Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 173–187

The effect of labor relations climate on the union participation process

  • J. Bryan Fuller
  • Kim Hester
Article

Abstract

Research examining union member attitudes and behaviors have produced inconsistent results for key relationships in models of union participation. Social information processing theory suggests that a contextual variable, labor relations climate, should systematically influence the attitudinal variables in these models. Our meta-analysis shows that labor relations climate moderates four of five key relationships. Consequently, theory on union member participation should be altered to reflect the recent emergence of less adversarial union-management relationships.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angle, Harold L., and James L. Perry. “Dual Commitment and Labor-Management Relationship Climates”. Academy of Management Journal 29 (March 1986): 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barling, Julian, Clive Fullagar, and E. Kevin Kelloway. The Union and Its Members: A Psychological Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Bies, Robert J., and J.S. Moag. “Interactional Justice: Communications Criteria of Fairness”. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, and M.H. Bazerman, eds. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, vol. 1. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1986: 43–55.Google Scholar
  4. Carson, Kenneth P., Chester A. Schriesheim, and Angela J. Kinicki. “The Usefulness of the ‘Fail-Safe’ Statistic in Meta-Analysis”. Educational and Psychological Measurement 50 (Summer 1990): 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, Paul F. “Determinants of the Quality of Union-Management Relations: An Exploratory Study of Union Member Perceptions”. Journal of Collective Negotiations 18 (1989): 103–15.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, Aaron. “Attitudinal Militancy and Propensity to Strike among Unionized Engineers and X-Ray Technicians”. Human Relations 45 (December 1992): 1333–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. —. “An Empirical Assessment of the Multidimensionality of Union Participation”. Journal of Management 19 (Winter 1993): 749–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conlon, Edward J., and Daniel G. Gallagher. “Commitment to Employer and Union: Effects of Membership Status”. Academy of Management Journal 30 (March 1987): 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deery, Stephen J., Roderick D. Iverson, and Peter J. Erwin. “Predicting Organizational and Union Commitment: The Effect of Industrial Relations Climate”. British Journal of Industrial Relations 32 (December 1994): 581–97.Google Scholar
  10. Festinger, Leon A. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1957.Google Scholar
  11. Fiorito, Jack. “Political Instrumentality Perceptions and Desire for Union Representation”. Journal of Labor Research 8 (Summer 1987): 272–89.Google Scholar
  12. —, Daniel G. Gallagher, and Charles R. Greer. “Determinants of Unionism: A Review of the Literature”. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 4 (1986): 269–306.Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, Richard B. “Job Satisfaction As an Economic Variable”. American Economic Review 68 (May 1978): 135–41.Google Scholar
  14. —, and James L. Medoff. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. Fukami, Cynthia V., and Erik Larson. “The Relationship between Union Commitment and Organizational Commitment: Dual Loyalty Reexamined”. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. —. “Commitment to Company and Union: Parallel Models”. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (August 1984): 367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fullagar, Clive, and Julian Barling. “Toward a Model of Union Commitment”. In D. Lewin, D.B. Lipsky, and D. Sockell, eds. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1987, pp. 43–78.Google Scholar
  18. —. “A Longitudinal Test of a Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Union Loyalty”. Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (April 1989): 213–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. —. “Predictors and Outcomes of Different Patterns of Organizational and Union Loyalty”. Journal of Occupational Psychology 64 (June, 1991): 129–43.Google Scholar
  20. —, Daniel G. Gallagher, Michael E. Gordon, and Paul F. Clark. “Impact of Early Socialization on Union Commitment and Participation: A Longitudinal Study”. Journal of Applied Psychology 80 (February 1995): 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuller, J. Bryan, Kim Hester, Pat Dickson, Barbara J. Allison, and Meg Birdseye. “A Closer Look at Cognitive Precursors to Organizational Turnover: What Has Been Missed and Why”. Psychological Reports 78 (June 1996): 1311–52.Google Scholar
  22. Gallagher, Daniel G. “The Relationship between Organizational and Union Commitment among Federal Government Employees”. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 1984, pp. 319-23.Google Scholar
  23. —, and Paul F. Clark. “Research on Union Commitment: Implications For Labor”. Labor Studies Journal 14 (Spring 1989): 52–71.Google Scholar
  24. ---, Jack Fiorito, Paul Jarley, Yeon-Ang Jeong, and Mitsuru Wakabayashi. “Dual Commitment in Japan: Preliminary Observations”. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, 1988.Google Scholar
  25. —, and George Strauss. “Union Membership Attitudes and Participation”. In G. Strauss, D. Gallagher, and J. Fiorito, eds. The State of Unions. Madison, Wisc: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1991, pp. 139–74.Google Scholar
  26. Gordon, Michael E., and Robert T. Ladd. “Dual Allegiance: Renewal, Reconsideration, and Recantation”. Personnel Psychology 43 (Spring 1990): 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. —, John W. Philpot, Robert E. Burt, Cynthia A. Thompson, and William E. Spiller. “Commitment to the Union: Development of a Measure and an Examination of Its Correlates”. Journal of Applied Psychology 65 (August 1980): 479–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunter, John E., and Frank L. Schmidt. Methods of Meta-analysis. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
  29. Joseph, M.I., and B. Dharmangadan. “Union Commitment among White Collar Employees: An Examination of Certain Correlates”. Psychological Studies 32 (July 1987): 104–10.Google Scholar
  30. Kelloway, E. Kevin, and Julian Barling. “Members' Participation in Local Union Activities: Measurement, Prediction, and Replication”. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (April 1993): 262–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kryl, Iona P. “Causal Modeling of Predictors and Outcomes of Trade Union Participation”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 1990.Google Scholar
  32. Magenau, John M., James E. Martin, and Melanie M. Peterson. “Dual and Unilateral Commitment among Stewards and Rank- and-File Union Members”. Academy of Management Journal 31 (June 1988): 359–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mathieu, John E., and Dennis M. Zajac. “A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment”. Psychological Bulletin 108 (1990): 171–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClendon, John A., and Brian Klass. “Determinants of Strike-Related Militancy: An Analysis of a University Faculty Strike”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 46 (April 1993): 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McShane, Steven L. “A Male-Female Comparison of Participation in a Local Labour Union”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich., 1983.Google Scholar
  36. Mellor, Steven, John E. Mathieu, and Janet K. Swim. “Cross-Level Analysis of the Influence of Local Union Structure on Women's and Men’s Union Commitment”. Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (April 1994): 203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, David G., and William N. Cooke. “US Labour Relations inTransition: Emerging Strategies and Company Performance”. British Journal of Industrial Relations 31 (December 1993): 531–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newton, Lucy A., and Lynn M. Shore. “A Model of Union Membership: Instrumentality, Commitment, and Opposition”. Academy of Management Review 17 (March 1992): 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olson, James M., and Mark P. Zanna. “Attitudes and Attitude Change”. Annual Review of Psychology 44 (1993): 117–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Osburn, H.G., and John Callender. “A Note on the Sampling Variance of the Mean Uncorrected Correlation in Meta-Analysis and Validity Generalization”. Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (April 1992): 115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reed, Celeste S., Willard R. Young, and Patrick P. McHugh. “A Comparative Look at Dual Commitment: An International Study”. Human Relations 47 (October 1994): 1269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salancik, Gerald R., and Jeffrey Pfeffer. “A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design”. Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (June 1978): 224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schriesheim, Chester A., and Anne S. Tsui. “Dual Commitment ofCompany and Union: Fact or Fiction?” Paper presented at the 40th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, 1980.Google Scholar
  44. Stagner, Ross. “Dual Allegiance As a Problem in Modern Society”. Personnel Psychology 7 (Spring 1954): 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tett, Robert P., and John P. Meyer. “Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, Turnover Intention, and Turnover: Path Analyses Based on Meta-Analytic Findings”. Personnel Psychology 46 (Summer 1993): 259–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walton, Richard E., Joel E. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, and Robert B. McKersie. Strategic Negotiations: A Theory of Change in Labor-Management Relations. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  47. Weiss, Howard M., and Russell Cropanzano. “Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work”. In Barry M. Staw and L.L. Cummings, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 18. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1996, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
  48. Wheeler, Hoyt N. Industrial Conflict: An Integrative Theory. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, Craig R., and Linda P. Livingstone. “Another Look at the Relationship between Performance and Voluntary Turnover”. Academy of Management Journal 37 (April 1994): 269–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Bryan Fuller
    • 1
  • Kim Hester
    • 1
  1. 1.Arkansas State UniversityJonesboro

Personalised recommendations