Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 453–461 | Cite as

From the Analysis of Verbal Data to the Analysis of Organizations: Organizing as a Dialogical Process

Regular Article

Abstract

The analysis of conversational turn-taking and its implications on time (the speaker cannot completely anticipate the future effects of her/his speech) and sociality (the speech is co-produced by the various speakers rather than by the speaking individual) can provide a useful basis to analyze complex organizing processes and collective action: the actor cannot completely anticipate the future effects of her/his acts and the act is co-produced by multiple actors. This translation from verbal to broader classes of interaction stresses the performativity of speeches, the importance of the situation, the role of semiotic mediations to make temporally and spatially distant “ghosts” present in the dialog, and the dissymmetrical relationship between successive conversational turns, due to temporal irreversibility.

Keywords

Collective action Organizing process Peirce Pragmatism Semiotic mediation Situation Turn-taking 

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. In J. O. Urmson (Ed.), The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. M. Holquist (ed), Austin: University of Texas Press, Slavic Series.Google Scholar
  3. Boje, D. M. (1991). The Storytelling Organization: a Study of Story Performance in an Office-Supply Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boje, D. M. (1995). Stories of the Storytelling Organization: a Postmodern Analysis of Disney as ’Tamara-Land’. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 997–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boje, D. M., Oswick, C., & Ford, J. D. (2004). Introduction to Special Topic Forum. Language and Organization: The Doing of Discourse. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 571–577.Google Scholar
  6. Delcambre, P. (2010). Written and Oral Communication in the Workplace—Deployment, Stabilized Forms of Interactions, and Workload: an Organizational Approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fairhurst, G. T. and Cooren, F. (2004). Organizational language in use: Interaction analysis, conversation analysis and speech acts schematic. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. and Putman, L. (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse, Sage Publication Ltd: 131–152.Google Scholar
  10. Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ingold, T. (2010). The Textility of Making. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marsico, G. and Valsiner, J. 2014. ’Mind the border! Experiencing the present and reconstructing the past through the boundaries.’ In R. Säljö, P. Linell, and Å. Mäkitalo (eds.), Memory practices and learning: Experiential, institutional, and sociocultural perspectives. [City: publisher].Google Scholar
  13. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society from the standpoint of a social behaviourist. C.W. Morris (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Peirce, C. S. (1998). The Essential Peirce, volume 2. Edited by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Peirce, Ch. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce, volume 1, ed. N. Houser and C. Kloesel (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Rabelais, F. (1546/1995). Le Tiers Livre. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
  17. Roth, W. M. (2014). Working Out the Interstitial and Syncopic Nature of the Human Psyche: On the Analysis of Verbal Data. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 48, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stigliani, I., & Ravasi, D. (2012). Organizing Thoughts and Connecting Brains: Material Practices and the Transition from Individual to Group-Level Prospective Sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1232–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. (2000). The Emergent Organization. Communication as its Site and Surface. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Tsoukas, H. (2009). A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Volosinov, V. N. (1926/1983). Discourse in life and discourse in poetry: Questions of sociological poetics, in Shukman, A. (ed.), Bakhtin school papers: Russian poetics in translation, trans. Richmond, J. Somerton: Old School House, 5–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Accounting and Control DepartmentEssec Business SchoolCergy-PontoiseFrance

Personalised recommendations