Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 143–172 | Cite as

Have Labor Market Reforms at the Turn of the Millennium Changed the Job and Employment Durations of new Entrants?

A Comparative Study for Germany and Italy
  • Gianna Claudia GiannelliEmail author
  • Ursula Jaenichen
  • Claudia Villosio


Many European countries during the 1990s and early 2000s tried to raise labor market flexibility by relaxing their employment protection legislation. This paper investigates whether the reforms have influenced job and employment stability for labor market entrants in Germany and Italy. Duration models are estimated using comparable administrative data for the two countries. The results provide, to some extent, evidence of a decrease in job stability. However, this is not accompanied by a compensating increase in employment stability during the first 3 years after labor market entry.


Job and employment stability Flexibility Labor market reforms Duration analysis Mixed proportional hazard Germany Italy 


J62 J64 J68 K31 C41 



In July 2009 we presented this paper at the ILO-RDW conference on “Regulating for Decent Work—Innovative labor regulation in a turbulent world” in Geneva. We wish to thank Janine Berg, Sandrine Cazes and all the participants for their helpful suggestions. We also wish to thank Alfonso Arpaia, Simone Bertoli, Marco Caliendo, Bruno Contini, Riccardo Del Punta, Debra Hevenstone, Frauke Kreuter, Anton Nivorozhkin, Lia Pacelli, Matteo Picchio, Jennifer Sinibaldi, Joachim Wolff and two anonymous referees for their useful comments. A visiting fellowship in July 2008 at DG Economic and Financial Affairs in Brussels to develop this research project is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Abbring J, Van den Berg G (2007) The Unobserved Heterogeneity Distribution in Duration Analysis. Biometrika 94(1):87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoni M, Jahn EJ (2009) Do changes in regulation affect employment duration in temporary work agencies? Ind Lab Relat Rev 62(2):226–251Google Scholar
  3. Bauer TK, Bender S, Bonin H (2007) Dismissal protection and worker flows in small establishments. Economica 74:804–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berton F, Devicienti F, Pacelli L (2007) Temporary jobs: Port of Entry, Trap, or just Unobserved Heterogeneity?, LABORatorio Revelli Working Paper No. 68Google Scholar
  5. Boeri T, Jimeno JF (2005) The Effects of Employment Protection: Learning from Variable Enforcement. Eur Econ Rev 49:2057–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boockmann B, Hagen T (2008) Fixed term contracts as sorting mechanisms: evidence from job durations in West Germany. Labour Economics 15(5):984–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boockmann B, Gutknecht D, Steffes S (2008) Die Wirkung des Kündigungsschutzes auf die Stabilität “junger” Beschäftigungsverhältnisse. J Lab Market Res (ZAF) 41(2/3):347–364Google Scholar
  8. Booth AL, Francesconi M, Garcia-Serrano C (1999) Job tenure and job mobility in Britain. Ind Lab Relat Rev 53(1):43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Contini B, Grand E (2009) Disposable Workforce in Italy, LABORatorio Revelli Working Paper No. 98; also published as IZA DP, no. 4724, January 2010Google Scholar
  10. D’Addio AC, Rosholm M (2005) Exits from temporary jobs in europe: a competing risk analysis. Lab Econ 12:449–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gagliarducci S (2005) The dynamics of repeated temporary jobs. Lab Econ 12:429–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ichino A, Mealli F, Nannicini T (2008) From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: what can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity? J Appl Econ 23(3):305–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kvasnicka M (2009) Does temporary help work provide a stepping stone to regular employment?, NBER Chapters, in: Studies of Labor Market Intermediation, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 335–372Google Scholar
  14. Lancaster T (1979) Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment. Econometrica 47:939–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lancaster T (1990) The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Lancaster T, Nickell S (1980) The analysis of re-employment probabilities for the unemployed. J Royal Stat Soc, Series A 43:142–152Google Scholar
  17. OECD (1999), Employment Outlook, “Employment Protection and Labour Market Performance”, Ch. 2Google Scholar
  18. OECD (2006), Employment Outlook, “Labour Market Performance since 1994 and Future Challenges”, Ch. 2Google Scholar
  19. Ridder G (1984) The distribution of single-spell duration data. In: Neumann G, Westergaard-Nielsen N (eds) Studies in labor market dynamics. Springer, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  20. Scherer S (2005) Patterns of labour market entry—long wait or career instability? An empirical comparison of Italy, Great Britain and West Germany. Eur Sociol Rev 21(5):427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sianesi B (2004) An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s. Rev Econ Stat 86(1):133–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianna Claudia Giannelli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ursula Jaenichen
    • 2
  • Claudia Villosio
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Florence, CHILD and IZAFirenzeItaly
  2. 2.Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (IAB)NürnbergGermany
  3. 3.LABORatorio R. RevelliCollegio Carlo AlbertoMoncalieri (Turin)Italy

Personalised recommendations