This paper discusses how the so-called social construct, i.e., the frame of heteronormativity, can be maintained, reproduced and enacted by language within same-sex dating communities in the twenty-first century. That is, we examine heteronormativity in discourse collected from two popular same-sex dating websites in Taiwan in order to analyze how heteronormative ideologies influence the linguistic construction of homosexual desires, dating preferences, and queer relationships. By scrutinizing the keywords in the corpora through the lens of Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics, we argue that there are still power relationships among Taiwanese gay men and lesbian women seeking romantic love online that are informed by heteronormative ideologies around gender within the scope of homosexuality. On the one hand, the keywords contain many binary roles providing conventional interactional modes for Taiwanese homosexual couples that show great similarity to those in heterosexual relationships. On the other hand, the analysis indicates that heteronormative constructions of masculinity and femininity are related to anxieties over mainstream preferences for dating on the two target websites.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
This website was valid while we collected our data for this research; however, it was found closed on Aug 30, 2018.
Our data are parsed and segmented into smaller lexical units, or so-called ‘words’, by System for Chinese Segmentation, which is currently managed by National Digital Archives Program in Taiwan.
According to the manual of WordSmith Tools 6.0, the keyness of an item is computed through Ted Dunning's Log Likelihood test, which measures keyness in terms of statistical significance and is considered more appropriate than using Chi square, especially when contrasting long texts or a whole genre against your reference corpus. See UCREL's log likelihood site (http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html) for more on this.
All the examples provided in this paper are originally in Mandarin Chinese, but are presented only in English due to length limitations (except for the key terms discussed) and privacy considerations.
Baker, P. (2003). No effeminates please: A corpus-based analysis of masculinity via personal adverts in Gay News/Times 1973–2000. The Sociological Review,51, 243–260.
Baker, P. (2004). Querying keywords questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics,32, 346–359.
Baker, P. (2008). Sexed texts: Language, gender and sexuality. Sheffield: Equinox.
Bergling, T. (2001). Sissyphobia: Gay men and effeminate behavior. New York: Harrington Park.
British Psychological Society. (2017). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. INF206/04.2017. Leicester: Author. Retrieved February 12, 2020, from https://www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/ethics-guidelines-internet-mediated-research-2017.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society,33, 469–515.
Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal,40(4), 519–531.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (Thinking gender). New York: Routledge.
Cai, M.-Z. (2009). Lying inside the closet of brothers. In C. Ho (Ed.), Queer sounding (pp. 1–38). Taoyuan: National Central University. Retrieved February 12, 2020, from http://sex.ncu.edu.tw/publication/2009/queer/pdf/02.pdf. (in Chinese).
Cameron, D., & Kulick, D. (2003). Language and sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, D., & Kulick, D. (2006). Heteronorms. In D. Cameron & D. Kulick (Eds.), The language and sexuality reader (pp. 165–168). London: Routledge.
Chambers, S. A. (2003). Telepistemology of the closet; or, the queer politics of Six Feet Under. The Journal of American Culture,26, 24–41.
Chen, M.-H. (1994). On female participating in sports from the perspective of gender role. Quarterly of Chinese Physical,8(1), 17–23. (in Chinese).
Chiu, W.-C. (2012). Enhancement of hierarchy or empowerment: Gender as performance of gay community on LBS Apps. Paper presented in the 2012 annual meeting of Chinese Communication Society (in Chinese).
Coates, J. (2013). The discursive production of everyday heterosexualities. Discourse & Society,24, 536–552.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity rethinking the concept. Gender & Society,19, 829–859.
Eguchi, S. (2009). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: The rhetorical strategy of “Straight-Acting” among gay men. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research,38(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2009.508892.
Eguchi, S. (2011). Negotiating sissyphobia: A critical/interpretive analysis of one” Femme” gay asian body in the heteronormative world. The Journal of Men’s Studies,19, 37–56.
Gardiner, J. K. (2002). Introduction. In J. K. Gardiner (Ed.), Masculinity studies and feminist theory: New directions (pp. 1–29). New York: Columbia University Press.
Hall, S. (2001). The spectacle of the other. In S. Taylor, S. J. Yates, & M. Wetherell (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice (pp. 324–344). London: Sage.
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kimmel, S. B., & Mahalik, J. R. (2005). Body image concerns of gay men: The roles of minority stress and conformity to masculine norms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,73(6), 1185–1190.
Linguistic Society of Taiwan. (2011). The ethics guidelines for linguistic studies. https://www.space.ntu.edu.tw/navigate/s/1FE7B4CCCAA94C33B69D622DCBCDEF16QQY. (in Chinese).
Louie, K., & Edwards, L. (1994). Chinese masculinity: Theorizing wen and wu. East Asian History,8, 135–148.
Madon, S. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles,37(9/10), 663–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936334.
Milani, T. M. (2013). Are ‘queers’ really ‘queer’? Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society,24(5), 1–19.
Motschenbacher, H., & Stegu, M. (2013). Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society,24(5), 519–535.
Myketiak, C. (2015). The co-construction of cybersex narratives. Discourse & Society,26, 464–479.
Nguyen, A. (2008). Patriarchy, power, and female masculinity. Journal of Homosexuality,55, 665–683.
Nip, J. Y. M. (2004a). The Queer Sisters and its Electronic Bulletin Board. Information, Communication & Society,7(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118042000208889.
Nip, J. Y. M. (2004b). The relationship between online and offline communities: The case of the queer sisters. Media, Culture and Society,26(3), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704042262.
Phua, V. C. (2002). Sex and sexuality in men’s personal advertisements. Men and Masculinities,5(2), 178–191.
Shieh, W. (2009). Studies on Gay & Lesbian couple relationships in Taiwan. Taipei: PsyGarden Publishing Company. (in Chinese).
Su, S.-G. (2009). Mobile sex/gender or fixed categorization? The gender identity of Hsimen T/Po. In C. Ho (Ed.), Queer sounding (pp. 39–77). Taoyuan: National Central University. (in Chinese).
Thorne, A., & Coupland, J. (1998). Articulations of same-sex desire: Lesbian and gay male dating advertisements. Journal of Sociolinguistics,2(2), 233–257.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, J. J., Golub, S. A., Bimbi, D. S., & Parsons, J. T. (2012). Butch bottom–femme top? An exploration of lesbian stereotypes. Journal of Lesbian Studies,16(1), 90–107.
Wang, Y.-J. (2009). Revisiting the question of identity performative on the internet: A case study of a Taiwanese Tongzhi Forum. Mass Communication Research,2, 47–77. (in Chinese).
Wittig, M. (1980). The straight mind. Feminist Issues, 1(1), 103–111.
Wittig, M. (1983). The point of view: Universal or particular? Feminist Issues,3(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685543.
Wu, C.-Y. (1998). Oasis in the city desert—An analysis of gay bar experiences in Taipei, Master thesis, National Taiwan University (in Chinese).
Zheng, M.-L. (1997). The circle of girls: Taiwanese Lesbians’ sexuality, family, and in-group lives. Taipei: Fembooks Publishing House. (in Chinese).
We are immensely grateful to Prof. Roberto Refinetti and two anonymous referees from Sexuality and Culture for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this paper. The usual disclaimers apply.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. All data were processed under the Ethics Guidelines for Linguistic Studies (Linguistic Society of Taiwan 2011) and the Ethics Guidelines for Internet-mediated Research (BPS 2017).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, P., Lu, C. Articulating Sexuality, Desire, and Identity: A Keyword Analysis of Heteronormativity in Taiwanese Gay and Lesbian Dating Websites. Sexuality & Culture (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09709-5
- Gender and sexuality
- Language and identity
- Critical Discourse Analysis
- Corpus Linguistics
- Dating websites
- Gay and lesbian
- Cultural frame