Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 343–365 | Cite as

Government oversight, union democracy, and labor racketeering: Lessons from the teamsters experience

  • Michael H. Belzer
  • Richard Hurd
Symposium Union Money, Political Action, and Government Regulation


Organize Crime Labor Movement National Union Election Rule Election Officer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aronowitz, Stanley. “Democracy is Key.” New Labor Forum 3 (Fall/Winter 1998): 82–93.Google Scholar
  2. Bearth, Daniel P. “Hoffa Takeover Delayed by Leedham Protest.” Transport Topics. Alexandria, Va., January 18, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Beizer, Michael H. Collective Bargaining in the Trucking Industry: The Effects of Institutional and Economic Restructuring. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. —. “The Motor Carrier Industry: Truckers and Teamsters Under Siege.” In Contemporary Collective Bargaining in the Private Sector, edited by Paula B. Voos. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1994, pp. 259–302.Google Scholar
  5. —. “Collective Bargaining After Deregulation: Do the Teamsters Still Count?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48 (July 1995): 636–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bureau of National Affairs. “Dissident Teamsters Group Seeks to Intervene in Government’s RICO Case Against International.” Daily Labor Report, January 25, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. Carberry, Charles M. “Investigations Officer’s Report.” Washington D.C.: Independent Review Board, Office of the Chief Investigator, July 22, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Cherkasky, Michael G. “Decision in In re: Carey Slate (Post-47-EOH).” Washington D.C.: Office of the Election Officer for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, April 27, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Conboy, Kenneth. “Decision In Re Cheatem et al. (Post-27-EOH, Post-29-EOH, Post-31-EOH, Post-32-EOH, Post-33-EOH, Post-35-EOH, Post-37-EOH, Post-39-EOH, Post-40-EOH, Post-42-EOH, Post-43-EOH, Post-44-EOH, Post-51-EOH).” Washington, D.C.: Office of the Election Officer for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, November 17, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Crowe, Kenneth C. Collision: How the Rank and File Took Back the Teamsters. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. ---. “Charges Mar Hoffa Win.” Newsday, December 6. 1998.Google Scholar
  12. Dine, Phil. “Democracy Has Left Teamsters Leaderless and Bleeding, Badly.” St. Louis Post Dispatch, October 25, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Fletcher, Bill, Jr. and Richard W. Hurd. “Beyond the Organizing Model: The Transformation Process in Local Unions.” In Organizing to Win, edited by Kate Bronfenbrenner et. al. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998, pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, Steven. “Is Democracy Good for Unions?” Dissent 45 (Summer 1998): 33–39.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, Allen and Ted Schwarz. Power and Greed: Inside the Teamsters Empire of Corruption. New York: Franklin Watts, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. Garnel, Donald. The Rise of Teamster Power in the West. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. Geoghegan, Thomas. “Union Suit: A Wrong Cure for the Teamsters.” New Republic, August 22, 1988, p. 8.Google Scholar
  18. —. Which Side Are You On? Trying To Be for Labor When It's Flat on Its Back. New York: Penguin Books USA, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Goldberg, Michael J. “The Teamsters’ Board of Monitors: An Experiment in Union Reform Litigation.” Labor History 30 (Fall 1989a): 563–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ---. “Cleaning Labor’s House: Institutional Reform Litigation in the Labor Movement.” Duke Law Journal (September 1989b): 903–1011.Google Scholar
  21. Gould, William B. IV. Agenda for Reform: The Future of Employment Relationships and the Law. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  22. Greenhouse, Steven. “Once-Corrupt Teamster Local Has First Election in a Decade.” New York Times, December 20, 1998a.Google Scholar
  23. ---. “A Third Hoffa Vice President Faces Charges.” New York Times, December 18, 1998b.Google Scholar
  24. Gregory, Charles O. and Harold A. Katz. Labor and the Law. New York: Norton, 1979.Google Scholar
  25. Herberg, Will. “Bureaucracy and Democracy in Labor Unions.” Antioch Review 3 (Fall 1943): 405–17.Google Scholar
  26. Independent Review Board. “Independent Review Board's Five-Year Report (1992–1997) To Honorable David N. Edelstein, United States District Judge.” Washington, D.C.: Independent Review Board of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, November 6, 1997.Google Scholar
  27. James, Ralph and Estelle Dinerstein James. Hoffa and the Teamsters: A Study of Union Power. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1965.Google Scholar
  28. Kotier, Robert. “Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail.” Harvard Business Review 13 (March–April 1995): 59–67.Google Scholar
  29. Leiter, Robert D. The Teamsters Union: A Study of Its Economic Impact. New York: Bookman Associates, 1957.Google Scholar
  30. McClure, Laura. “The New Teamsters: Ron Carey and the Reformers One Year Later.” Dollars & Sense 10 (1993): 22.Google Scholar
  31. Methvin, Eugene H. “The Liberation of the Teamsters: End of Organized Crime Influence on Labor Unions.” National Review 44 (March 30, 1992): 35.Google Scholar
  32. Moody, Kim. “The Business Union Shortcut: When Will We Learn?” Labor Notes 226 (January 1998): 11.Google Scholar
  33. Muehlenkamp, Robert. “Organizing Never Stops.” Labor Research Review 17 (1991): 1–5.Google Scholar
  34. Neff, James. Mobbed Up: Jackie Presser’s High-Wire Life in the Teamsters, the Mafia, and the F.B.I. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  35. Paff, Ken. “Let the Teamsters Vote: We Need Union Democracy, Not a Government Takeover.” Washington Post, June 21, 1987.Google Scholar
  36. President's Commission on Organized Crime. “In the Matter of Roy L. Williams, a Witness Subpoenaed by the President's Commission on Organized Crime.” In The Edge: Organized Crime, Business, and Labor Unions — Appendix. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985.Google Scholar
  37. Quindel, Barbara Zack. “Decision of Election Officer in In re: Jeraldine Cheatem, et al. (Post-27-EOH, Post-29-EOH, Post-31-EOH, Post-32-EOH, Post-33-EOH, Post-35-EOH, Post-37-EOH, Post-39-EOH, Post-40-EOH, Post-42-EOH, Post-43-EOH, Post-44-EOH, Post-51-EOH).” Washington, D.C.: Office of the Election Officer for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 1997.Google Scholar
  38. Roberts, William. “Hoffa Failed to Win over Union’s Soul.” Washington, D.C.: Journal of Commerce, December 14, 1998, p. 1A.Google Scholar
  39. Romer, Sam. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters: Its Government and Structure. New York: John Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar
  40. Schulz, John D. “Back to the Future’ Teamsters’ Campaign Conflicts with Present Trucking Realities.” Traffic World, September 4, 1995.Google Scholar
  41. Sloane, Arthur A. Hoffa. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  42. Strauss, George. “Union Democracy.” In The State of the Unions, edited by George Strauss, Daniel G. Gallagher, and Jack Fiorito. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1991.Google Scholar
  43. United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE) (SDNY).Google Scholar
  44. Witt, Matt and Rand Wilson. “The Teamsters’ UPS Strike of 1997: Building a New Labor Movement.” Labor Studies Journal 24 (Spring 1999): forthcoming.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael H. Belzer
    • 1
  • Richard Hurd
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn Arbor
  2. 2.Cornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations