Towards Topological Mechanisms Underlying Experience Acquisition and Transmission in the Human Brain
Experience is a process of awareness and mastery of facts or events, gained through actual observation or second-hand knowledge. Recent findings reinforce the idea that a naturalized epistemological approach is needed to further advance our understanding of the nervous mechanisms underlying experience. This essay is an effort to build a coherent topological-based framework able to elucidate particular aspects of experience, e.g., how it is acquired by a single individual, transmitted to others and collectively stored in form of general ideas. Taking into account concepts from neuroscience, algebraic topology and Richard Avenarius’ philosophical analytical approach, we provide a scheme which is cast in an empirically testable fashion. In particular, we emphasize the foremost role of variants of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem, which tells us that, when a pair of opposite (antipodal) points on a sphere are mapped onto a single point in Euclidean space, the projection provides a description of both antipodal points. These antipodes stand for nervous functions and activities of the brain correlated with the mechanisms of acquisition and transmission of experience.
KeywordsMind Brain Borsuk-ulam theorem Sensation
The Authors would like to thank Chiara Russo Krauss and Thomas Feldges for commenting on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The Author Tozzi declares that he has no conflict of interest. The Author Peters declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the Authors.
- Avenarius, R. (1908). Kritik Der Reinen Erfahrung von Richard Avenarius. Lepzig: C.R. Reisland.Google Scholar
- Borsuk, M. (1933). Drei sätze über die n-dimensional euklidische sphäre. Fundamenta Mathematicae XX, 177–190.Google Scholar
- Borsuk, M. (1958-1959). Concerning the classification of topological spaces from the standpoint of the theory of retracts. Fundamenta Mathematicae XLVI, 177–190.Google Scholar
- Borsuk, M. (1969). Fundamental retracts and extensions of fundamental sequences. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 1, 55–85.Google Scholar
- Churchland, P. M. (2007). Neurophilosophy At Work. Cambridge Univ Pr. ISBN-10: 0521864720. ISBN-13: 978–0521864725.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Greenwood: Greenwood Press, Westpost, Conn.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The theory of affordance in the ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Gorgolewski, K. J., Lurie, D., Urchs, S., Kipping, J. A., Craddock, R. C., Milham, M. P., Margulies, D. S., & Smallwood, J. (2014). A correspondence between individual differences in the brain's intrinsic functional architecture and the content and form of self-generated thoughts. PloS One, 9(5), e97176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Grau, C., Ginhoux, R., Riera, A., Nguyen, T. L., Chauvat, H., Berg, M., Amengual, J. L., Pascual-Leone, A., & Ruffini, G. (2014). Conscious brain-to-brain communication in humans using non-invasive technologies. PloS One, 9(8), e105225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105225.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Heft, H. (1997). The relevance of Gibson’s ecological approach to perception for environment-behavior studies. In G. T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior, and design. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Hume, D. (1739–40). A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. Penguin Classics; New Ed edition (31 Oct. 1985).Google Scholar
- Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York and London: McGraw_Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
- Luce, R. D., D'Zmura, M., Hoffman, D., Iverson, G. J., Romney, A. K. (eds) (1995) Geometric representations of perceptual phenomena. Papers in honor of Tarow Indow on his 70th birthday. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Luneburg, R. K. (1947). Mathematical analysis of binocular vision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Marr D (1982) Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
- Matoušek, J. (2003). Using the Borsuk–ulam theorem. In Lectures on Topological Methods in Combinatorics and Geometry. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Mitroi-Symeonidis, F.-C. (2015). Convexity and sandwich theorems. European Journal of Research in Applied Sciences, 1, 9–11.Google Scholar
- Peters, J. F. (2014). Topology of digital images. Visual pattern discovery in proximity spaces. In Intelligent Systems Reference Library. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. R., Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer International. p. 425. ISBN 3–540–08307-3. You would agree, I think, that in our experience of the world everything comes to us through the senses [...].Google Scholar
- Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Roldán, É., Martínez, I. A., Parrondo, J. M. R., & Petrov, D. (2014). Universal features in the energetics of symmetry breaking. Nature Physics, 10(6), 457–461. doi: 10.1038/nphys2940.
- Russo Krauss, C. (2013). Il sistema dell'esperienza pura. Firenze: Le Càriti.Google Scholar
- Russo Krauss, C. (2015). L'empiriocriticismo di Richard Avenarius tra psicofisiologia e teoria della consocenza. In R. Avenarius (Ed.), Il concetto umano di mondo. Morcelliana: Brescia.Google Scholar
- Suppes, P. (2002). Representation and invariance of scientific structures. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publication.Google Scholar
- Tozzi, A., Fla, T., Peters, J. F. (2016). Building a minimum frustration framework for brain functions in long timescales. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 94(8), 702–716.Google Scholar
- Weeks, J. R. (2002). The shape of space (IInd ed.). New York-Basel: Marcel Dekker, inc..Google Scholar
- Weyl, H. (1982). Symmetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Whitehead, A. N. (1919). An enquiry concerning the principles of natural knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Whitehead, A. N., & Russell, B. (1910). Principia mathematica (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Zeeman, E. C. (1962). The topology of the brain and visual perception. In M. K. Fort Jr. (Ed.), Topology of 3-manifolds and related topics (pp. 240–256). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar