Advertisement

Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Evidence from the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident: The Effect on Health, Education, and Labor Market Outcomes in Belarus

  • Maksim Yemelyanau
  • Aliaksandr AmialchukEmail author
  • Mir M. Ali
Article

Abstract

The Chernobyl nuclear accident of 1986 had deleterious health consequences for the population of Belarus, especially for those who were children at the time of the disaster. Using the 2003–2008 waves of the Belarusian Household Survey of Income and Expenditure (BHSIE), we estimate the effect of radiation exposure on the health, education, and labor market outcomes among cohorts and areas affected by the accident, utilizing the nuclear accident as a natural experiment. We find that young individuals who came from the most contaminated areas had worse health, were less likely to hold university degrees, were less likely to be employed, and had lower wages compared to those who were older at the time of the accident and who came from less contaminated areas.

Keywords

Chernobyl Belarus Health Education Wage Employment 

JEL

I18 I20 Q53 J24 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Štěpán Jurajda, Randall K. Filer, Mykhaylo Salnykov, Kateryna Bornukova, Lauren Heller, Christopher Jepsen and the participants of the seminar at BEROC for their valuable comments. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Food & Drug Administration.

References

  1. Almond D (2006) Is the 1918 influenza pandemic over? Long-term effects of in utero influenza exposure in the post-1940 U.S. population. J Polit Econ 14(4):672–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almond D, Edlund L, Palme M (2009) Chernobyl’s subclinical legacy: prenatal exposure to radioactive fallout and school outcomes in Sweden. Q J Econ 124(4):1729–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, 2009. 392 pGoogle Scholar
  4. Balonov MI (2007) The Chernobyl Forum: major findings and recommendations. J Environ Radioact 96(1–3):6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bespalchuk PI, Demidchik YE, Demidchik EP, Gedrevich ZE, Dubovskaya AP, Saenko VA, Yamashita S (2007) Thyroid cancer in Belarus after Chernobyl. International Congress Series, No. 1299, pp 27-31Google Scholar
  6. Bleakley HC (2007) Disease and development: evidence from Hookworm Eradication in the American South. Q J Econ 122(1):73–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Case A, Lubotsky D, Paxson C (2002) Economic status and health in childhood: the origins of the gradient. Am Econ Rev 92(5):1308–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Case A, Fertig A, Paxson C (2005) The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. J Health Econ 24:365–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farahati J, Demidchik EP, Biko J, Reiners C (2000) Inverse association between age at the time of radiation exposure and extent of disease in cases of radiation-induced childhood thyroid carcinoma in Belarus. Cancer 88(6):1470–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fletcher JM, Lehrer SF (2008) Using genetic lotteries within families to examine the causal impact of poor health on academic achievement. Yale University working paperGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldsmith JR, Grossman CM, Morton WE, Nussbaum RH, Kordysh EA, Quastel MR, Sobel RB, Nussbaum FD (1999) Juvenile hypothyroidism among two populations exposed to radioiodine. Environ Health Perspect 107(4):303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grossman M, Kaestner R (1997) Effects of education on health. In: Behrman JR, Stacey N (eds) The social benefits of education. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IAEA (2005) Chernobyl Forum, 2003–2005 (online). http://www-ns.iaea.org/meetings/rw-summaries/chernobyl_forum.htm. Chernobyl Forum, 2003–2005
  15. Kolominsky Y, Igumnov S, Drozdovitch V (1999) The psychological development of children from Belarus exposed in the prenatal period to radiation from the Chernobyl atomic power plant. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 40(2):299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kremer M, Miguel E (2004) Worms: identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica 72:159–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kruk JE, Pröhl G, Kenigsberg JI (2004) A radioecological model for thyroid dose reconstruction of the Belarus population following the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Environ Biophys 43(2):101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehmann H, Wadsworth J (2009) The impact of chernobyl on health and labour market performance in the Ukraine. ESCIRRU Working Paper, No 12, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  19. Loganovskaja TN, Loganovsky KN (1999) EEG, cognitive and psychopathological abnormalities in children irradiated in utero. Int J Psychophysiol 34:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maccini S, Yang D (2009) Under the weather: health, schooling, and economic consequences of early-life rainfall. Am Econ Rev 99(3)Google Scholar
  21. Medvedev AZ (1990) The legacy of chernobyl. Norton, New York, xiv, 352 pp., illusGoogle Scholar
  22. Meng X, Qian N (2006) The long run health and economic consequences of famine on survivors: evidence from China’s great famine. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2471Google Scholar
  23. Nyahu AI, Loganovsky KN, Loganovskaja TK (1998) Psychophysiologic aftereffects of prenatal irradiation. Int J Psychophysiol 30:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ostroumova E, Brenner A, Oliynyk V, McConnell R, Robbins J, Terekhova G, Zablotska L, Likhtarev I, Bouville A, Shpak V, Markov V, Masnyk I, Ron E, Tronko M, Hatch M (2009) Subclinical hypothyroidism after radioiodine exposure: Ukrainian-American cohort study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases after the Chornobyl accident (1998–2000). Environ Health Perspect 117(5):745–750Google Scholar
  25. Pacini F, Vorontsova T, Molinaro E, Kuchinskaya E, Agate L, Shavrova E, Astachova L, Chiovato L, Pinchera A (1998) Prevalence of thyroid autoantibodies in children and adolescents from Belarus exposed to the Chernobyl radioactive fallout. Lancet 352(9130):763–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pastore F, Verashchagina A (2007) When does transition increase the gender wage gap? An application to Belarus. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2796Google Scholar
  27. Quastel MR, Goldsmith JR, Mirkin L, Poljak S, Barki Y, Levy J, Gorodischer R (1997) Thyroid-stimulating hormone levels in children from Chernobyl. Environ Health Perspect 105(suppl 6):1497–1498Google Scholar
  28. Reiners C, Demidchik YE, Drozd VM, Biko J (2008) Thyroid cancer in infants and adolescents after Chernobyl. Minerva Endocrinol 33(4):381–395Google Scholar
  29. Strauss J, Thomas D (1998) Health, nutrition, and economic development. J Econ Lit 36(2):766–817Google Scholar
  30. UNDP (2002) The human consequences of the chernobyl nuclear accident: a strategy for recovery. A report commissioned by UNDP and UNICEF with the support of OCHA and WHO, 25 Jan. 2002Google Scholar
  31. Vykhovanets EV, Chernyshov VP, Slukvin II, Antipkin YG, Vasyuk AN, Klimenko HF, Strauss KW (1997) ¹³¹I dose-dependent thyroid autoimmune disorders in children living around Chernobyl. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 84(3):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WHO (2006) Health effects of the Chernobyl accident and special health care programmes. WHO, Geneva, ISBN 978 92 4 159417 2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maksim Yemelyanau
    • 1
  • Aliaksandr Amialchuk
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mir M. Ali
    • 3
  1. 1.CERGE-EIPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Toledo & Office of Regulations, Policy and Social Science, Food & Drug AdministrationCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations