Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 373–390 | Cite as

An alternative look at temporary workers, their choices, and the growth in temporary employment

  • Michael D. S. Morris
  • Alexander Vekker


We examine temporary workers (temps), their choices, and growth in temporary employment. We find that some people choose a temporary job because they desire greater schedule flexibility, particularly students and women with children. For most, however, weaker permanent job opportunities drive them into temporary positions. Using the 1995 and 1997 Current Population Surveys (CPS) we find that both the percentage of the work force in temporary jobs and the absolute number of temps declined when applying a new CPS-based measure of temporary. This is in stark contrast to the rising percentage found in several previous studies when looking only at workers in personnel supply services and clearly questions prior claims and concerns about growth in the temporary work force.


Current Population Survey Temporary Worker Temporary Position Temporary Labor Temporary Employment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cohany, Sharon R. “Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements.” Monthly Labor Review 119 (October 1996): 31–45.Google Scholar
  2. Golden, Lonnie. “The Expansion of Temporary Help Employment in the U.S., 1982-1992: A Test of Alternative Economic Explanations.” Applied Economics 28 (September 1996): 1127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Greene, William H. Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. —. LIMDEP Version 7.0: User’s Manual. Bellport, N.Y.: Econometric Software, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. Hausman, Jerry and Daniel McFadden. “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.” Econometrica 52 (September 1984): 1219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hippie, Steven and Jay Stewart. “Earnings and Benefits of Workers in Alternative Work Arrangements.” Monthly Labor Review 119 (October 1996): 46–54.Google Scholar
  7. Houseman, Susan H. and Anne E. Polivka. “The Implications of Flexible Security.” Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper 317(1998).Google Scholar
  8. Laird, Karylee and Nicolas Williams. “Employment Growth in the Temporary Help Supply Industry.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Fall 1996): 663–81.Google Scholar
  9. Lenz, Edward A. “Flexible Employment: Positive Work Strategies for the 21st Century.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Fall 1996): 555–66.Google Scholar
  10. National Association of Temporary and Staffing Services. “ 1994 Profile of the Temporary Workforce.” Contemporary Times. Alexandria, Va.: NATSS, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. Nollen, Stanley D. “Negative Aspects of Temporary Employment.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Fall 1996): 567–82.Google Scholar
  12. Parker, Robert E. Flesh Peddlers and Warm Bodies: The Temporary Help Supply Industry and Its Workers. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Polivka, Anne E. “Are Temporary Help Agency Workers Substitutes for Direct-Hire Temporary Workers?” Paper presented at the Society of Labor Economists Conference (May 1996a).Google Scholar
  14. —. “Contingent and Alternative Work Arrangements, Defined.” Monthly Labor Review 119 (October 1996b): 3–9.Google Scholar
  15. —. “A Profile of Contingent Workers.” Monthly Labor Review 119 (October 1996c): 10–21.Google Scholar
  16. Segal, Lewis M. “Flexible Employment: Composition and Trends.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Fall 1996): 525–42.Google Scholar
  17. — and Daniel G. Sullivan. “The Growth of Temporary Services Work.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (Spring 1997): 117–36.Google Scholar
  18. — and Daniel G. Sullivan. “The Temporary Labor Force.” Economic Perspectives 19 (March-April 1995): 2–19.Google Scholar
  19. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements,” Report 900, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. -. “Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, February 1997.” Press release, December 2, 1997.Google Scholar
  21. Welch, Finis. “Matching the Current Population Surveys.” Stata Technical Bulletin STB-12 (1993): 7–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. S. Morris
    • 1
  • Alexander Vekker
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations