Advertisement

Homophobia as a Boundary Phenomenon: The Dynamic Dance Between Different Tensions

  • Ana Flávia do Amaral Madureira
Article

Abstract

From the commentaries presented in this issue, the main goal of this reply is to improve the analysis of homophobia as a boundary phenomenon of affective meaning-making, a collective historical–cultural construction. According to dialectical philosophical tradition, the notion of tension of opposites united within the same whole is a central notion that assumes an important role in the studies of meaning-making processes (Josephs and Valsiner, Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1):68–83, 1998). Therefore, this paper intends to analyze homophobia issues from the dynamic dance between different tensions: (a) the tension between the general and the particular; (b) the tension between the HEIMWEH and the FERNWEH processes; and (c) the tension between stability and change. Presented in the conclusion are some suggestions for future approaches about homophobia that could be advanced within the general area of cultural psychology.

Keywords

Homophobia Symbolic boundaries Prejudices Affective meaning-making processes Cultural psychology Analysis of different tensions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wants to thank the National Committee for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq (Brazil) for the financial support of her Ph.D. studies, included the period that she was Visiting Student of the Psychology Department at Clark University in Worcester—MA (USA).

References

  1. Andersen, M. L. (2000). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Branco, A. U., & Madureira, A. F. A. (2004). Communication, affect and self-construction. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on the Dialogical Self, August, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (2005). A Dominação Masculina. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.Google Scholar
  4. Capezza, N. (2007). Homophobia and sexism: The pros and cons to an integrative approach. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9027-6.Google Scholar
  5. Conselho Federal de Psicologia (1999). Resolução CFP N o 1/99 de 23 de março de 1999. Estabelece normas de atuação para os psicólogos em relação à questão da orientação sexual.Google Scholar
  6. Conselho Nacional de Combate à Discriminação (2004). Brasil sem Homofobia: Programa de Combate à Violência e à Discriminação contra GLTB e de Promoção da Cidadania Homossexual. Brasília: Secretaria Especial dos Direitos Humanos da Presidência da República.Google Scholar
  7. DaMatta, R. (1987). A casa e a rua: Espaço, cidadania, mulher e morte no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara.Google Scholar
  8. Fone, B. (2000). Homophobia: A history. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1996). Microfísica do Poder. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.Google Scholar
  10. Gonçalves, M. M., & Machado, C. (2007). “Homophobia”: A dialogical-semiotic approach. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9034-7.Google Scholar
  11. González-Lopes, G. (2005). Erotic journeys: Mexican immigrants and their sex lives. California: University of California.Google Scholar
  12. Iborra, A. (2007). Dealing with homosexuality in a homophobic culture: A self-organization approach. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9030-y.Google Scholar
  13. Joerchel, A. C. (2007). A dance between the general and the specific: Implications for the self concept. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9031-x.Google Scholar
  14. Josephs, I. E. (2007). The semiotic regulation of sexuality from a microgenetic perspective. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9028-5.Google Scholar
  15. Josephs, I. E., & Valsiner, J. (1998). How does autodialogue work? Miracles of meaning maintenance and circumvention strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1), 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, S. (2007). Gatekeeping and homophobia: From bouncers in bars to the macro-social, interpersonal, and intrapsychological practices of homophobia. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9029-4.Google Scholar
  17. Kullasepp, K. (2007). Affective guidance of sexual identity construction: Intra psychological level in the service of culture. Integrative Psychological & Behaviorial Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9026-7.Google Scholar
  18. Madureira, A. F. A. (2000). A construção das identidades sexuais não-hegemônicas: gênero, linguagem e constituição da subjetividade. Dissertação de Mestrado, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.Google Scholar
  19. Madureira, A. F. A. (2007). The psychological basis of homophobia: Cultural construction of a barrier. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9024-9.Google Scholar
  20. Morioka, M. (2007). The possibility of a fuzzy zone of semiotic activity. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9025-8.Google Scholar
  21. Parker, R. (1991). Corpos, Prazeres e Paixões: A Cultura Sexual no Brasil Contemporâneo. São Paulo: Editora Best Seller.Google Scholar
  22. Rasmussen, S. J. (2007). Boundaries, exclusion, and oppression in “the psychological basis of homophobia”: Cultural construction of a barrier. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9023-x.Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, N. (2001). Anti-discriminatory Practice. England: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  24. Valsiner, J. (1989). Human development and culture: The social nature of personality and its study. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  25. Valsiner, J. (1994). Bidirectional cultural transmission and constructive sociogenesis. In W. de Graaf & R. Maier (eds.), Sociogenesis Reexamined (pp. 47–70). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Valsiner, J. (2003). Sensuality and sense: Cultural construction of the human nature. Human Affairs, 13, 151–162.Google Scholar
  27. Valsiner, J. (2005). Affektive Entwicklung im kulturellen Kontext [Affective Development in Cultural Context]. In J. B. Asendorpf (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Soziale, emotionale und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung (Vol. 3, pp. 677–728). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  28. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations