Tension Between the Theoretical Thinking and the Empirical Method: Is it an Inevitable Fate for Psychology?
- 186 Downloads
This paper will start from focusing on the limitations of quantitative approach in psychology from three viewpoints. First-- data collection, especially experiments and questionnaires as two major methods of quantitative approach. The second limitation is data aggregation, followed by the third-- statistical significance testing. After that, recent spread of qualitative approach as another option for one of psychological methods will be introduced and a controversy surrounding epistemology of qualitative approach will be also introduced. Finally, it will be discussed that accumulation of faithful descriptions on reality, especially from qualitative approach, would be needed for producing creative research.
KeywordsQuantitative approach Qualitative approach Methodology of psychology
I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Jaan Valsiner, Clark University, for his helpful comments on an earlier draft.
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, vol.1: Attachment. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
- Bridgeman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Condor, S. (2003). “The least doubtful promise for the future”?: The short history of Tajfel’s “sociopsychological” approach to laboratory experimentation. In J. Laszlo & W. Wagner (Eds.), Theories and controversies in societal psychology (pp. 153–179). Budapest: New Mandate.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Editors’ introduction. Qualitative Research, 1, 3–6.Google Scholar
- Gigerenzer, G., & Murray, D. J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oak: Sage.Google Scholar
- Morrison, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (Eds.). (1970). The significance test controversy: A reader. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Omi, Y. (1998). Some problems of studies using “scales”. In T. Sato (Ed.), Gendai no Esprit(372): Psychology for personality (pp. 221–227). Tokyo: Shibundo. in Japanese.Google Scholar
- Omi, Y. (2007). Some issues surrounding measurement. In Y. Watanabe (Ed.), Methodology of psychology (pp. 68–89). Tokyo: Asakura-shoten. in Japanese.Google Scholar
- Omi, Y., & Kawano, K. (1996). Criteria of convincedness: what do psychologists work? Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (Tokyo Metropolitan Univ.), 269, 31–45. in Japanese.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), Social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 69–121). London: Academic.Google Scholar
- Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Yamagishi, T. (1998). The structure of trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. in Japanese.Google Scholar