Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 487–527 | Cite as

Sexual Orientation and Wage Discrimination in France: The Hidden Side of the Rainbow

Article
First Online:

Abstract

This article is the first study to present an econometric evaluation of wage discrimination based on sexual orientation in the French labor market. Having identified same-sex couples using the French Employment Survey, we estimate the wage gap related to sexual orientation in the private and public sectors, in order to analyze whether or not lesbians and gays suffer a wage penalty. The results obtained show the existence of a wage penalty for homosexual male workers, as compared with their heterosexual counterparts, in both the private and public sectors; the magnitude of this discrimination varies from about −6.5 % in the private sector, to −5.5 % in the public sector. In the private sector, the wage penalty suffered by gay employees is higher for skilled workers than for the unskilled, and—in both sectors—the wage penalty is higher for older workers than for younger ones. As with many other countries, we do not find any evidence of the existence of a wage discrimination against lesbians.

Keywords

Wage discrimination Sexual orientation Gay & lesbians 

JEL Classification

J7 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ahmed AM, Hammarstedt M (2009) Sexual orientation and earnings: a register data based approach to identify homosexuals. J Popul Econ, JulyGoogle Scholar
  2. Allegretto SA, Arthur M (2001) An empirical analysis of homosexual/heterosexual male earnings differentials: unmarried and unequal? Ind Labor Relat Rev 54(3), AprilGoogle Scholar
  3. Antecol H, Steinberger M (2009) Female labor supply differences by sexual orientation: a semi-parametric decomposition approach. IZA Discussion Paper n°4029, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  4. Antecol H, Jong A, Steinberger M (2007) The sexual orientation wage gap: the role of occupational sorting, human capital, and discrimination. IZA Discussion Paper n°2945, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), JulyGoogle Scholar
  5. Arabsheibani GR, Marin A, Wadsworth J (2007) Variations in gay pay in the USA and the UK. In: Badgett L, Frank J (eds) Sexual orientation discrimination: an international perspective. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Arabsheibani GR, Marin A, Wadsworth J (2002) Gays’ pay in the UK, n°8, Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 from Royal Economic SocietyGoogle Scholar
  7. Arabsheibani GR, Marin A, Wadsworth J (2004) In the pink: homosexual/heterosexual wage differentials in the UK. Int J Manpow 25(3–4):343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arabsheibani GR, Marin A, Wadsworth J (2005) Gays’ pay in the UK. Economica 72:333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arrow K (1973) The theory of discrimination. In: Ashenfelter O, Rees A (eds) Discrimination in labor markets. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Badgett L (1995) The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48(4):726–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Badgett L (2001) Money, myths, and change: the economic live of lesbians and gay men. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Badgett L (2006) Discrimination based on sexual orientation: a review of the literature in economics and beyond. In: Rodgers WM III (ed) Handbook on the economics of discrimination. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  13. Badgett L, Lau H, Sears B, Ho D (2007) Bias in the workplace: consistent evidence of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination. University of California Los Angeles, UCLA, The Williams Institute, JuneGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker GS (1957) The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal 75(299):493–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Becker GS (1981) A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Berg N, Lien D (2002) Measuring the effect of sexual orientation on Income: evidence of discrimination? Contemporary Economic Policy 20(4):394–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berill KT (1992) Anti-gay violence and victimization in the United States: an overview. In: Herek GM, Berill KT (eds) Hate crimes: confronting violence against lesbians and gay men. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  19. Berson C (2009) Private vs. public sector: discrimination against second-generation immigrants in France, Working Paper of the Sorbonne Center for Economics, n°2009-59, University Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  20. Black D, Makar H, Sanders S, Taylor L (2003) The earnings effects of sexual orientation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56(3):449–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Black D, Gates G, Sanders S, Taylor L (2000) Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography 37(2):139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Blandford JM (1999) Sexual orientation’s role in the determination of earnings and occupational outcomes: theory and econometric evidence, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  23. Blandford JM (2000) Evidence on the role of sexual orientation in the determination of earnings outcomes. Working Paper Harris Graduate School of Public Policies Studies, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Blandford JM (2003) The nexus of sexual orientation and gender in the determination of earnings. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56(4):622–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Blinder AS (1973) Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. The Journal of Human Resources 8:436–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Calandrino M (1999) Sexual orientation discrimination on the UK labor market. Working Paper St. Antony’s College, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Carpenter CS (2004) New evidence on gay and lesbian household incomes. Contemporary Economic Policy 22(1):78–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carpenter CS (2005a) Self-reported sexual orientation and earnings: evidence from California. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 58(2):258–273Google Scholar
