Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 571–587 | Cite as

Affirmative action, political representation, unions, and female police employment

  • Tim R. Sass
  • Jennifer L. Troyer
Articles

Abstract

Using data from three time periods (1981, 1987, and 1990/91), we analyze the factors that affect the hiring of female officers by municipal police departments. We find that affirmative action litigation significantly increased hiring of new female recruits, but female political representation in the form of female city councilors or mayors did not significantly affect the gender composition of police recruits. Consistent with co-worker discrimination, we find that hiring of female recruits is negatively related to the proportion of males already employed in the department. Furthermore, maledominated departments are more likely to employ fitness exams for recruits (a potential barrier to women) than are more integrated departments. The effect of a police union is mixed; there is some evidence that unions boost the hiring of female officers, yet unions are also associated with an increased likelihood of using fitness exams to screen new recruits.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baron, James N. “Organizational Evidence of Ascription in Labor Markets.” In Richard R. Cornwall and PhanindraV. Wunnava, ed. New Approaches to Economic and Social Analyses of Discrimination. New York: Praeger, 1991, pp. 113–43.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Gary S. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  3. —. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, Francine D. and Marianne A. Ferber. “Career Plans and Expectations of Young Women and Men: The Earnings Gap and Labor Force Participation.” NBER Working Paper no. 3445, National Bureau of Economic Research (September 1990).Google Scholar
  5. —. “Occupations and Earnings of Women Workers,” In Karen Shallcross Koziara, Michael H. Moskow, and Lucretia Dewey Tanner, ed. Working Women: Past, Present, Future. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, 1987, pp. 37–68.Google Scholar
  6. Borjas, George J. “The Politics of Employment Discrimination in the Federal Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law and Economics 25 (October 1982): 271–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burks, Edward C. “A Study of Patrols Finds Policewomen As Capable As Men.” New York Times, December 4, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. Charles, Michael T. “Women in Policing: The Physical Aspect,” Journal of Police Science and Administration 10 (June 1982): 194–205.Google Scholar
  9. Colker, Ruth. “Rank-Order Physical Abilities Selection Devices for Traditionally Male Occupations As Gender-Based Employment Discrimination.” U.C. Davis Law Review 19 (Summer 1986): 761–805.Google Scholar
  10. Fiorino, Susan J. “Nontraditional Occupational Aspirations and Attainment of Potential Female Recruits.” Feminist Issues 14 (Fall 1994): 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Firestone, Juanita M. “Occupational Segregation: Comparing the Civilian and Military Work Force.” Armed Forces & Society 18 (Spring 1992): 363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gely, Rafael and Timothy D. Chandler. “Protective Service Unions' Political Activities and Departmental Expenditures.” Journal of Labor Research 16 (Spring 1995): 171–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldin, Claudia. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. Groshen, Erica. “The Structure of the Female/Male Wage Differential.” Journal of Human Resources 26 (Summer 1991): 457–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hannan, Timothy and Orley Ashenfelter. “Sex Discrimination and Product Market Competition: The Case of the Banking Industry.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101 (February 1986): 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. King, Mary C. “Occupational Segregation by Race and Sex, 1940–88.” Monthly Labor Review 115 (April 1992): 30–36.Google Scholar
  17. Leonard, Jonathan S. “Wage Disparities and Affirmative Action in the 198O’s.” American Economic Review 86 (May 1996): 285–89.Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, Gregory B. and David Nice. “Race, Sex, and Occupational Segregation in State and Local Governments.” American Review of Public Administration 24 (December 1994): 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lott, John R., Jr. “Does a Helping Hand Put Others at Risk?: Affirmative Action, Police Departments, and Crime,” unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago Law School (October 1997).Google Scholar
  20. Mehay, Stephen L. and Rodolfo A. Gonzalez. “District Elections and the Power of Municipal Employee Unions.” Journal of Labor Research 15 (Fall 1994): 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. O'Brien, Kevin M. “The Impact of Union Political Activities on Public-Sector Pay, Employment, and Budgets.” Industrial Relations 33 (July 1994): 322–45.Google Scholar
  22. O'Connell, Lenahan, Michael Betz, and Suzanne Kurth. “Plans for Balancing Work and Family Life: Do Women Pursuing Nontraditional and Traditional Occupations Differ?” Sex Roles 20 (January 1989): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peltzman, Sam. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19 (August 1976): 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Riccucci, Norma M. Women, Minorities, and Unions in the Public Sector. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  25. Schultz, Theodore W. “Investment in Human Capital.” American Economic Review 51 (March 1961): 1–17.Google Scholar
  26. Spriggs, William E. and Rhonda M. Williams. “A Logit Decomposition Analysis of Occupational Segregation: Results for the 1970s and 1980s.” Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (May 1996): 348–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Treiman, Donald J. and Heidi Hartmann. Women, Work, and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  28. Trejo, Stephen J. “Public Sector Unions and Municipal Employment.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45 (October 1991): 166–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. White, Halbert. “A Heteroscedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity.” Econometrica 48 (May 1980): 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Winters, Clyde Ahmad. “Affirmative Action and Chicago Female Police.” Police Journal 62 (April 1989): 136–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim R. Sass
    • 1
  • Jennifer L. Troyer
    • 2
  1. 1.Florida State UniversityTallahassee
  2. 2.University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Personalised recommendations