Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 425–437 | Cite as

The impact of changing union density on earnings inequality: Evidence from the private and public sectors

  • Martin A. Asher
  • Robert H. DeFina
Article

Abstract

The degree of inequality in U.S. earnings has varied considerably over the past 20 years, including a dramatic, much documented rise since 1980. We examine empirically how changes in union density have contributed to these trends, using Current Population Survey data for 1977 and 1992. Inequality is measured as the mean logarithmic deviation of individual earnings from overall average earnings. A decomposition of the change in the inequality index reveals that decreases in private-sector union density have accounted for about 25 percent of the overall rise in earnings inequality during the past 15 years. Decompositions based on public-sector earnings indicate that increases in union density have produced inequality that is 29 percent below what it otherwise would have been. The analysis demonstrates that, among private sector workers, the results are sensitive to the population being studied: Changing union density accounts for 13 percent of the rise among prime aged males (a noticeably smaller fraction than found in existing studies) and only 4 percent among females and non-prime-aged males. The analysis also demonstrates that covariances between the subsamples explain why the union effect is larger in percentage terms for the whole sample than it is in either subsample.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, Martin A., and Robert H. DeFina. “A Decomposition Analysis of Recent U.S. Earnings Inequality Trends.” mimeo, Villanova University, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, Anthony B. “On the Measurement of Inequality.” Journal of Economic Theory 2 (September 1970): 244–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balke, Nathan S., and Daniel J. Slottje. “A Macroeconometric Model of Income Inequality in the U.S.” mimeo, August 1992.Google Scholar
  4. Bartel, Ann P., and Frank Lichtenberg. “The Comparative Advantage of Educated Workers in Implementing New Technology.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (February 1987): 343–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumol, William J., and Alan S. Blinder. Economics: Principles and Policy. 6th ed. Orlando, Fl.: Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Blackburn, McKinley. “What Can Explain the Increase in Earnings Inequality Among Males?” Industrial Relations 29 (Fall 1990): 441–55.Google Scholar
  7. Bound, John, and George Johnson. “Changes in the Structure of Wages in the 1980's: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations.” American Economic Review 82 (June 1992): 371–92.Google Scholar
  8. Burtless, Gary. “Earnings Inequality over the Business Cycle.” In Gary Burtless, ed., A Future of Lousy Jobs? Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Card, David. “The Effect of Unions on the Distribution of Wages: Redistribution or Relabelling?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4195 (October 1992).Google Scholar
  10. Farber, Henry, and Alan Krueger. “Union Membership in the United States: The Decline Continues.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4216, June 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, Richard. “Unionism and the Dispersion of Wages.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 34 (October 1980): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. —. “Union Wage Practices and Wage Dispersion Within Establishments.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (October 1982): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —. “How Much Has Deunionization Contributed to the Rise in Male Earnings Inequality?” In Sheldon Danziger and Peter Gottschalk, eds. Uneven Tides: Rising Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. —, and James Medoff. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, Robert J. Macroeconomics. 6th ed. New York: Harper-Collins College Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. Gosling, Amanda, and Stephen Machin. “Trade Unions and the Dispersion of Earnings in British Establishments, 1980-90.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4732 (May 1994).Google Scholar
  17. Grubb, W. Norton, and Robert H. Wilson. “Trends in Wage and Salary Inequality, 1967-1988.” Monthly Labor Review 115 (June 1992): 23–39.Google Scholar
  18. Harrison, Bennett, and Barry Bluestone. The Great U-Turn. New York: Basic Books, 1988.Google Scholar
  19. Hirsch, Barry. “The Interindustry Structure of Unionism, Earnings, and Earnings Dispersion.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (October 1982): 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. —, and David A. Macpherson. Union Membership and Earnings Data Book 1993. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. Hyclak, Thomas. “The Effect of Unions on Earnings Inequality in Local Labor Markets.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33 (October 1979): 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenkins, Stephen. “The Measurement of Income Inequality.” In Lars Osberg, ed. Economic Inequality and Poverty: International Perspectives. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1991.Google Scholar
  23. Juhn, Chinhui, Kevin M. Murphy, and Brooks Pierce. “Wage Inequality and the Rise in the Returns to Skill.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (June 1993): 410–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karoly, Lynn. “Changes in the Distribution of Individual Earnings in the United States: 1967-1986.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74 (February 1992): 107–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katz, Lawrence F., and Kevin M. Murphy. “Changes in Relative Wages in the United States: Supply and Demand Factors.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (February 1992): 35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawrence, Robert. “Sectoral Shifts and the Size of the Middle Class.” Brookings Review 3 (Fall 1984): 3–11.Google Scholar
  27. Lazear, Edward, Richard Freeman, and Melvin Reder. “Symposium on Public and Private Unionization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (Spring 1988): 59–110.Google Scholar
  28. Levy, Frank, and Richard J. Mumane. “U.S. Earnings Levels and Earnings Inequality: A Review of Recent Trends and Proposed Explanations.” Journal of Economic Literature 30 (September 1992): 1333–81.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, John E. Two-Tier Wage Compensation Structures: Their Impact on Unions, Employers, and Employees. Kalamazoo, Mich: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1990.Google Scholar
  30. MacPherson, David A., and James B. Stewart. “Unionism and the Dispersion of Wages among Blue-Collar Women.” Journal of Labor Research 8 (Fall 1987): 395–406.Google Scholar
  31. McCabe, David A. The Standard Rate in American Trade Unions. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press, 1912.Google Scholar
  32. McConnell, Campbell, and Stanley Brue. Contemporary Labor Economics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.Google Scholar
  33. Mookherjee, Dilip, and Anthony Shorrocks. “A Decomposition Analysis of the Trend in UK Income Inequality.” Economic Journal 92 (December 1982): 886–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Jerry Ross. “Unionization and Income Inequality.” Industrial Relations 20 (Fall 1981): 1–31.Google Scholar
  35. Quan, Nguyen T. “Unionism and the Size Distribution of Earnings.” Industrial Relations 23 (Spring 1984): 270–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reynolds, Lloyd G., and Cynthia Taft. The Evolution of Wage Structure. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
  37. Shorrocks, Anthony. “The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures.” Econometrica 48 (April 1980): 613–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Slichter, Sumner, James J. Healy, and E. Robert Livernash. The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1960.Google Scholar
  39. Thurow, Lester. “A Surge in Inequality.” Scientific American 256 (May 1987): 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin A. Asher
    • 1
  • Robert H. DeFina
    • 2
  1. 1.Swathmore CollegeSwathmore
  2. 2.Villanova UniversityVillanova

Personalised recommendations