  29. Carpenter CS (2005b) Heterosexual signalling and the marriage premium. Unpublished paperGoogle Scholar
  30. Carpenter CS (2007a) Revisiting the income penalty for behaviorally gay men: evidence from NHANES III. Labour Economics 14:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Carpenter CS (2007b) Do straight men “come out” at work too? The heterosexual male marriage premium and discrimination against gay men. In: Badgett L, Frank J (eds) Sexual orientation discrimination: an international perspective. Routledge, New York, pp 76–92Google Scholar
  32. Carpenter CS (2008a) Sexual orientation, work, and income in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics 41(4):1239–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Carpenter CS (2008a) Sexual orientation, income, and non-pecuniary economic outcomes: new evidence from young lesbians in Australia. Review of Economics of the Household, Springer Netherlands ed., Vol. 6, n°4, December, pp 391–408Google Scholar
  34. Clain HS, Leppel K (2001) An investigation into sexual orientation discrimination as an explanation for wage differences. Appl Econ 33(1):37–47Google Scholar
  35. Digoix M, Festy P, Garnier B (2004) What if same-sex couples exist in France after all? In: Digoix M, Festy P (eds) “Same-sex couples, same-sex partnerships & homosexual marriages: a focus on cross-national differentials”., Ined, Working Paper n°124Google Scholar
  36. Elmslie B, Tebaldi E (2007) Sexual orientation and labor market discrimination. Journal of Labor Research 28(3):436–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frank J (2006) Gay glass ceilings. Economica 73:485–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frank J (2007) Is the male marriage premium evidence of discrimination against gay men? In: Badgett L, Frank J (eds) Sexual orientation discrimination: an international perspective. Routledge Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Heckman J (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator of such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5:475–492Google Scholar
  40. Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heineck G (2009) Sexual orientation and earnings: evidence from the ISSP. Applied Economics Letters 16(13):1351–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoffnar E, Greene M (1996) Gender discrimination in the public and private sectors: a sample selectivity approach. J Socio-Econ, Elsevier 25(1):105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Irwin J (1999) The pink ceiling is too low: workplace experiences of lesbians, gay men and transgender people. Australian Centre for Lesbian and Gay Research, New South Wales: Gay and Lesbian Rights LobbyGoogle Scholar
  44. Kite ME, Whitley BE (1996) Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22:336–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klawitter M (1997) The effects of sexual orientation on the determinants of earnings for women. Working Paper, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Klawitter M (1998) The determinants of earnings for women in same-sex and different-sex couples. Working Paper, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  47. Klawitter M, Flatt V (1998) The effects of state and local antidiscrimination policies on earnings for gays and lesbians. J Policy Anal Manag 17(4):658–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Meurs D, Ponthieux S (2000) Une mesure de la discrimination dans l’écart de salaire entre hommes et femmes. Economie et Statistiques, n° 337–338Google Scholar
  49. Meurs D, Ponthieux S (2006) L’écart des salaires entre les femmes et les hommes peut-il encore baisser? Economie et Statistiques, n° 398–399Google Scholar
  50. Oaxaca RL (1973) Male–female wage differentials in urban labour markets. Int Econ Rev 14:693–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oaxaca RL, Ransom MR (1994) On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials. Journal of Econometrics 61:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (PRCPP) (2002) What the World Thinks in 2002. Topline ResultsGoogle Scholar
  53. Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review 62:659–661Google Scholar
  54. Plug E, Berkhout P (2004) Effects of sexual preferences on earnings in the Netherlands. Journal of Population Economics 17:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plug E, Berkhout P (2008) Sexual orientation, disclosure and earnings,. IZA Discussion Paper, n°3290Google Scholar
  56. Rouault D (2001) Les revenus des indépendants et dirigeants: la valorisation du bagage personnel. Economie et Prévision 348:35–59Google Scholar
  57. Toulemon L, Vitrac J, Cassan F (2005) Le difficile comptage des couples homosexuels d’après l’enquête EHF. In «Histoires de familles, histoires familiales », sous la direction de Cécile Lefèvre et Alexandra Filhon, Ined, les Cahiers de l’Ined, n° 156, partie IX.32, pp 589–602Google Scholar
  58. Zweimuller J, Winter-Ebmer R (1993) Gender wage differentials in private and public sector jobs. J Popul Econ, Springer 7(3):271–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EPEE, Center for Economic Policy StudiesUniversity of Evry-Val d’Essonne & UniverSud Paris, Department of EconomicsEvry cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations