Advertisement

Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 333–346 | Cite as

The Effects of Licensing on the Wages of Radiologic Technologists

  • Edward J. Timmons
  • Robert J. ThorntonEmail author
Article

Abstract

We analyze the effect that state licensing of radiologic technologists (RTs) has had upon RT wages with a unique dataset that allows us to control for place of work and job specialization. Using OLS and several measures of licensing, we find evidence that RTs working in states with licensing statutes earn as much as 3.3% more than RTs working in states without licensing. When we control for endogeneity using instrumental variables (IV) estimation, our estimate of the licensing premium doubles (6.9%). Our results provide further support for existing theories of the effects of occupational licensing on the wages of practitioners.

Keywords

Occupational licensing Radiologic technologists Wages Labor markets Job regulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank seminar participants at Lehigh University, the Eastern Economic Association’s 2006 Conference, and an anonymous referee for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Adams AF III (1996) Occupational licensing of cosmetologists and midwives: two empirical studies of the effects of regulation. Dissertation, Auburn UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams AF III, Ekelund R, Jackson J (2002) Occupational licensing in a ‘competitive’ labor market: the case of cosmetology. J Labor Res 23:261–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Society of Radiologic Technologists (2001) Radiologic technologist wage and salary surveyGoogle Scholar
  4. American Society of Radiologic Technologists (ASRT) (2004) Legislative guidebook for state and federal legislationGoogle Scholar
  5. Benham L, Benham A (1975) Regulating through the professions: a perspective on information control. J Law Econ 18:421–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchflower D, Bryson A (2004) What effect do unions have on wages now and would Freeman and Medoff be surprised? J Labor Res 25:383–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau F, Kahn L (2000) Gender differences in pay. J Econ Perspect 14:75–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2007) U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational outlook handbook, 2006–07 EditionGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter C, Stephenson EF (2006) The 150-hour rule as a barrier to entering public accountancy. J Labor Res 27:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman R, Begun J (1985) The welfare cost of quality changes due to professional regulation. J Ind Econ 34:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisman R, Gatti R (2002) Decentralization and corruption: evidence from U.S. Federal Transfer Programs. Public Choice 113:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman M, Kuznets S (1945) Income from independent professional practice. NBER, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Graddy E, Nichol M (1989) Public members on occupational licensing boards: effects of legislative regulatory reforms. South Econ J 55:610–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halvorsen R, Palmquist R (1980) The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am Econ Rev 70:474–475Google Scholar
  16. Jackson R (2006) E. Post-graduate education requirements and entry into the CPA profession. J Labor Res 27:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jang C (2000) Occupational licensing in the new health care environment: an integrated framework and empirical analysis. Dissertation, University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  18. Kleiner M (2000) Occupational licensing. J Econ Perspect 14:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleiner M (2006) Licensing occupations: ensuring quality or restricting competition. W.E. Upjohn Institute, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleiner M, Kudrle R (2000) Does regulation affect economic outcomes? The case of dentistry. J Law Econ 18:547–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korenman S, Neumark D (1991) Does marriage really make men more productive? J Hum Resour 26:282–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Korenman S, Neumark D (1992) Marriage, motherhood, and wages. J Hum Resour 27:282–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kugler A, Sauer R (2005) Doctors without borders? Relicensing requirements and negative selection in the market for physicians. J Labor Econ 23:437–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leland H (1979) Quacks, lemons, and licensing: a theory of minimum quality standards. J Polit Econ 87:1328–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moulton B (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Rev Econ Stat 72:334–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pashigian BP (1980) Has occupational licensing reduced geographic mobility and raised wages? In Rottenberg S (ed) Occupational licensure and regulation. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, pp 299–333Google Scholar
  27. Shapiro C (1986) Investment, moral hazard, and occupational licensing. Rev Econ Stud 53:843–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shephard L (1978) Licensing restrictions and the cost of dental care. J Law Econ 21:187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Staiger D, Stock J (1997) Instrumental variable regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65:557–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stigler G (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ 2:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tenn, S (2001) Three essays on the relationship between migration and occupational licensing. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Thornton R, Weintraub A (1979) Licensing in the barbering profession. Ind Labor Relat Rev 32:242–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thornton R, Innes J (1989) Interpreting semilogarithmic regression coefficients in labor research. J Labor Res 10:443–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White W (1978) The impact of occupational licensure of clinical laboratory personnel. J Hum Resour 13:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. White W (1980) Mandatory licensing of registered nurses: introduction and impact. In Rottenberg S (ed) Occupational licensure and regulation. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, pp 47–72Google Scholar
  36. Wu D (1973) Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances. Econometrica 41:733–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations