feelings in Husserl's ethics. Idealistic Studies 39(1/3): 11–22.  https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies2009391/310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baddeley, A. D., & Lewis, V. (1981). Inner active processing in Reading: The inner voice, the inner ear, and the inner eye. In A. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 107–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, L. R. (1995). Explaining attitudes: A practical approach to the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, N. (1983). Mental pictures and cognitive science. Philosophical Review, 93(4), 499–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, M. W. (2010). The life-world as moral world: Vindicating the life-world en route to a phenomenology of the virtues. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique, 6(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
  11. Bruzina, R. 2010. Husserl’s “naturalism” and genetic phenomenology. New Yearbook for Phenomenology & Phenomenology Philosophy 10(1): 91–125. 10/nyppp2010104.Google Scholar
  12. Burch, M. I. (2013). The existential sources of phenomenology: Heidegger on formal indication. European Journal of Philosophy, 21(2), 258–278.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2010.00446.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casement, W. (1988). Husserl and philosophy of history. History and Theory, 27(3), 229–240.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2504919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chalmers, D. (1993). Connectionism and compositionality: Why Fodor and Pylyshyn were wrong. Philosophical Psychology, 6(3), 305–319.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089308573094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen, A.-M. (2004). Wittgenstein and ethical norms: The question of ineffability visited and revisited. Florianópolis, 3(2), 121–134.Google Scholar
  16. Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 67–90.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2025900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins, A. 1987. The Nature of Mental Things. Notre dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Coltheart, V. (1999). Phonological codes in Reading comprehension, short-term memory, and memory for rapid visual sequences. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 181–225). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Conant, J. 1989. Must We Show What We Cannot Say? In R. Flemming, & M. Payne (eds.) The Senses of Stanley Cavell. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Crowell, S. (1995). Heidegger’s phenomenological decades. Management World, 28(4), 435–338.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dahlstrom, D. O. (1994). Heidegger's method: Philosophical concepts as formal indications. The Review of Metaphysics, 47(4), 775–795.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004250206794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davidson, D. (1974). Belief and the basis of meaning. Synthese, 27(3–4), 309–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00484597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guerrero, María C.M. de 2005. Inner speech – L2 : thinking words in a second language. New York: Springer science+business media, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Dennett, D. (1969). Content and consciousness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Devitt, M. 1996. Coming to Our Senses: A Naturalistic Program for Semantic Localism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dilthey, W. 1907/1954. The Essence of Philosophy. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  27. Doria, N. G. (2009). No more than conjectures: Popper and the ethics of scientific Enterprise. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(2), 116–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9086-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Field, H. (1978). Mental Representation. Erkenntnis, 13(1), 9–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flanagan, O. (1992). Consciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge, mass. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Geach, P. (1957). Mental acts: Their content and their objects. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  32. Glazebrook, T. 2000. Heidegger’s philosophy of science (perspectives in continental philosophy). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Heidegger, M. (1927/1967). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Husserl, E. (1900). Logische Untersuchungen (Bd. 1) [Logical Ivestigations. Vol. 1]. Leipzig: Verlag von Veit & Comp.Google Scholar
  35. Husserl, E. 1911/1987. Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft. [Philosophy as Rigorous Science]. In E. Husserl, Gesammelte Werke, Bd. XXV, 30–67. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  36. Husserl, E. (1931). Méditations cartésiennes. [Cartesian Meditations]. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
  37. Husserl, E. 1977. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführungin die reine Phänomenologie (Bd. 1). [ideas for a pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to pure phenomenology] the Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  38. Hutto, D. D. (2003). Wittgenstein and the end of philosophy: Neither theory nor therapy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson, F. (1982). Epiphenomenal Qualia. The Philosophical Quarterly, 32(127), 127–136.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2960077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnston, D. (2009). Propositions and propositional acts. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39(3), 435–462.  https://doi.org/10.1353/cjp.0.0056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Konopka, A. (2008). A renewal of Husserl’s critique of naturalism. Environmental Philosophy, 5(1), 37–59.  https://doi.org/10.5840/envirophil20085127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kremer, M. (2002). Mathematics and meaning in Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations, 25, 272–303.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9205.00175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kriegel, U. (2011). The sources of intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kripke, S. (1975). Outline of theory of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(19), 695–717.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2024634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kurtz, P. (1969). Phenomenology and naturalism. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 7(1), 74–77.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246113000027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Moran, D. (2008). Husserl’s transcendental philosophy and the critique of naturalism. Continental Philosophy Review, 41, 401–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-008-9088-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Papineau, D. (1987). Reality and representation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Peucker, H. (2008). From logic to the person: An introduction to Edmund Husserl's ethics. The Review of Metaphysics, 62(2), 307–325.Google Scholar
  50. Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  51. Popper, K. (1959/2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Pylyshyn, Z. (1979). The rate of ‘mental rotation’ of images: A test of a holistic analogue hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 7(1), 19–28.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196930.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ricœur, P. 1966/2014. The later Wittgenstein and the later Husserl on language. Études Ricœuriennes / Ricœur Studies 5(1): 28–48.  https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2014.245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sartre, J.-P. 1940. L'Imaginaire: Psychologie phénoménologique de l'imagination. [the imaginary: A phenomenological psychology of the imagination]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  55. Sartre, J.-P. 1943. L'Être et le néant: Essai d'ontologie phénoménologique. [Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology ]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  56. Searle, J.R. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Siewert, C. (1998). The significance of consciousness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sokolov, A. N. (1972). Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spengler, O. 1926. The Decline of the West. Translated by C. F. Atkinson. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  60. Tarski, A. (1944). The semantical concept of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4, 341–375.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wagner, H. (1972). Husserl and historicism. Social Research, 39(4), 696–719.Google Scholar
  63. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  64. Wittgenstein, L. 1953/1968. Philosophical Investigations (3d ed.). Translated by G. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tomsk State Pedagogical UniversityTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations