Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 248–252 | Cite as

Mediation and Causality at the Individual Level



Within a person-oriented research paradigm the focus is on individuals characterized by patterns of information that are regarded as indivisible wholes. It is then not sufficient to carry out standard variable-oriented mediation analysis. The procedure suggested by von Eye, Mun, and Mair (2009) for pattern-oriented mediation analysis is much better aligned to this person-oriented framework. An important new feature in their approach is that it can detect mediator configurations that prohibit predictor and outcome connections at a pattern level. Two extensions of their procedure are suggested, namely (1) the use of cluster analysis to arrive at the categories and (2) the use of other models for estimating the expected frequencies. It is pointed out that in their context a functional relations perspective might be more relevant than the standard causality perspective.


Person-oriented Causality Mediation Configural frequency analysis 


  1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator—mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boker, S. M. (2002). Consequences of continuity: The hunt for intrinsic properties within parameters of dynamics in psychological processes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(3), 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns, R. B., Elder, G. H., & Costello, E. J. (1996). Developmental science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kelso, J. A. (2000). Principles of dynamic pattern formation and change for a science of human behavior. In L. R. Bergman, R. B. Cairns, L.-G. Nilsson & L. Nystedt (Eds.), Developmental science and the holistic approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Krauth, J., & Lienert, G. A. (1982). Fundamentals and modifications of configural frequency analysis (CFA). Interdisciplinaria, 3, Issue 1.Google Scholar
  7. Magnusson, D. (1985). Implications of an interactional paradigm for research on human development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 8, 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on Psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.Google Scholar
  9. Russell, B. (1913). On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13, 1–26.Google Scholar
  10. Schneirla, T. C. (1952). A consideration of some conceptual trends in comparative psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 49(6), 559–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. von Eye, A., & Bergman, L. R. (2003). Research strategies in developmental psychopathology: Dimensional identity and the person-oriented approach. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 553–580.Google Scholar
  12. von Eye, A., Mun, E. Y., & Mair, P. (2009). What carries a mediation process? Configural analysis of mediation, Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 43, 3, p x.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations